Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Sorted by: old Page 14 of about 256 results (0.093 seconds)

Durga Dass Bansal Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1983CriLJ419

..... out in proper bags and sent to the government analyst immediately and so there was no defect in taking and packing of the samples. under sub-section (3) of section 23 of the act, it is the duty of the inspector of effectively seal each portion, of the sample. there is nothing on the record to show that it ..... summoning him as an accused.3. the first contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no standard has been laid down for bleaching powder under the act. it is section 3 (b) which defines the 'drug' thus:drug' includes-(i) all medicines for internal or external use of human beings or animals and all substances intended ..... the extent and subject to the conditions specified in that schedule. section 18 of the act falls under chap. iv of the act. item 12 of sch. 'k' exempts 'substances intended to be used for destruction of vermin or insects which cause disease in human beings or animals, viz. insecticides and disinfectants.25. since i have already held bleaching powder not .....

Raj Kumar Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1983CriLJ706

..... makes out no offence against either of the appellants. it has been argued on behalf of the appellants that the requisite ingredients of offence of abetment as defined in section 107, i.p.c. have not been established against them by the prosecution. elaborating the submission, it has been stressed that the appellants were neither guilty of ..... to rigorous imprisonment for three years and to a fine of rs. 200/- and in default of payment thereof to further rigorous imprisonment for four months each under section 306, i. p. c, they have challenged their conviction and sentence through aforesaid two separate appeals.2. these appeals being disposable by a single judge in the ..... instigation nor of aiding in the commission of the crime either by any act or by an illegal omission as envisaged by the provisions of section 107, i, p. c.7. there appears to be merit in the contention advanced on behalf of the appellants .....

Union Carbide India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1984(17)ELT63(Bom)

..... worldwide, and among various products manufactured and exported is a product known as 'sevin-carbaryl technical'. the product is used in the formulation of various kinds of insecticides pesticides. in or about february 1969, the petitioners commenced importing the said product for their own use against actual users' licences granted in favour of the petitioners ..... supplier and the amount paid by independent importers represented the price under section 14(1)(a) of the act. an appeal against the order dated july 8, 1975 was dismissed on a finding that the appellants did not disclose the basis on which ..... holding that the import by an independent importer showed a commission of 2% payable to the petitioners and that represented the assessable value under section 14(1)(a) of the customs act. in respect of an order dated march 13, 1975, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the petitioners were related to the .....

Vidarbha Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1985]156ITR422(Bom)

..... learned counsel appearing for the assessee, has contended that when section 81(i)(d) refers to 'a society engaged in the purchase of ..... the assessee is entitled to exemption from tax under section 81(i)(d), income-tax act, 1961, in respect of its profits from fertiliser business ? 2. whether the assessee is entitled to exemption from tax under section 81(i)(d), income-tax act, 1961, in respect of its profits from the sale of insecticides to non-members ?'8. mr. thakar, the ..... the assessee was merely an agent and the tribunal was, therefore, right in taking the view that the assessee was not entitled to the exemption under section 81(i)(d) of the act. the first question referred must, therefore, be answered in the negative and against the assessee.11. so far as the second question is concerned, the .....

Central Paints Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1983)34CTR(MP)287; [1984]146ITR212(MP)

..... as set out in the statement of the case are as follows :the assessee is a limited company and is carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of insecticides and paints. during the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1974-75, the assessee claimed deduction of a sum of rs. 50,962 under the head 'sales ..... part and parcel of the express or implied terms and conditions of the business of the assessee and, therefore, cannot be termed as entertainment in the context of section 37(2b) of the act, and, therefore, the tribunal was not justified in disallowing the said deduction. he placed reliance upon a division bench decision of this court in cit v. ..... commissioner (appeals) allowed a sum of rs. 36,500 and sustained a disallowance of rs. 14,462 holding that the same is hit by the provisions of section 37(2b) of the act. on further appeal by the assessee, the tribunal maintained the order passed by the commissioner (appeals). the assessee claimed deduction of rs. 80,112 on account of .....

In Charge Production, Haryana State Co-operative Supply and Marketing ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1595

..... where the sub-standard fertilizer is sold ultimately. section 23 of the insecticides act, 1868 is as follows :-persons bound to disclose place where insecticides are manufactured or kept:-every person for the time being in charge of any premises where any insecticide is being manufactured or is kept for sale ..... or distribution shall on being required by an insecticide inspector so to do, be legally bound to disclose to the insecticide ..... in the court of judicial magistrate, sultanpur lodhi against the proprietors of guru nanak khadstore, sultanpur lodhi and the petitioner under section 12a of the essential commodities act read with section 13 (1) (a) of the fertilizer control order 1957, (hereinafter called as the fertilizer order). the judicial magistrate has .....

Veluswamy and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC832; 1983(1)SCALE649; (1983)3SCC493

..... the morning in the garden of the deceased katturaja at village naickenpalayam as he on his own showing had left his house at village kettiniallapudur for pollachi to buy insecticides for his garden. we are not impressed with this submission. it is but common knowledge that when a person leaves a village for the the town, it is ..... in the prosecution evidence that p.w. 1. masayappa gounder, uncle of the deceased katturaja had left his house in kettimallapudur on his way to pollachi to buy insecticides for his gardenand he happened to be present in the garden of the deceased katturaja at naickenpalayam talking to p.w. 6 smt. velliammal and p.w. 3 durai ..... by his finding and sentence dated december 11, 1974 which have been confirmed by the high court in appeal. the other appeal is under section 2 of the supreme court (enlargement of criminal appellate jurisdiction) act, 1970 preferred by the appellants 3, 6 and 7 who had been acquitted by the learned sessions judge on the ground that there was .....

ins Vs. Chadha

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for the judicial review of all final orders of deportation . . . made against aliens within the united states pursuant to administrative proceedings" under 242(b) of the act. section 106(a) includes all matters on which the final deportation order is contingent, rather than only those determinations made at the deportation page 462 u. s. 921 hearing. ..... ., supp. v)] (rules or regulations promulgated by the administrator of the environmental page 462 u. s. 1011 protection agency under the federal insecticide, fungicide and rodenticide act may be disapproved by concurrent resolution)." "42. omnibus budget reconciliation act of 1981, pub.l. no. 97-35, 533(a)(2), 1107(d), 1142, 1183(a)(2), 1207, 95 stat. 357, ..... v. valeo, 424 u. s. 1 , 424 u. s. 108 -109 (1976); united states v. jackson, 390 u. s. 570 , 390 u. s. 585 (1968). [ footnote 8 ] without the provision for one-house veto, congress would presumably retain the power, during the time allotted in 244(c)(2), to enact a law, in accordance with .....

Ruckelshaus Vs. Monsanto Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... an application to stay, pending appeal, an injunction of the district court -- which held unconstitutional, and enjoined enforcement of, provisions of the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act that authorize manufacturers seeking registration of pesticides with the environmental protection agency (epa) to use test data submitted by an earlier registration applicant, and ..... . in addition, the administrator has not been particularly expeditious in seeking a stay or in pressing his appeal. justice blackmun, circuit justice. the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act (fifra), 7 u.s.c. 136 et seq. (1982 ed.), as amended in 1978, 92 stat. 819, requires pesticide manufacturers to register ..... its decision on an evaluation of test data concerning the product's effectiveness and potential dangers. these data typically are submitted by the pesticide's manufacturer. section 3(c)(1)(d) of fifra, 7 u.s.c. 136a(c)(1)(d) (1982 ed.), provides, however, that test data submitted in .....

Union Carbide India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1983)(14)ELT2443TriDel

..... paper-board impregnated, coated...' under heading no. 48.07 and it goes on to say 'the heading also covers some papers impregnated with insecticides and chemicals'. thus, it would be evident that the ambit of chapter 48 is very wide, wide enough to cover paper impregnated and ..... the classification by the customs authorities has to be done according to the tariff. a look at chapter 48 of the customs tariff act shows that it has only one heading i.e., 48.01/21 under which the goods have been assessed and disputed by the ..... goods which are called by the appellant 'film laminate' are classifiable under heading 48.01/21 of the first schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975 (ict) as paper (as decided by the authorities below) or under heading 39.01/06 in the group of plastic goods ..... 1. this is a revision application filed before the central government which, under section 131-b of the customs act, 1962, stands transferred to the tribunal to be disposed as if it were an appeal presented before .....