Invited Error - Year 2016 - Judgments

Apr 25 2016 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Htc Engineering (1958) Private Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-25-2016

..... it is an error within the jurisdiction but in later case it is a jurisdictional error which may invite an interference in ..... the petitioner it is further submitted that clause 5 of invitation to tender clearly indicates that the estimated quantities reflected under ..... terms and conditions according to him the clauses embodied under invitation to tender cannot be segregated for the purpose of gathering .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Smt. Asha Vs. State of Karnataka By

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-30-2016

..... 13 in allowing the application filed under section 319 cr p c is an apparent error inviting the revisional jurisdiction of this court vested under section 397 of cr p c 18 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Asha and Others Vs. State of Karnataka by Electronic City Police, rep. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-30-2016

..... 13 in allowing the application filed under section 319 cr p c is an apparent error inviting the revisional jurisdiction of this court vested under section 397 of cr p c 18 ..... court in allowing the application filed under section 319 cr p c is an apparent error inviting the revisional jurisdiction of this court vested under section 397 of cr p c petition .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 2016 (HC)

Thyssenkrupp Industries India Pvt Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, repres ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2016

..... transparency rules 2000 rule 23 petitioner company is a preferred turnkey contractor corporation had invited tender petitioner and third respondent were qualified for the second stage of the tender ..... permitted the petitioner to correct the calculation error instead of declaring them as l2 in this context the learned senior counsel for the petitioner invited the attention of this court section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 2016 (HC)

Girish B. Rai Vs. Kalindi K. Rai and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-11-2016

..... review petition 8 mr bandiwadekar learned counsel appearing for the petitioner invited my attention to the correspondence annexed to the writ petition and ..... was approved it is therefore submitted that that there is an error apparent on the face of order passed by this court ..... only with effect from 22nd january 2009 this court committed an error apparent on the fact of order by holding that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

M/s. Divya Impex, Bengaluru rep by its Authorized Signatory and Others ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-10-2016

..... the question of legality its concern should be whether the tender inviting authority 1 exceeded its powers 2 committed an error of law 3 committed a breach of the rules of natural ..... the case of the petitioners that the 2nd respondent viz commissioner prohibition and excise tender inviting authority prohibition and excise department has issued the impugned tender notification in tender no 1 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 2016 (HC)

G. Shankar Vs. Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Limited and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-08-2016

..... so as to correct the blatant and apparent errors committed by the tender inviting authority tender scrutiny committee or the tender accepting ..... uniform procedure is contemplated in matters relating to the tenders invited by the state of karnataka and its instrumentalities the ..... the ktpp rules 2000 to point out that the tender inviting authority should ensure confidentiality of the process of tender .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 2016 (HC)

Sri. G. Shankar Vs. Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Limited

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-08-2016

..... so as to correct the blatant and apparent errors committed by the tender inviting authority tender scrutiny committee or the tender accepting ..... uniform procedure is contemplated in matters relating to the tenders invited by the state of karnataka and its instrumentalities the ..... the ktpp rules 2000 to point out that the tender inviting authority should ensure confidentiality of the process of tender .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2016 (HC)

M/s. Masaurhi Service Station Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. an ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-07-2016

..... was no mala fide or errors in the resitement of the petitioner at shanti path attention was also invited to the letter dated ..... exercise its writ jurisdiction to enforce contractual obligations l attention was invited to para 98 of ramesh chandra sankla vs vikram cement ..... clear and the residuary clause therein provided for dealers to be invited by advertisement if there were no existing loi holder of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2016 (HC)

Rehana Sultana Begum and Another Vs. Hashmi Syed Mujib

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Aug-11-2016

..... respondent husband the courts below have committed error in refusing the maintenance he would then invite my attention to the full bench judgment ..... union of india reported in 2001 7 scc 740 he would invite my attention to the observations made in paragraphs 34 and 35 ..... per contra ms ansari learned counsel for the respondent husband would invite my attention to the provisions of sections 3 and 4 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Invited Error - Judgment Search Results