Skip to content


Intellectually - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: intellectually Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 221 results (0.009 seconds)
Feb 08 2008 (HC)

Eureka Forbes Ltd. and anr. Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-08-2008

Reported in: 149(2008)DLT155; 2008(36)PTC210(Del)

..... this appeal fails and is hereby dismissed with costs assessed at rs 5 000 civil intellectual property rights rejection of plaint order vii rule 11 of code of civil procedure 1908 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2008 (SC)

Salim and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-11-2008

Reported in: 2008CriLJ4327; JT2008(8)SC677; 2008(11)SCALE255

..... nay bound to give due weight to a childs ordinary comfort contentment health education intellectual development and favourable surroundings but over and above physical comforts moral and ethical values ..... nay bound to give due weight to a childs ordinary comfort contentment health education intellectual development and favourable surroundings but over and above physical comforts moral and ethical .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2008 (HC)

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-16-2008

Reported in: (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

..... out a prima facie case for injunction against the respondent interim injunction granted intellectual property rights patents infringement thereof relief of ad interim injunction balance of convenience ..... and also without objection fairly for long 5 years therefore interim injunction granted intellectual property rights patents relief of ad interim injunction inadequacy of damages respondent challenged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 2008 (HC)

Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited Vs. Cipla Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-03-2008

Reported in: LC2008(3)384; 2009(39)PTC347(Del)

..... rights in abstract properties viz in domain names there should be no bar to professionals intellectuals creating rights in marks and being permitted to profiteer from them and there is a ..... business effect the change this order shall be operative w e f one month hereof intellectual property rights trade marks infringement of registration of assignment and transmissions of registered trade mark .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 2008 (HC)

Kanhaiya Lal Bansal S/O Late Sri Bangali Mal Vs. Sahitya Bhawan Publis ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-26-2008

Reported in: LC2009(1)376; 2009(41)PTC165(All)

..... trademark said sri ram saran bansal filed a rectification application before the appropriate intellectual property appellate board new delhi making the appellant plaintiff party respondent therein along ..... convenience and irreparable loss the property in the nature of trademark is an intellectual property the partnership business has actually been dissolved leaving aside acceptance of consideration .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 2008 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal and ors. Vs. Rajinder Kumar Aggarwal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-19-2008

Reported in: LC2009(1)187; 2009(40)PTC67(Del)

..... of caste sect are to be considered registrable only upon evidence of distinctiveness the intellectual property appellate board failed to address the issue of distinctiveness and therefore the learned ..... of caste sect are to be considered registrable only upon evidence of distinctiveness the intellectual property appellate board failed to address the issue of distinctiveness and therefore the learned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 2008 (SC)

Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs. Super Cassette Industries Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-16-2008

Reported in: 2008(4)ALD47(SC); 2008(5)BomCR719; JT2008(7)SC11; LC2008(2)129; 2008(37)PTC353(SC); 2008(9)SCALE69; 2008AIRSCW6698; 2008(4)Supreme98; 2008(11)SCALE170; 2008(4)LH(SC)2638; 2008AIRSCW6698; 2008(4)LH(SC)2638

..... parties matter remitted to the board for reconsideration of the matter appeals allowed intellectual property rights copyright compulsory license issuance to more than one broadcaster whether compulsory ..... to more than one broadcaster after proper consideration of each case appeal allowed intellectual property rights copyright compulsory license issuance of relevant considerations what are the relevant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 2008 (HC)

The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford Vs. Na ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-17-2008

Reported in: 2008(106)DRJ482; LC2008(3)402; 2008(38)PTC385(Del)

..... shakespeare s shoulders judge leval further observed that most important areas of intellectual creativity like philosophy literature and sciences are referential and require continuous reexamination ..... shakespeare s shoulders judge leval further observed that most important areas of intellectual creativity like philosophy literature and sciences are referential and require continuous reexamination .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2008 (HC)

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and anr. Vs. Harinder Kohli and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-22-2008

Reported in: 155(2008)DLT56; LC2009(1)274; 2008(38)PTC185(Del)

..... are held disentitled to the injunction prayed for the instant application is accordingly dismissed intellectual property rights trade mark infringement of deceptive similarity plaintiff filed a suit for ..... can differentiate both the movies no infringement has been made out application dismissed intellectual property rights trade mark infringement of delay and acquiescence held false assertions of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2008 (HC)

World Wide Brands Inc. Vs. Smt. Dayavanti Jhamnadas Hinduja,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2008

Reported in: LC2009(2)310

..... said order the petitioner preferred o a nos 15 20 2005 tm ch before the intellectual property appellate tribunal in short the appellate board the appellate board having considered the various ..... the trade mark would cause confusion same was dismissed by the assistant registrar and the intellectual property appellate tribunal hence the present petition whether the high court under article 227 can .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //