Interval - Judgment Search Results

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Sri Mambarambil Gregory and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(9)SC594; 1995Supp(4)SCC414

orderk ramaswamy j 1 notification acquiring 8 83 hectares of land for the purpose of constructing the dam was published...

T.N. Document Writers' Association represented by Its Secretary Vs. St ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1995Supp(4)SCC415

the text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedt n document writers association represented by its secretary...

Abhilasha and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2000)10SCC237

the text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedit has already been held that an informant cannot...

Bhola Turha Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC1515; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)84; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)183; 1998(1)BLJR424; 1998CriLJ1102; 1998(1)Crimes72(SC); JT1997(9)SC487; 1997(7)SCALE323; (1998)9SCC15

nanavati j 1 the appellant was convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under section 302 ipc on...

R. Venkatakrishnan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(10)SC597; 2009(11)SCALE102; (2009)11SCC737; [2009]96SCL143(SC)

orders 66 all the appellants before us except accused no 5 atul m parekh were at the relevant point of...

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Tulsipur Sugar Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1999(114)ELT784(SC); (2000)10SCC227

order1 we have heard the learned attorney general we are in no doubt that by the order dated 4th november...

indrabali Singh Vs. M. State Marketing Board [Mandi] Bhopal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

indrabali singh versus m p state marketing board mandi m c c no 872 8 8 2012 shri riyaz mohammad...

Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(5)LHSC2857; JT2009(11)SC279; 2009(11)SCALE467; (2009)9SCC551; 2009AIRSCW6309

of criminal procedure is hedged in with limitations requiring the intervention of the court and central government with due application of

Enercon India Ltd., Vs. Aloys Wobben

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... turbine in a corresponding best operational point changing the operational settings at predetermined time intervals in accordance with the external parameters and maximize the power output the external parameter ..... fact shall deviate from the given characteristic curve accordingly a variation at predetermined time intervals according to the claim1 of the impugned patent is an arbitrary variation of .....

A.C. Mathew Vs. Union of India Represented by Secretary, Ministry of P ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... appointment by promotion regulations 1955 clearly uses the expression each committee shall ordinarily meet at intervals not exceeding one year thus giving the intended flexibility rule 4 2 is however very ..... ordinarily be done by the central government in consultation with the state government at the interval of every 5 years emphasis supplied the amended rule however can have only prospective .....