Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1952Kant42; AIR1952Mys42
..... order made thereunder does not affect the ordinary jurisdiction of the city magistrate to commit the accused and this is obligatory as regards the offence under section 5 of prevention of corruption act which, being punishable with, imprisonment of seven years, is triable exclusively by the court of session under schedule ii of the code of criminal ..... favours. order no. 4696-4701/cts. 64-48-2, dated bangalore the 11-12-1948. 1. under sub-section (1) of section 197 of the code of criminal procedure 1904, and section 12 of the prevention of corruption act 1948, sanction is accorded for the prosecution of janab t.a. bashiruddin ahmad assistant commissioner, doing duty as house ..... their convictions in bangalore sessions case no. 6 of 1950-51. accused 1 was charged with committing offences under section 161, i.p.c. and section 5 (1) (d) read with section 5 (2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1948, for having received on the night of 13th october 1948 from one sanjivappa rs. 400/- as illegal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1963Kant338; (1963)1MysLJ571
..... the various items of services rendered to the hoteliers. they are as follows:'(a) environmental sanitation;(b) clearance of refuse and garbage;(c) spraying surrounding areas with insecticides;(d) personal services by the examination of food and food handlers working in the establishment;(e) prevention of food adulteration;(f) periodical inspections by the various health ..... to pay the prescribed fee of rs. 300/- in advance. the enhanced fee of rs. 300/-was prescribed by the corporation purporting to act under this clause of sub-section (2) of section 385 by a resolution which it passed to that effect. what the corporation did was to prescribe the fee payable by each person falling ..... to take the view that mr. venkataramiah's argument should not be accepted is the most revealing contrast between the language of sub-section (1) of this section and that of sub-section (2). sub-section (2) makes it clear and expressly states that the rates at which the licence fee should be paid are those 'fixed by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 1973CriLJ1049
..... may probably occasion a breach or disturb the public tranquillity. it is also clear that, it is the individual who is contemplated in this section and it is the individual act that must be brought home. the only case in which a person can be punished for the wrongs done by others is, where he (or body ..... pursuance of their common object. a mere omnibus statement to that effect that the petitioners had committed various acts is not sufficient to take action against them under section 107 of the criminal procedure code. in fact, as stated earlier those acts themselves have not led to any breach of peace or are likely to occasion breach of peace or disturb ..... m c.c. no. 111/72;likewise the above respondents are apt to commit any act which occasion breach-of peace or disturb the public tranquillity.in view of the above the undersigned' has got sufficient grounds to believe that an offence under section 107, cr.pc is imminent in hirebannimatti village (hadagalli taluk). hence the respondents 1 ta .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1984]57STC343(Kar)
..... a direction to respondent 2 not to levy tax at 4 per cent. 6. the petitioner in w.p. no. 12224 of 1982 is a dealer in fertilisers, sowing seeds, insecticides, etc. he purchases seeds within the state from other dealers and sells the same to others in the course of business. he is carrying on the business in the name ..... point tax is leviable and if they are not 'cereals', then they are goods in respect of which a multi-point tax is leviable. 9. section 5 of the act is the charging section. the relevant part of section 5 prior to 7th september, 1976, reads thus : '5. levy of tax on sale or purchase of goods. - (1) every dealer shall pay for each ..... .p. no. 11441 of 1983 and w.p. no. 12224 of 1982 as illustrative only. 2. the petitioner in w.p. no. 25396 of 1982 is a dealer in fertilisers, insecticides and certified seeds of maize, bajra, jowar, etc., in krishna nagar, sandur taulk. he purchases this seeds from others. he is registered dealer under the karnataka sales tax .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1987KAR1427
..... land survey no. 154/1b. this is of the year 1971. exhibit a-40 is a card issued by the agricultural department for supplying agricultural materials like insecticides etc, to the revision petitioners. both the petition lands are mentioned in that card and it shows that the petition lands are in possession and cultivation of the ..... who would take up such contract would be a tenant. his argument cannot be accepted in view of the said explanation to section 2(34) of the land reforms act.36. section 44 of the land reforms act reads as-'vesting of land in the state government :--(1) all lands held by or in the possession of tenants (including tenants ..... of their father, they are in possession and cultivation of these lands upto date. so claiming, they filed applications in form no. 7 under section 45 of the karnataka land reforms act for conferment of occupancy rights. the tribunal conferred occupancy rights on respondents-3 and 4 in respect of both the lands. the appellants being aggrieved .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1987KAR3762; (1988)ILLJ405Kant
..... for the parties, the learned single judge found considerable force in the construction suggested by the learned counsel for the petitioners on the language of section 34(1) of the act. as there was likelihood of taking a view different from the one expressed in pundarika aithal's case (supra) the learned single judge thought ..... person authorised by the government. it was also contended that the government had delegated the powers of filing a complaint under section 39 of the act to the labour commissioner, that under section 39 of the act the government is entitled to delegate its powers only to an authority subordinate to the state government and not to anybody ..... c., bangalore against the respondents who represent the management : one of the objections taken by the accused before the magistrate was that in view of section 39 of the act, the order of the state government authorising the appellant to file the complaint was not a valid order and hence the complaint was not maintainable; that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1988KAR1005
..... agriculture;(iv) the establishment and maintenance of nurseries and stores of improved seeds and agricultural implements, the production and distribution of improved seeds, pesticides and insecticides and the holding of agricultural shows including cattle shows;(v) the propagation of improved methods of cultivation in the mandal including laying out of demonstration plots ..... in the properties belonging to others.'in sakhavant ali case, : [1955]1scr1004 , the supreme court had occasion to test the validity of section 16 of the orissa municipal act, 1950. section 16 reads as under:'(1) no person shall be qualified for election to a seat in a municipality, if such person......(ix) is ..... months the gurnam singh government fell. then came the gill govt. with the congress support, but could not survive beyond nine months. on august 23, 1968 the president's rule was imposed on the state. the story of government-making is much more bleak elsewhere, bihar presented an extreme example of politics of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 1991ACJ403; ILR1990KAR3181
..... of each of the vehicles should be fixed by the tribunal and an award should be made accordingly.(2) in an application filed under section 110-a of the act, in view section 110-b of the act, it is obligatory for the tribunal to determine the proportion of negligence of each of the drivers and to apportion the amount of compensation ..... or on a direction by the tribunal, in view of rule 346 of the rules.(c) the period of limitation of six months prescribed under sub-section (3) of section 110a of the act does not operate as a limitation for issuing notice to the owner and insurer or driver of a vehicle whose particulars were not furnished in the application ..... and insurers of all the vehicles in view, of rule 343 of the rules?(c) whether the period of limitation of six months prescribed under sub-section (3) of section 110-a of the act operates as a limitation for issuing notice to the owner and insurer or driver of a vehicle whose particulars were not furnished in the application filed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1993]77CompCas266(Kar)
..... of each of the vehicles should be fixed by the tribunal and as award should be made accordingly. (2) in an application filed under section 110a of the act, in view of section 110b of the act, it is obligatory for the tribunal to determine the proportion of negligence of each of the drivers and to apportion the amount of compensation awarded ..... on a direction by the tribunal, in view of rule 346 of the rules. (c) the period of limitation of six months prescribed under sub-section (3) of section 110a of the act does not operate as a limitation for issuing notice to the owner and insurer or driver of a vehicle whose particulars were not furnished in the application ..... and insurers of all the vehicles in view of rule 346 of the rules (c) whether the period of limitation of six months prescribed under sub-section (3) of section 110a of the act operates as a limitation for issuing notice to the owner and insurer or driver of a vehicle whose particulars were not furnished in the application filed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1992]84STC230(Kar)
..... that the said circular included copper sulphate as a heavy chemical. it was declared that copper sulphate was a subject falling within entry no. 117 as 'insecticides'. the authorities under the act were required to regulate the levy and collection of sales tax on this basis. thereafter the revenue assessed the assessee under entry no. 117. the balance ..... not even agreeing to refund the excess collections to its customers itself is an indication that the assessee collected the tax at a higher rate in contravention of section 18; if actually the assessee has collected the tax at a higher rate by abundant caution, there was nothing in the way of the assessee agreeing to ..... refund the said excess to the customers and therefore, it is a clear case of contravention of section 18. 7. section 18-a read with section 18 are enacted to prevent the dealers from misusing the provisions of the act and collecting amounts by way of tax which are not lawfully leviable. the purpose certainly is to deter .....
Tag this Judgment!