Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Page 22 of about 256 results (2.039 seconds)

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. M.P. Agro Pesticides Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ7

..... construed not in any technical or scientific sense, but they must be understood as used in common parlance and in commercial language.9. the insecticides act, 1968 is intended to regulate activities in connection with insecticides. section 3(a) defines insecticides as :'(e) 'insecticide' means -(i) any substance specified in the schedule; or(ii) such other substances (including fungicides and weedicides) as the central government may, after ..... controverted by the revenue according to which b.h.c. 50% w.d.p. is an insecticide coming under the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 and is not medicine coming under rule 24(ii)(a), or drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, or the medicine and toilet preparations (excise duties) act, 1955, (no. 16 of 1955). it has to be noticed that the expression 'medicine' or .....

Murli Manohar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1295

v.m. jain, j.1. this is a petition under section 482, crpc, for quashing the criminal complaint under sections 3k(i), 9, 17, 18, 21(b), 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act) read with rules 16 and 19 of the insecticides rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the rules) and for quashing ..... of all consequent proceedings, arising out of the said complaint.2. it was alleged that m/s madhu sudan industries was a manufacturing industry, manufacturing different types of insecticides ..... state of punjab, 1997(2) recent criminal reports 99, it was held by this court that it was obvious from plain reading of sub-section (1) of section 33 of the act that merely being the responsible person was not enough. he should be responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company. .....

B.B. Nagpal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas596(P& H)

..... because he happened to be the secretary of the company. in the absence of any material connecting the petitioner with the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, it is clear that prosecution against him would be an abuse of the process,of the court. no useful purpose would be served to ..... the secretary of the company and is responsible for this offence. it is a conspicuously vague assertion and consequently it becomes difficult to artract sub-section (1) to section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968.5. learned counsel appearing for the state of haryana in that event, urged that the petitioner is a responsible officer and under sub ..... the proceedings taken thereto.3. notice of the petition had been issued to the state of haryana. needless to say it contested the said petition. section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, deals with the eventualities where offences are committed by companies. the same runs as under :' (1) whenever an offence under this .....

The Director, Agriculture and anr. Vs. Gurmukh Mal Shibba Mal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)117PLR249

..... the view taken by the division bench in criminal misc. no. 10836-m of 1990 (mewa singh v. pirthipal singh and ors.), where a sample under the insecticides act, 1968 was sent to the central laboratory in the first instance, thus, depriving the accused of his right to get it tested. court relying upon the decision in ram ..... declare a commodity as essential commodity is not in dispute. it is also not in dispute that the central government in exercise of its powers conferred by section 3 of the act has made the order known as the fertilizer control order, 1985. as noticed earlier control order deals with the various facets, namely, price control, ..... the strength for the foreign multinationals, the nature of injuries and damages, and the limited but significant right of participation of the victims as contemplated by section 4 of the act, the act cannot be condemned as unreasonable.'16. so, whereas law is almost consistent that various enactments have to be tested on the touch stone i.e. .....

K.G. Pappu Son of Sh. K.A. Govindan Vs. the State of Punjab Through Ch ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2985

..... the act) against the dealer, distributor and manufacturer of the said insecticide, judicial magistrate 1st class took cognizance and summoned the accused for 8-5-1991 by order dated 4-3 ..... and took a sample of insecticide, which on analysis was found to be misbranded. after serving show cause notice and copies of analyst's report upon the manufacturer, distributor and dealer and after obtaining sanction for prosecution. shri joginder singh boparai filed a complaint (annexure p-1) under sections 3(k), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act. 1968 (hereinafter referred to as .....

Arvind Kumar Tyagi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2023; 2006(4)WLC352

..... no. 1 arvind kumar tyagi is its employee. license under section 13 of the insecticides act, 1968 was obtained. the sample was taken on 21.7.1998 by the insecticide inspector and on examination it was found that it does not conform to the relevant prescribed ..... present misc. petition under section 482 cr.p.c. by petitioners arvind kumar tyagi and m/s. jai shree agro industries ltd. seeks quashing of the proceedings initiated against them.2. briefly stated the relevant facts giving rise to this petition are that petitioner no. 2 m/s. jai shree agro industries ltd. is a pesticide (insecticide) manufacturing industry and petitioner ..... this court, the proceedings are liable to be quashed.8. consequently, this petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings instituted on the basis of the complaint filed by the insecticide inspector against the petitioners are hereby quashed. .....

Asiatic Agro Product Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2008)14VST230(All)

..... had been paid. it was further submitted that in case, raw material had been used in the manufacturing of insecticides and pesticides, the manufactured product would not be liable to tax because the applicant was holding the eligibility certificate under section 4a of the act.3. in view of the above, it was submitted that there was no bad intention on the part ..... are that the applicant established a new unit for the manufacturing of insecticides and pesticides and was holding eligibility certificate under section 4a of the act and, therefore, its turnover of insecticides and pesticides were exempted. the applicant was also registered under the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the central act') and was entitled to purchase raw material at concessional rate of .....

Agarwal Agencies and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3426

..... on 20th jan., 1994 insecticides inspector shri mani ram tomar collected sample of methyl parathion 2% d. p. from the shop of m ..... . mathur, j.1. by way of instant petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, the petitioners seek to quash the order dated 8-1-1999 passed by judicial magistrate, pilibanga taking cognizance against the petitioners for offence under sections 17 and 18 read with section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968.2. briefly stated, the facts of the case are that .....

Present: Mr. N.K. Manchanda Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . manchanda, advocate for the petitioner. r.p. nagrath, j.this petition has been filed under section 482 cr.p.c. for quashing complaint no.14-2 under sections 3 (k) (i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under section 29 of the insecticide act, 1968 and rule 27 (5) of the insecticide rules, 1971 and the summoning order dated 08.01.2008 (for short to be described as ..... 'the act') 2. it is stated that petitioner was impleaded as accused no.4 in the complaint .....

New Nandi Seeds Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) X ...

Court : Gujarat

..... rejected lots and losses at processing are returned to farmers only after the foundation seeds are certified as conforming to specifications, the lots are subjected to treatment with insecticides (cell phose, quick phose) and pesticides (thiram and barastin) at the time of packing. the company had filed certificates issued by the seed certification agency and ..... being sown and achieving germination,but in that form they retain the dual utility of being foodgrains as well as seeds. by process of coating and applying insecticides, other chemicals and poisonous substances to the foodgrain meant to be utlised as seeds, one of its basic character, i.e. its consumption as food by ..... and contended that the process is not identical to the case of navbharat seeds (p) ltd., and therefore, assessee is not entitled to deduction under sec. 80ia of the it act. mr. mehta further contended that at least 10 employees are there, and therefore, even if it is a manufacturing process, they are not entitled to .....