Instantly - Judgment Search Results
Handi Instant Foods Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-15-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ1112
G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 150 of 2003 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Piler, Chittoor...
“that the Instant Writ Petition Deserves to Be Dismissed on the Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
CWP No.11734 of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.11734 of 2012 Date of decision :26. 11.2012 Stable Holding (P) Ltd., New Delhi .......Petitioner versus State of Haryana...
“In the Instant Case the Learned Lower Court Which Passed the Ex-par ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
Civil Revision No.445 of 2000 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.445 of 2000 Date of Decision:- 6.3.2014 Chinder Kaur ......Petitioner Versus Nazar Singh & Ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Punj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-29-2014
CRM-M No.15044 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.15044 of 2014. Date of Decision : 29.05.2014. Manjit Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE...
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Hary ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-21-2014
CRM-M No.13525 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.13525 of 2014. Date of Decision : 21.05.2014. Gulshan ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH...
“The Instant Petition Has Been Preferred Under Vs. State of Punjab - ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-28-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-12526 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.05.2014. Kirna Devi & others --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section 438 Vs. the State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
CRM No.M-16074 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-16074 of 2014. Date of Decision : 10.07.2014. Jai Bhagwan ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Punj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-14606 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2014. Balwinder Kumar @ Billu --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Hary ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-14830 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.07.2014. Pulkit Chaudhary --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr.Ankur Malik,...
Boc India Ltd. Vs. Instant Sales Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-17-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Cal275,2007(4)CHN392
ORDERJyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order being No. 29 dated 22nd January, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 6th Court at...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free