Interpretable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interpretable Year: 1965 Page 1 of about 784 results (0.026 seconds)Louisiana Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-08-1965
..... of the sections of the state or federal constitution to be understood and interpreted and what interpretation is to be considered correct there was ample evidence to support the district ..... law footnote 12 a delegate to the 1898 louisiana constitutional convention also criticized an interpretation test because the arbitrary power lodged with the registration officer practically places his decision .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUdall Vs. Tallman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-01-1965
..... statute is in issue deference is even more clearly in order since this involves an interpretation of an administrative regulation a court must necessarily look to the administrative construction of ..... the secretary s construction and thereby defeat any possible claim of detrimental reliance upon another interpretation finally almost the entire area covered by the orders in issue has been developed at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwift and Co. Vs. Wickham
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-22-1965
..... in the supremacy clause primarily involves the comparison of two statutes rather than the interpretation of the constitution therefore as established in ex parte buder 271 u s 461 ex parte ..... occasions when this court has overturned a prior decision especially in matters involving an interpretation of the constitution or where the problem of statutory construction had constitutional overtones an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGriswold Vs. Connecticut
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1965
..... of the constitution no less than due process lend themselves as readily to personal interpretations by judges whose constitutional outlook is simply to keep the constitution in supposed tune ..... use of contraceptives the birth control case poses a troublesome and challenging problem of constitutional interpretation he may find himself saying the law is unconstitutional but why there are two .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-17-1965
..... congress but subject to the limitation that in no event shall the term boundaries be interpreted as extending from the coastline more than three geographical miles into the atlantic ocean or ..... and pacific oceans and the three league limitation in the gulf of mexico did the interpretations of historic boundaries and inland waters become operationally related and any inconsistency thus created between .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheikh Ghulam Rasul Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jan-11-1965
Reported in: (1967)ILLJ365J& K
..... author has given a number of illustrations from english law where certain words have been interpreted differently from their ordinary meaning and where certain words have been taken as non existent ..... air1951ori378 difference of opinion arose between the chief justice and jagannadhadas j with regard to interpretation of certain sections of the hindu women s right to property act the matter was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGunther Vs. San Diego and Arizona Eastern R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-1965
..... doctor committee which found petitioner fit to act as an engineer the board having interpreted seniority and other provisions of the collective bargaining agreement as guaranteeing petitioner s ..... which secured seniority rights together with other provisions of the contract as justifying an interpretation of the contract guaranteeing to petitioner priority in service according to his seniority and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Chandra and anr. Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-22-1965
Reported in: AIR1967All180
..... learned judge then referred to certain rules but rules can never be resorted to for interpreting a statutory provision rules cannot change the meaning of a statutory provision if under the ..... point has already been discussed earlier thus accord ing to the interpretation which interpretation appears to me to be the correct interpretation of the proviso if a first appeal under the un amended .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZemel Vs. Rusk
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-03-1965
..... administrative practice prior to its most recent reenactment in 1926 will support the court s interpretation of the statute moreover the nature of the problem presented by area restrictions makes ..... it had congressional authorization yet in kent v dulles the government pointed to scattered executive interpretations showing that upon occasion the state department believed that it had the authority in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeep Chand JaIn Vs. Board of Revenue
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-1965
Reported in: AIR1966All412
..... the courts while deciding cases do not make law when the courts interpret any law they only explain what the pre existing law is ..... as a wrong exercise of jurisdiction in the light of a subsequent interpretation of law the full bench rested its decision entirely upon a ..... all with the nature or effect of a court s declaration or interpretation of law that case does not afford any assistance to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial