Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Page 15 of about 256 results (4.883 seconds)

Jai Chemical and anr. Vs. Government of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)112PLR580

..... on the allegations that a sample of insecticide monocrotophos of batch no. gc-06 was drawn from the premises of ..... sarojnei saksena, j.1. the petitioners have filed this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure for quashing the complaint annexure p-1 dated february 10,1994, filed against them under section 29(1) and 3(k)(i) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter in short, the act).2. the petitioners' contention is that complaint has been filed against them alongwith other accused persons .....

Syngenta Crop Protection Pvt. Limited Rep. by Its Commercial Manager a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD683; 2007(6)ALT1; 2007CriLJ4773

..... of the notification dated 25-07-2007, issued by the government of andhra pradesh, the 1st respondent herein, in exercise of powers under section 27 of the insecticides act, 1968 (for short 'the act); is challenged.2. the petitioners are the manufacturers, or distributors, as the case may be, of different varieties of ..... insecticides. through the impugned notification, the 1st respondent prohibited the supply, distribution, sale, and use of insecticides, known as 'synthetic pyrethroids', for a period of 60 days, in the state of ..... in the state of andhra pradesh, cannot be supported either in law, or on facts. he contends that the power under section 27 of the act can be exercised, only where the use of insecticides is found to have resulted danger to human beings and animals, and such a reason was not even stated in the .....

Abhey Yograj Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2443

..... as an accused because he happened to be the secretary of the company. in the absence of any material connecting the petitioner with the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968, it is clear that prosecution against him would be an abuse of the process of the court. no useful purpose would be served to allow the ..... judge, sirsa, confirming the aforesaid order. the petitioner has also sought quashing of the proceedings qua him and the process issued against him in complaint under section 29(1) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and the other consequential proceedings pending in the trial court.2. the brief facts of the case are that a complaint (annexure p-3) under .....

State of Punjab Vs. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)97; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)197; 1996(4)Crimes169(SC); JT1996(10)SC480; 1996(8)SCALE224; (1996)11SCC613; [1996]Supp7SCR807

..... to the insecticide inspector to enter and search, at all reasonable times and with such assistance, if any, as he considers necessary any ..... conjoint reading of section 21, 22 and 24 of the act, we are of the view that ultimate conclusion to quash the complaint, in the circumstances, is right. the substance of the question is: whether the appellant has complied with the statutory requirements envisaged under section 22 read with section 24(3) and (4) of the act? section 21 of the insecticides act, 1968 (for short, the 'act') gives power .....

Travancore Chemical and Mfg. Co. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (1997)(89)ELT136Tri(Chennai)

..... . "pesticides are classified according to the type of organisms they attack; for example, substances that kill insects are known as insecticides; agents that kill fungi are known as fungicides." (encyclopedia americana, vol. 21, page 655). as per section 3(e) of the insecticides act, 1968, 'insecticide' is defined to include any substance specified in the schedule. copper-sulphate is an item listed in the schedule for ..... the purpose of section 3(e) of the act. the appellate tribunal has also stated that the order issued by the government of kerala .....

Mohan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2623

..... judicial magistrate, nohar whereby he rejected the application of the petitioner for dropping the proceedings against him pending in his court under section 17(1)a r/w section 29(1)a of the insecticides act, 1968.2. mr. bhansali, learned counsel for the petitioner, pointing out that the petitioner has been denied the right of retesting of ..... notify to the inspector his intention to adduce evidence in controversion of the report. the provisions of the section 25 of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 are identical to the provisions of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968.10. in view of the fact that the petitioner has been deprived of his right of retesting of ..... the sample by the central insecticides laboratory, despite his request to get it examined by the said laboratory, the proceedings .....

Jindal Brothers and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3691

..... for quashing of complaint dated 2-4-1992 (annexure p-7) filed by baldev singh, insecticide inspector against the petitioners under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 read with rule 27(5) of the insecticides rules, 1971 pending in the court of judicial magistrate, gidderbaha.2. the facts as narrated ..... in the complaint may be briefly recapitulated.on 9-9-1991, insecticide inspector, gidderbaha visited the shop ..... vide annexure p-3 a request was made to the chief agricultural officer, faridkot to send the counter sample for testing to the central insecticides laboratory under section 24(4) of the insecticides act. this request of the petitioners was not acceded to by the chief agricultural officer. on 3-12-1991, petitioner no. 1 presented .....

M/s Cheminova India Ltd. Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the respondent no.2 the 1 slp(crl.) no.4144 of 2020 quality control inspector, bhikhiwind, district tarn taran, punjab for offences under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33, punishable under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (for short, the act ), was dismissed. the petition was allowed by the high court for other accused, who was working as godown incharge, and quashed the ..... , attari, district amritsar under 1 [email protected].(crl.)no.4102 of 2020 section 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) read with rule 27(5) of the insecticides rules, 1971.3. on 10.02.2011, insecticide inspector, attari, district amritsar, inspected the premises of firm m/s. navneet singh on .....

Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Government of A.P. Vs. Tropi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD243; 1999(5)ALT512

..... . intending to carry on business in andhra pradesh viz., supply of insecticides, the respondent approached ..... insecticide with its registered office at chennai. it is registered with the central board of insecticides and is having a valid and subsisting registration certificate, issued under section 9 of the insecticides act, 1968, (central act 46 of 1968) (for short 'the act'). it has also obtained a licence under section 13 of the act for manufacture of the permitted insecticides ..... in the state of andhra pradesh immediately. aggrieved thereby the respondent filed the writ petition.3. on an analysis of the insecticides act, 1968 and the inspecticides rules, 1971, the learned single judge found that the 'principal certificate' in terms of the statutory rules is .....

M/S Chandan Pesticides and Another Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... against the petitioner m/s chandan pesticides and another without examining above facts or making any specific observation with regard to their liability under section 30(3) of the insecticides act, 1968. the initiation of criminal proceedings against any person should not be taken lightly. before launching the prosecution, the government officials/sanctioning authority ..... seeking quashing of complaint titled state of punjab versus m/s chandan pesticides and others . filed for the offence punishable under section 29 read with sections 3(k).17, 18 and 33 of insecticides act, 1969. sachin mehta201408.02 15:53 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm-m-14989 of ..... is whether the liability of petitioners is prima facie made out as per provisions of section 30(3) of the insecticides act which provides as follows:- (3) a person not being an importer or a manufacturer of an insecticide or his agent for the distribution thereof, shall not be liable for a contravention of .....