T.N. Document Writers' Association represented by Its Secretary Vs. State of T.N. and Anr. (24.09.1992 - SC) - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

.....constituted under the dspe act its functions are multiple - while acting in terms of the provisions, in particular sections 3 and 5 of the dspe act, it acts as an investigating officer - the act contemplates commission of the offences of the nature specified in the act or those specified in several notifications issued from time to time -in terms of section 3 of dspe act first information reports are required to be lodged - for the said purpose, the c.b.i. which has several branches all over india is an officer incharge of a police station within the meaning of section 154 of the code of criminal procedure - the authority specified in the dspe act, namely the superintendent of police of c.b.i. is an officer entitled to carry out any investigation - only when an investigation is carried out in relation to an offence which has been committed in a state and not in the indian territory or within the territorial jurisdiction of the central government the consent of the state concerned is required to be obtained. bhavesh jayanti lakhani v state of maharashtra & ors. [cr. a. no. 1452/2009 dd 7.8.2009]. 2009 air scw 6309: 2009 (9) scc 551: 2009 (5) lh sc 2857. interpol notice:.....the text below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedt.n. document writers association represented by its secretary v. state of t. n. and anr. commenting on the issue as to the relief given to the appellant by the high court that the document writers should get higher grade typewriting qualification only in any language of english or tamil, the court observed that the rule prescribing such restriction was not unreasonable and directed state government to give adequate opportunity to persons holding licenses in earlier years to qualify as per amended rules.

Judgment:

The Text below is only a summarized version of the order pronounced

T.N. Document Writers Association represented by its Secretary v. State of T. N. and Anr. Commenting on the issue as to the relief given to the appellant by the High Court that the document writers should get higher grade typewriting qualification only in any language of English or Tamil, the court observed that the rule prescribing such restriction was not unreasonable and directed State government to give adequate opportunity to persons holding licenses in earlier years to qualify as per amended rules.