Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Sorted by: old Page 6 of about 256 results (0.079 seconds)

Morales Vs. City of Galveston

Court : US Supreme Court

..... been fumigated by the city, without similar incident in recent years. [ footnote 7 ]" the court found that the fumes in the present case came from "chloropicrin, an insecticide which had never been used by the respondent city." [ footnote 8 ] the petitioners question none of these findings here. under these circumstances, we cannot say that it was ..... full. a last "shot" of grain was called for and was released into the bin. the grain in this last shot had been treated with a chemical insecticide, and the petitioners were injured by fumes from the chemical, made noxious by concentration in the closely confined area where they were working. the petitioners brought the present ..... no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [ footnote 1 ] petitioners, of course, received compensation and medical treatment under the longshoremen's and harbor workers' compensation act, 33 u.s.c. 901 et seq., 181 f.supp. at 207. [ footnote 2 ] "14. i find that neither of the respondents knew, or in the .....

Ramesh Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1962)64BOMLR780

..... ,7. do these facts make out a case against the appellant of abetment of the offence of procurator of a minor girl punishable under section 356a of the indian penal code? section 366a was enacted by act xx of 1923 to give effect to certain articles of the international convention for the suppression of traffic in women and children signed by various ..... penal code. it cannot be said that thereby he induces her to go from any place or to do any act with the intent or knowledge contemplated by the section.8. we agree that seduction to illicit intercourse contemplated by the section does not mean merely straying from the path of virtue by a female for the first time. the verb 'seduce ..... r. 60 cal. 1457 aswini kumar roy v. the state : air1955cal100 and nura v. emperor [1934] a.i.r. lah. 227 that the phrase used in section 366 of the indian penal code is 'properly applicable to the first act of illicit intercourse, unless there be proof of a return to chastity on the part of the girl since the first .....

Ramesh Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1908; 1963MhLJ321(SC); [1963]3SCR396

..... out a case against the appellant of abetment of the offence of procreation of a minor girl punishable under s. 366a of the indian penal code section 366a was enacted by act xx of 1923 to give effect to certain articles of the international convention for the suppression of traffic in women and children signed by various nations at ..... bar that in respect of those offences the accused were acquitted and we are not concerned in this case with those offence) - and also for offences punishable under sections 366 and 366a of the indian penal code against nine persons including the appellant, patilba and devidas. in the course of proceedings for commitment to the court of session ..... code. it cannot be said that thereby he induces her to go from any place or to do any act with the intent or knowledge contemplated by the section. 10. we agree that seduction to illicit intercourse contemplated by the section does not mean merely straying from the path of virtue by a female for the first time. the verb .....

Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Coimbatore Division Vs. Stane ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1963]14STC369(Mad)

..... two tea estates as against the column 'for use in manufacture or processing of goods for sale' the following goods were set out: 'machinery and machinery parts, insecticides, iron materials, chemicals, medicines, surgical instruments, diesel oil and lubricating oils.' whether or not machinery would include the tractor is not the question that is before ..... declaration duly signed by the purchasing dealer containing certain prescribed particulars, then the selling dealer is entitled to the lower rate of taxation provided by section 8(1) of the act. turning no to the rules which prescribed the requirements in this regard, the relevant rules are 12 and 13 of the central sales tax ( ..... the department then to say that notwithstanding that the selling dealer has complied with all the requirements, which confer upon him the benefit of section 8(1) of the act, the department can still examine whether the goods that were sold were in fact goods which were utilized by the purchasing dealer in the .....

K.T. Appanna Vs. Corporation of City of Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Kant338; (1963)1MysLJ571

..... the various items of services rendered to the hoteliers. they are as follows:'(a) environmental sanitation;(b) clearance of refuse and garbage;(c) spraying surrounding areas with insecticides;(d) personal services by the examination of food and food handlers working in the establishment;(e) prevention of food adulteration;(f) periodical inspections by the various health ..... to pay the prescribed fee of rs. 300/- in advance. the enhanced fee of rs. 300/-was prescribed by the corporation purporting to act under this clause of sub-section (2) of section 385 by a resolution which it passed to that effect. what the corporation did was to prescribe the fee payable by each person falling ..... to take the view that mr. venkataramiah's argument should not be accepted is the most revealing contrast between the language of sub-section (1) of this section and that of sub-section (2). sub-section (2) makes it clear and expressly states that the rates at which the licence fee should be paid are those 'fixed by .....

Amichand Valanji and ors. Vs. G.B. Kotak and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1966Bom70; (1965)67BOMLR234

..... objects of the central government of smuggling of gold.(37) it is next to be seen whether the rules contrivance of the provisions of s. 44 of the act. section 44 reads.'any authority or person action in the pursuance's of the avocations of life and the enjoyments of the property as little as may be consonant with ..... of the supreme court in lohia's case, : 1960crilj1002 the question that arose there related to the validity of s. 3 of the u.p. special powers act, 1932. that section provided:'whoever, by words, either spoken or written., or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise instigates expressly or by implications any person or class of ..... additional rule making power in central government and proceed to examine whether the gold control rules fall either under clause (23) or (33) of sub -section (2) of s.3 of the act. i have already reproduced these clauses. the arguments of mr. bhabha relating to clause (23) is that this clauses authorities the central government to control .....

Lamont Vs. Postmaster General

Court : US Supreme Court

..... disseminating the same believes will, or which he intends to, prevail upon, indoctrinate, convert, induce, or in any other way influence a recipient or any section of the public within the united states with reference to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign country or a ..... similar one in the future. when the addressee in these cases received the post office notices, they sued to enjoin enforcement of the statute. held: the act, as construed and applied, is unconstitutional, since it imposes on the addressee an affirmative obligation which amounts to an unconstitutional limitation of his rights under the ..... district court for the southern district of new york syllabus these cases challenge the constitutionality of 305(a) of the postal service and federal employees salary act of 1962, which requires the postmaster general to detain and deliver only upon the addressee's request unsealed foreign mailings of "communist political propaganda." under .....

In Re: Muthiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ42

..... impure or adulterated food believed to be pure and not adulterated.3. sales of misbranded articles in violation of the federal food and drugs act and insecticide act.4. violations of state and federal narcotic acts.5. criminal nuisances, including business not known to be injurious to the public health, repose or comfort, and unknown obstructions of highways.6 ..... the petitioners relied on the decision in sherras v. de rutzen l.r. (1895) 1 q..b. 918 where it was held that section 16, sub-section (2) of the licensing act,. 1872, which prohibits a licensed victualler from supplying liquor to a police constable while on duty, does not apply where the licensed victualler bona fide ..... should be for human consumption or use. in public prosecutor v. palanisami : air1965mad98 ramakrishnan, j., has pointed out that the definition of sale in section 2(xiii) of the act is very wide and covers not merely a sale for human consumption, but a sale for analysis as in this case, exposing for sale, or having .....

Graham Vs. John Deere Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the examiner, [ footnote 18 ] so restricted a view of the applicable prior art is not justified. the problems confronting scoggin and the insecticide industry were not insecticide problems, they were mechanical closure problems. closure devices in such a closely related art as pouring spouts for liquid containers are, at the ..... testified that the invention was "the first commercially successful, inexpensive integrated shipping closure pump unit which permitted automated assembly with a container of household insecticide or similar liquids to produce a practical, ready-to-use package which could be shipped without external leakage and which was so organized that ..... into obviousness, rather than into "invention," the general level of innovation necessary to sustain patentability remains unchanged under the 1952 act. pp. 383 u. s. 14 -17. (d) this section permit a more practical test of patentability. the determination of "nonobviousness" is made after establishing the scope and content of .....

Jamuna Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC553; 1967(0)BLJR289; 1967CriLJ541; [1967]1SCR469

raghubar dayal, j.1. jamuna singh, appeals, by special leave, against the order of the patna high court dismissing his appeal and confirming his conviction and sentence under sections 323 and 436 read with s. 109, i.p.c. 2. along with the appellant, four other persons were prosecuted for committing riot and the offence under s. ..... the abetment, and no express provision is made by this code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence. explanation - an act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy or with the aid ..... of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if any act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, and which causes hurt to any person, is done, the abettor shall be liable to imprisonment of either .....