Interpretable - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner Vs. Engle

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to development of the nation s energy reserves in short the commissioner s interpretation anomalously suggests that a congress intent on increasing domestic production by small producers ..... included substantial economic disincentives in the same enabling legislation such an interpretation does not comport with congress effort to increase production by the independent producers .....

Securities Indus. Assn. Vs. Frs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... substantial deference this case presents considerations that counsel against giving full deference to that interpretation the board at the administrative level took the position that commercial paper was ..... as a note or security the board expressed concern that such a broad interpretation might preclude commercial banks from maintaining many of their traditional activities accordingly the .....

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Vs. Nrdc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... concept should be addressed to legislators or administrators not to judges the epa s interpretation of the statute here represents a reasonable accommodation of manifestly competing interests and is ..... convinces us that the agency primarily responsible for administering this important legislation has consistently interpreted it flexibly not in a sterile textual vacuum but in the context of implementing .....

Grove City Coll. Vs. Bell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... administrative regulations promulgated under title vi and the available judicial decisions that had already interpreted those provisions the title vi regulations first issued by the department of health ..... regulations therefore they provide strong support for the view that congress intended an expansive interpretation of the program specific language included in title ix because members of congress .....

ins Vs. Phinpathya

Court: US Supreme Court

..... continuous physical presence requirement it does not argue however that the requirement should be interpreted literally nor does it brief the question whether literally continuous physical presence should ..... language in fact indicates that congress intended the continuous physical presence requirement to be interpreted flexibly the court suggests a contrary conclusion based on two factors first the .....

Escorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1985]57CompCas241(Bom)

..... permission is not necessarily contemplated by the enactment and the provision being susceptible of two interpretations the one which does not make it penal should be accepted 88 the learned attorney ..... of permission subsequent to the purchase that according to him would advance public interest any interpretation that advances public interest as laid down in cit v bhattacharya 1979 118itr461 sc must .....

Sundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (1984)7ITD845(Mad.)

..... reach the subject so must the tax the further submission is even assuming a different interpretation adverse to the taxpayer is possible the construction favourable to the taxpayer must be ..... further pointed out from the above publication ibid that an australian court had occasion to interpret section 9a of the commonwealth employees compensation act 1930 1962 this section provided that where .....

Regan Vs. Time, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rather than prescriptive and mandatory however appellants are unable to suggest any meaningful interpretation of the purpose requirement that would survive constitutional scrutiny if the requirement means ..... general prohibition to accommodate first amendment interests we should not adopt a grudging interpretation of the exceptions but should liberally construe them to effectuate their remedial .....

Firefighters Vs. Stotts

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and private in which demotions or layoffs were then planned it makes little sense to interpret this preliminary injunction to apply to future layoffs that might involve different positions in ..... 294 1982 footnote 4 11 the court s opinion is sufficiently ambiguous to suggest another interpretation the court concludes that the preliminary injunction was improper because it gave respondents something .....

Alcoa Vs. Clp Utility Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the first instance in judicial proceedings we need only conclude that it is a reasonable interpretation of the relevant provisions american paper institute inc v american electric power service corp ..... of the legislative history specifically endorsing the new provisions thus the dissent acknowledges that its interpretation of the phrase same amount of power leads to an inconsistency but claims that .....