Invited Error - Judgment Search Results

Haradhan Rakshit Vs. Girish Chandra Mukerji

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 4Ind.Cas.326

..... sirkar v beni madhub sirkar 24 c 62 1 c w n 36 and we invite the attention of the district judge to the observations at page 73 of the report ..... under section 311 3 it appears to us that the district judge has fallen into error in not accepting the decision of this court which was brought to his notice namely .....

Emperor Vs. Bal Gangadhar Tilak

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR848

and religion of the country that he may point out errors in the measures of public men but he must not

Prentis Vs. Atlantic Coast Line Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

where the petitioner had open to him a writ of error to a higher court of a state in cases where

Dharam Kunwar Vs. Balwant Singh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1908)ILR30All549

..... ceremony performed but it was performed with great pomp and ceremony invitations to amongst others the principal european inhabitants including he collector ..... who made the statement did so withoutfull knowledge or under error sibi imputet it may in the result be unfortunate for ..... him but it would be unjust even though he acted under error to throw the consequences on the person who believed his .....

Government of Bombay Vs. Merwanji Muncherji Cama

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR907

..... real probative force whatever in proof of the maze of difficulties through which this system invites the court to thread its way to a plain conclusion of fact we need only ..... purchase to be decided by complex calculations of this kind involving so much risk of error as to be practically worthless 9 on these grounds then we must hold that the .....

Twining Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

supreme court of the state afterwards in the court of errors and appeals the case was brought here for review and

Prosser Vs. Finn

Court: US Supreme Court

county state of washington for which prosser the plaintiff in error had previously made an entry under what is known as

Adair Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

limitations of their powers it is urged by defendant in error that there is a marked distinction between a power to

St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Ry. Co. Vs. Donohue

Court: US Supreme Court

the land was within the territory in which plaintiff in error hereafter called the railway company was entitled to make indemnity

Winters Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

or decree to join in an appeal or writ of error or be detached from the right by some proper proceeding