Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 preamble 1 judges inquiry act 1968 Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan jaipur Page 1 of about 15 results (0.033 seconds)

May 09 2011 (HC)

Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either [imprisonment for life], or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned.attempts by life convicts. - [when any person offending under this ..... the charge-sheet submitted by the petitioner.section 307 ipc reads as under :-307. attempt to murder.- whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances, that if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may ..... by the order dated 01.03.2011 passed by the additional sessions judge (fast track) no.1, beawar, district ajmer, whereby the learned judge has framed the charges for offences under sections 148, 323, 325, 326, 307 read with section 149 ipc and 4/25 arms act, the petitioner has approached this court. the learned counsel for the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2011 (HC)

Om Prakash Saini. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... , the state government shall draw up a statement setting out distinctly the charge against the member and shall send the same for inquiry and findings by judicial officer of the rank of a district judge to be appointed by the state government for the purpose.(3) the judicial officer so appointed shall proceed to inquire into the ..... revoked vide order dated 21.01.1993, it would not pre-empt the government from re-opining the entire case. furthermore, section 63a of the act empowers the government to hold an inquiry for any misconduct committed in an earlier term. thus, he has justified the impugned charge-sheet.8. in rejoinder, mr. gupta has contended that ..... faith in the rule of law. therefore, repeatedly the hon'ble supreme court has stressed that every action of the state must be just, fair and reasonable. any act which is unjust, unfair, or unreasonable is an anathema to the constitutional mandate and to the constitutional philosophy of this country.10. while keeping these two principles in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2011 (HC)

Rajesh Kumar. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... , as defined in section 319 cr.p.c., had occurred. therefore, the case would prima facie fall within the latter part of section 307 ipc. hence, the learned judge was certainly justified in framing the charge for the said offence.7. hence, this court does not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. this petition, being ..... to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine, and if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either to [imprisonment for life], or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned. attempts by life convicts.- when any person offending under ..... parties and perused the impugned order. section 307 ipc is as under : section 307. attempt to murder6. whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty or murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2011 (HC)

Jai Prakash @ Sunny and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... of her parents, she was saved. after a thorough investigation, the police submitted a charge-sheet for the aforementioned offence. vide order dated 21.02.2011, the learned judge framed the charges for the aforementioned offences.3. hence, this petition before this court. mr. ashvin garg, the learned counsel for the petitioners, has vehemently contended that the ..... to see if a strong prima facie case is made out against the accused-person or not.5. at the time of framing of the charges, the learned judge cannot go into meticulous examination of the evidence produced by the prosecution. in the present case, although the learned counsel has pleaded that the story narrated by the ..... framing of a charge, for offence under section 307 ipc, what the court is concerned about is to see if an act was committed with an intention or knowledge under such circumstances that by such an act death would be caused, or not according to the complainant, the petitioners had tried to hang her, but luckily she was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2011 (HC)

Jhabarmal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... concluded that the charge of criminal conspiracy against the accused kishan & madan lal stood proved.22. before we advert to the evidence relied upon by the learned trial judge, we first advert to the law of conspiracy-its definition essential features & proof as it is the primary charge against the accused kishan & madan.23. section 120a ..... is proved by the testimony of the magistrate that the declarant was fit to make the statement even without examination by the doctor the declaration can be acted upon provided the court ultimately holds the same to be voluntary and truthful. a certification by the doctor is essentially a rule of caution and therefore the ..... accused about the beating or dragging from the shop etc which shows that they tried to falsely implicate the accused persons. further that those who were assigned specific acts have already been acquitted by the courts below. as against which no appeal had been filed.16. per contra, the learned public prosecutor strongly supported the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2011 (HC)

Smt. Kumud Bhatt Vs State of Rajasthan and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... ) since 3.4.86 and for last more than seven years, a presumption would must arise in her favor by virtue of section 108 of the evidence act that her husband has been dead. thus viewed, the appellant state therefore have to grant relief to the writ petitioners on the presumption that her husband is ..... of petitioner's husband under rule 19 of the cca rules. even declaration has not been sought from the competent court under section 108 of the indian evidence act that ramesh chand bhatt is dead. cited judgments are distinguishable. writ petition be therefore dismissed. i have heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned deputy ..... of the government servant and further holding such inquiry proceedings without service of pre and/or post initiation of proceedings in order to culminate into order of punishment of removal, both are against the constitutional mandate and principle of natural justice. that being so, the learned single judge has rightly condemned the action of the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2010 (HC)

Bd and P Hotels (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. District Judge, Jhunjhunu and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... in the mardia chemicals ltd.'s case (supra) itself and also by virtue of the amendments effected to sections 13 and 17 of the principal act. the liberty given by the learned single judge to the appellants to resist s.a.no.104 of 2007 preferred by the respondents before the drt on all aspects was duly upheld by the ..... stage of communication of reasons shall not confer any right upon the borrower to prefer an application to the debts recovery tribunal under section 17 or the court of district judge under section 17a.(4) in case the borrower fails to discharge his liability in full within the period specified in sub-section (2), the secured creditor may take ..... jurisdiction of the civil court.3. where there is no express exclusion, the examination of the remedies and the scheme of the particular act to find out the intendment becomes necessary and the result of the inquiry may be decisive. in the latter case, it is necessary to see if the statute creates a special right or a liability and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2010 (HC)

M/S Alpha (India ) and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... the second proviso to clause (2) of article 311, there is no scope for reintroducing it by a side-door to provide once again the same inquiry which the constitutional provision has expressly prohibited. where a clause of the second proviso is applied on an extraneous ground or a ground having no relation to ..... orders are passed by the courts, tribunals and quasi judicial authorities while exercising their inherent powers. in this case, such powers are contained in the sebi act itself. thus, mere passing of ex-parte interim order during pendency of the proceedings cannot mean elimination of principles of natural justice. the petitioners would be ..... herein failed to raise their objections before the board within the stipulated period and straightway approached this court. second proviso to section 11(4) of the sebi act does not eliminate principles of natural justice, rather it provides for an opportunity of hearing to the intermediaries or persons concerned. in the light of aforesaid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2010 (HC)

Sushil Kumar Yadav. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... impugned assessment vide order dt.23/03/1998. in absence whereof, there was no prima facie material available on record before the inquiry officer or disciplinary authority which may hold that petitioner acted negligently or recklessly while in exercise of quasi judicial powers or had omitted prescribed conditions necessary for exercise of quasi judicial powers. ..... v. duli chand (supra) that the decision in union of india v. kk dhawan (supra) being of larger bench, would prevail over judgment of two judges bench in zunjar rao bhikaji nagarkar v. union of india (supra) where the court reverted back to earlier view where disciplinary action could be taken against an ..... the apex court observed ad infra:28. certainly, therefore, the officer who exercises judicial or quasi-judicial powers acts negligently or recklessly or in order to confer undue favour on a person is not acting as a judge. accordingly, the contention of the respondent has to be rejected. it is important to bear in mind that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2010 (HC)

Pratap Singh. Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... , he went to suratgarh and pilibanga. in suratgarh he found pratap singh and took him into police custody and entered rapat roznamcha ex.p/27 and made inquiry from him. on the basis of information received by him he telephonically informed the superintendent of police(rural) alwar about these facts who, in turn, informed ..... section 313 cr.p.c, wherein they admitted their arrest but denied commission of any offence. however, they did not lead any defence evidence.8. learned sessions judge, vide impugned judgment & order dated 20.12.2003, acquitted the accused sarjeet of all the charges whereas present appellant pratap singh, was convicted and sentenced in the ..... copy of driving license and identification card of the deceased were recovered from the accused pratap singh on the basis of information given under section 27 of evidence act. necessary memos and site plan were prepared.5. during investigation, seized clothes of deceased, blood stained soil, and shoes etc. were sent for fsl and after .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //