Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Page 25 of about 3,410 results (0.271 seconds)

V. Chandru and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1676; ILR2002KAR1205; 2002(2)KarLJ425

..... before the court, the expiry date of the insecticide was already over and sending of the sample to the central insecticides laboratory at that late stage would be of no consequence. therefore, in view of section 24(3) and 24(4) of the insecticides act, the report of the insecticide analyst was not conclusive. a valuable right had ..... been conferred on the accused to have the sample tested from the central insecticides laboratory and in the circumstances of the case the accused have ..... why in the form prescribed for submission of the report by the insecticide analyst, the dates of manufacture of the article and the expiry date are mentioned.section 30 provides for defences which may or may not be allowed in prosecution under the act. section 30(1) only prescribes in effect that ignorance would be no defence .....

S.A. Jayanarayana Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3245; 2003(4)KarLJ231

..... before the court, the expiry date of the insecticide was already over and sending of the sample to the central insecticides laboratory at that late stage would be of no consequence. therefore, in view of section 24(3) and 24(4) of the insecticides act, the report of the insecticide analyst was not conclusive. a valuable right had ..... been conferred on the accused to have the sample tested from the central insecticides laboratory and in the circumstances of the case the accused have ..... why in the form prescribed for submission of the report by the insecticide analyst, the dates of manufacture of the article and the expiry date are mentioned. section 30 provides for defences which may or may not be allowed in prosecution under the act. section 30(1) only prescribes in effect that ignorance would be no defence .....

Mohan Lal and Etc. Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1976

..... by the insecticide inspector (chief agricultural officer), ferozepore, and, the consequent proceedings taken on the ..... (amar lal and anr. v. state and ors.), under section 482 of the criminal p.c. (hereinafter referred to as 'the code') relate to quashment of complaints under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18 and 33, punishable under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') read with rule 27(5) of the insecticide rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules'), filed .....

Godrej Agrovet Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... is pending in the court of jmfc badnapur. the case is filed by respondent no.2, public servant for offences punishable under various sections of insecticides act, 1968 and rules framed under the act. both sides are heard. 2] copy of the complaint given by public servant shows that on 31/7/02, the inspector appointed under ..... was containing 33.74% of the substance as against 36% s.l. shown on the label. thus, the insecticide was found to be misbranded as per the provision of section 3(k) (1) of insecticides act, 1968. after collecting the information from rama sales corporation, notices were issued to all the accused who include manufacturer and private ..... be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly. 7] the aforesaid provision shows that the insecticides act, 1968 has additional provision and that makes distinction between the provisions of this act and the provision of section 141 of n.i.act. further, the documents like reply given by shri r.k.bansal shows that he had personal .....

Mr. Sudhir Bhatia and ors. Vs. M/S Midas Hygiene Industries (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT639

..... were in fact using the word magic laxman rekha since 1989. the appellant claimed to be manufacturing under a license issued by collector/licensing authority, dnh(ut) and insecticides act, 1968 and in pursuance to the permission to sell the said product in the state of maharashtra by the director, inputs and quality control, commissionerate of agriculture, maharashtra state ..... and action of infringement of trademark are totally different in nature. in cases of trademark it was a claim based on violation of statutory right under section 21 of the act while the claim of passing off was based on deceit and similarity of products. the learned counsel also referred to a recent judgment of the ..... the manager of the said appellants was caught red-handed and the duplicate goods were seized. subsequently appellant no. 1 was charged for commission of offences under section 120, 465 and 489 of the indian penal code, which case is stated to be still pending. it is further stated in the plaint that in the .....

Kisan Beej Bhandar, Abohar Vs. Chief Agricultural Officers, Ferozepur ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1990Supp(1)SCC111

..... petition by the high court where he had disputed the cancellation of his licence granted under the insecticides act, 1968.3. the short facts which are no more in dispute are these : the appellant had a dealer's licence under the act to deal in insecticides. the chief agricultural officer, ferozepur, cancelled this licence by order dated july 15, 1982, on ..... of the appellant. unless he had any other source of information about misbranding and it has not been established the appellant is entitled to the protection of sub-section (3). in the facts once the appellant's contention that it was a sealed tin intact has been found, the burden that lay on him under the ..... provisions of sub-section (3) had been satisfactorily discharged, even in the matter of considering the question of cancellation of licence and, therefore, his licence should not have been cancelled. we .....

Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner (Aa) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(236)ELT425(SC); JT2009(7)SC1; 2009(4)SCALE666; 2009(3)LC1550(SC); (2009)25VST271(SC); 2009AIRSCW6376:2009(4)Scale666.

..... the writ petition;iii) to declare that the sales turnover of products falling within the description insecticides and pesticides which are manufactured under licence under the insecticides act and falling within the description of entry 44(5) of iii schedule of kvat act is liable to be taxed only at 4% and levy of tax at 12.5% is ..... a specified period, at the rate of four per cent at all points of such transfer.5. the revenue, however, contends that section 6(1)(d) shall apply. clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 6 reads thus:(d) in the case of goods not falling under clauses (a) or (c) at the rate of 12. ..... , electric or 8516.79.20electronic mosquito repellents,gadgets and insect repellents,devices and parts and accessoriesthereof._______________________________________________________4. according to the appellant, in this case section 6(1)(a) of the act would be applicable, the relevant portion whereof reads as under:6. levy of tax on sale or purchase of goods.-(1) every dealer whose .....

Mr. Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal, Chairman Emeritus of Nocil Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR1880

..... gupta on behalf of nocil. according to the complainant the nocil has replied to the secretary, central insecticides board, new delhi on 6th august 1984 that they had not secured a certificate of registration under the insecticides act either for import or manufacture of indigenous manufacture of glyphosate. it has been admitted that the distribution of ..... legal adviser and the secretary of the company and therefore was not covered by a definition of 'officer in default' as provided in section 5 of the companies act, set aside the order of issuance of process against the said accused. the learned revisional court however upheld the order of issuing process so ..... third party and marketing the same with a deceptive name 'weedall' without the consent of the complainants and therefore committed the offences punishable under the aforesaid sections.3. on the complaint being presented, the learned magistrate vide order dated 20th june 2006 found that the offences were not disclosed in the complaint .....

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

..... minerals, licence is necessary under the off-shore areas mineral (development & regulation) act, 2002. to manufacture, sale, purchase, possession, consumption or use of intoxicant for ..... is mandatory under section 22 of the banking regulation act, 1949. under the cantonments act, 2006, licence is mandatory for establishment of a private market or slaughter house in the cantonment area. to carry on food business licence under section 31 of the food safety & standards act, 2006 is mandatory. to manufacture, sale and distribution of insecticides, licence is mandatory under section 13 of the insecticides act, 1968. to explore .....

The State of Punjab Through Secretary Agriculture, Punjab Govt. and an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1990)97PLR696

..... ' taken from the plaintiff-messers : dharni new zimindari khad store for analysis to the central insecticides laboratory, faridabad.2. having been granted a licence for the purpose under the insecticides act 1968 (herein referred to as 'the act'), the plaintiffs are dealing in the storage and sale of insecticides and pesticides. it appears, that on a sample of 'butochlor' 50 per cent e.c. being marketed ..... which can be imposed in respect of the manufacture, sale and storage of insecticides. section 22 empowers insecticides inspectors to take samples of insecticides and send them for analysis to the insecticide analyst according to sub section (6) of section 22 of the act the insecticide inspector, besides sending one part of the sample to the insecticides analyst, is also required to produce the second part of it before the .....