Interviewing - Judgment Search Results

Rajnish Kumar and ors. Vs. Chatrapati Sahu Ji Maharaj Medical Universi ...

Court: Allahabad

..... be influenced by many uncertain imponderable factors such as predilections and prejudices of the interviewer his attitudes and approaches his preconceived notions and idiosyncrasies and it is also capable ..... and general address deeper traits of leadership tact forcefulness etc go largely undetected the interview is often in the nature of desultory conversation marking differs greatly from examiner to .....

Cadder (Appellant) Vs. Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland)

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... to salduz did not afford a right to legal representation at interview belgium france the netherlands and ireland are now recognising that ..... his judicial examination was protected by the right to a private interview with his lawyer before the examination at first sight the ..... of such an investigation the man ultimately accused may be interviewed it would unduly hamper the investigation of crime if the .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... some instances where the investigation agencies have leaked the video recordings of narcoanalysis interviews to media organisations this is an especially worrisome practice since the public ..... with situations where media organisations have either circulated the video recordings of narcoanalysis interviews or broadcasted dramatized re constructions especially in sensational criminal cases 213 another .....

Moumita Podder Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... bazar nine persons including the appellant and the respondent no 2 appeared before the interview board the interview board upon evaluation of the inter se merits of all the nine applicants in ..... the methodology of assessment has been designed for ease of quantification each candidate during the interview will be assessed by the selection committee broadly under the following parameters retail outleta .....

Ramesh Kumar Vs. High Court of Delhi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 167(2010)DLT98(SC),JT2010(2)SC1,2010(2)SCALE86,(2010)3SCC104

..... it provided 50 minimum qualifying marks in the written examination as well as in the interview for general category candidates and 45 for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes candidates the relevant ..... yadav and ors v state of haryana and ors air 1987 sc 454 stating that interview can evaluate a candidate s initiative alertness resourcefulness dependableness co operativeness capacity for clear and .....

Kumari Thara Bai Thankachi Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secre ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... record to her credit has executed many prestigious assignments successfully she has been attending interview regularly from 2005 many juniors were promoted was required to get a minimum of ..... submitted that the applicant cannot herself judge that she has performed well in the interview 6 the rules and regulations regarding promotion under flexible complementing scheme applicable to scientific .....

Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Assistant Divisional Mechanical Engineer (Adme)/Co ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... irimee has informed the chief mechanical engineer southern railway chennai that the applicant was interviewed by director irimee on 21 5 2009 but his performance was found very unsatisfactory ..... probationer is relieved for posting after successful completion of posting examinations and after the interview is cleared occasionally if the formalities are completed after posting in their parent railways .....

Anupam Garg Vs. the District Judge Office of District Sessions Judge

Court: Delhi

..... india seeking direction against the respondent to recall modify the result of candidates selected for interview for ldc recruitment test 2009 2 the petitioner is currently pursuing his graduate studies in ..... add an additional requirement qualification that the candidate should also secure minimum marks in the interview therefore this court is of the opinion that prescription of minimum marks by the .....

Sharwan Kumar and ors. Vs. Rpsc and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

..... of the petitioners who have approached the court in time in 2007 either before interview or just after interview have suffered on account of scaling which has already been declared illegal while ..... 1955 of rjs examination 2005 of the petitioners who have obtained more raw marks plus interview marks than the selected and appointed candidates in their respective categories iii all the petitioners .....

Sunil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

..... forest guards and driver the petitioners appeared at the written examination and were called for interview and physical test and were ultimately appointed by the letters dated 13th september 2007 ..... possessed by a candidate for direct recruitment and these nine candidates were not called for interview since the difference between unexpanded and expanded chest measurement in their cases was found to .....