Intellectually - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... this grand canyon has been the slow product of the perennial process of cultural interaction intellectual cross fertilization ideological and religious confrontations and meeting and mating of social systems and the ..... but also by extending the scope of his experience it is a right which gives intellectual and creative workers in particular the opportunity of extending their spiritual and .....

Parker Vs. Flook

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 156 55 u s 175 phenomena of nature though just discovered mental processes and abstract intellectual concepts are not patentable as they are the basic tools of scientific and technological ..... stated in the following words phenomena of nature though just discovered mental processes and abstract intellectual concepts are not patentable as they are the basic tools of scientific and technological work .....

Board of Curators, Univ. of Missouri Vs. Horowitz

Court: US Supreme Court

..... committee of the association of the american medical colleges suggesting that the student either lacked intellectual ability or had insufficiently prepared his course work the court specifically noted that there has ..... in the court s opinion the publicizing of an alleged deficiency in the student s intellectual ability removed the case from the typical instance of academic dismissal and called for .....

Fortune Films International Vs. Dev Anand and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1979Bom17; (1978)80BOMLR263

..... work notwithstanding its confluence in the film this persistence of the aesthetic personality of the intellectual property cannot cut down the copyright of the film qua film 23 these words however .....

In Re: S. Mulgaokar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1978)3SCC339; [1978]3SCR162

..... defences that error makes against her power political philosophers and historians have taught us that intellectual advances made by our civilisation would have been impossible without freedom of speech and ..... it champions of human freedom of thought and expression throughout the ages have realised that intellectual paralysis creeps over a society which denies in however subtle a form due freedom .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or even predominant criterion harvard college would lose a great deal of its vitality and intellectual excellence and that the quality of the educational page 438 u s 322 experience offered ..... and financial aid pp 20 et seq cambridge 1960 consequently after selecting those students whose intellectual potential will seem extraordinary to the faculty perhaps 150 or so out of an entering .....

United States Vs. Ceccolini

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 428 u s 433 428 u s 458 459 n 35 1976 as an abstract intellectual proposition this can be buttressed by a plausible rationale since there is at least some ..... few of the many perspectives on a subject which lies at the core of our intellectual and religious heritage while this ancient debate will undoubtedly continue society and the law have .....

Mcdaniel Vs. Paty

Court: US Supreme Court

..... parents claim was that this compulsion interfered with amish religious teachings requiring the deemphasis of intellectual training and avoidance of materialistic goals in sustaining the parents claim under the free exercise .....

N.G. Venkatarathnam Vs. N.S. Nagendra Gupta

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1979Kant83; ILR1979KAR646; 1979(1)KarLJ283

..... advance the remedy and to suppress the mischief and not try to indulge in any intellectual hair splitting and legerdemain in interpreting the words with a view to maintain the mischief .....

Haji C.H. Mohammad Koya Vs. T.K.S.M.A. Muthukoya

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC154; (1979)2SCC8; [1979]1SCR664

..... seriously condemned for their defection had the speech been understood by the public and the intellectuals as promoting hatred or enmity between two parties some comment on this aspect must have .....