Jah - Judgment Search Results

Muffakham Jah and anr. Vs. Prince Mukarram Jah Bahadur and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1993(2)ALT396

not be informed about the message. On 2-6-1991 around 12-30 p.m., the 1st respondent along with Princess Manoliya Jah arrived at the premises. The 2nd respondent, Secretary and Additional Secretary of H.E.H. the Nizam's Trust and Mr.

Muffakham Jah Bahadur and ors. Vs. H.E.H. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Ba ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1989AP68

payments in proportion of their monthly allowances. The first respondent H.E.H. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan (Prince Mukrram Jah) who is the present title holder also filed a counter supporting the arrangement pleaded by the other beneficiaries.6.

Nawab Shaqafath Ali Khan and ors. Vs. Nawab Imdad Jah Bahadur and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(3)SC652; 2009(3)SCALE934; (2009)5SCC162; 2009(3)LC1309(SC); 2009AIRSCW2289

in part I, the remaining thirteen sons of the Nizam and the children of his deceased son, Kazim Jah were mentioned in Part II and seventeen daughters have been mentioned in part III of the third schedule.4.

Prince Muffakham Jah Bahadur Vs. Commissioner of Expenditure-tax, Hyde ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2346; [1973]89ITR41(SC); (1973)2SCC403

Matched in: Parties Prince Muffakham Jah Bahadur Vs. Commissioner of Expenditure-tax, Hyderabad

Shazi Jah vs.managing Committee Hamdard Public School and Ors

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9865/2016, CM APPL. 39284/2016 (Exemption) SHAZI JAH Decided on 24th October, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Tamali Wad with Ms. Indrani Ghose, Advs. versus MANAGING

Jah Developers Private Limited and Anr. Vs.state Bank of India

Court: Delhi

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3291/2017 % 1. JAH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. I. S. Alag, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Kumar and

Mukarram Jah Trust for Education and Learning Vs. Assistant City Plann ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(1)ALD11; 2007(1)ALT575

Revenue Authority and pass such other suitable orders.4. The Secretary and Authorised Signatory of the petitioner-trust, M/s. Mukarram Jah Trust for Education and Learning has sworn to the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. It

Prince Azam Jah Vs. Expenditure-tax Officer

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1970]78ITR364(AP)

Writ Petitions Nos. 712 to 714 of 1962 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by Prince Alam Jah Bahadur, hereinafter referred to as the assessee, for the issue of a writ of prohibition or other appropriate

Prince Azam Jah Bahadur Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1968]67ITR757(AP)

Matched in: Parties Prince Azam Jah Bahadur Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, A.P.

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Prince Muffakham Jah Bahadur Chamlijan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2001]247ITR351(SC); JT2001(1)SC144; 2000(8)SCALE210; [2000]Supp5SCR518

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. These are appeals that relate to the same assessee, Prince Muffkham Jah; they are in respect of the Assessment Years 1969-70 to 1975-76 and 1977-78. They raise the same question.