Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Page 22 of about 3,410 results (0.242 seconds)

The Director, Agriculture and anr. Vs. Gurmukh Mal Shibba Mal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)117PLR249

..... the view taken by the division bench in criminal misc. no. 10836-m of 1990 (mewa singh v. pirthipal singh and ors.), where a sample under the insecticides act, 1968 was sent to the central laboratory in the first instance, thus, depriving the accused of his right to get it tested. court relying upon the decision in ram ..... declare a commodity as essential commodity is not in dispute. it is also not in dispute that the central government in exercise of its powers conferred by section 3 of the act has made the order known as the fertilizer control order, 1985. as noticed earlier control order deals with the various facets, namely, price control, ..... the strength for the foreign multinationals, the nature of injuries and damages, and the limited but significant right of participation of the victims as contemplated by section 4 of the act, the act cannot be condemned as unreasonable.'16. so, whereas law is almost consistent that various enactments have to be tested on the touch stone i.e. .....

K.G. Pappu Son of Sh. K.A. Govindan Vs. the State of Punjab Through Ch ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2985

..... the act) against the dealer, distributor and manufacturer of the said insecticide, judicial magistrate 1st class took cognizance and summoned the accused for 8-5-1991 by order dated 4-3 ..... and took a sample of insecticide, which on analysis was found to be misbranded. after serving show cause notice and copies of analyst's report upon the manufacturer, distributor and dealer and after obtaining sanction for prosecution. shri joginder singh boparai filed a complaint (annexure p-1) under sections 3(k), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act. 1968 (hereinafter referred to as .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Devidas Kishanrao More and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 2, accused shivaji had caught neck of the deceased narayan in the courtyard of house. he sat on the person of deceased narayan. there was endrine i.e. insecticide in bottle, in the hand of accused devidas, and accused vishnu was also present there. thereafter, pw-2 went to call his brother venkati. he narrated incident ..... father of the complainant namely narayan and as a result of it, narayan died. accordingly, offence was registered bearing crime no.78/1995 for the offence punishable under section 302 r/w. 34 of i.p. code. after investigation, the charge sheet was filed, and after full-fledged trial, the trial court acquitted the respondents. hence ..... the case is vitiated by some manifest illegality or the conclusion recorded by the court below is such which could not have been possibly arrived at by any court acting reasonably and judiciously and is, therefore, liable to be characterised as perverse, then, to prevent miscarriage of justice, the appellate court is obliged to interfere. ? .....

Arvind Kumar Tyagi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2023; 2006(4)WLC352

..... no. 1 arvind kumar tyagi is its employee. license under section 13 of the insecticides act, 1968 was obtained. the sample was taken on 21.7.1998 by the insecticide inspector and on examination it was found that it does not conform to the relevant prescribed ..... present misc. petition under section 482 cr.p.c. by petitioners arvind kumar tyagi and m/s. jai shree agro industries ltd. seeks quashing of the proceedings initiated against them.2. briefly stated the relevant facts giving rise to this petition are that petitioner no. 2 m/s. jai shree agro industries ltd. is a pesticide (insecticide) manufacturing industry and petitioner ..... this court, the proceedings are liable to be quashed.8. consequently, this petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings instituted on the basis of the complaint filed by the insecticide inspector against the petitioners are hereby quashed. .....

Asiatic Agro Product Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2008)14VST230(All)

..... had been paid. it was further submitted that in case, raw material had been used in the manufacturing of insecticides and pesticides, the manufactured product would not be liable to tax because the applicant was holding the eligibility certificate under section 4a of the act.3. in view of the above, it was submitted that there was no bad intention on the part ..... are that the applicant established a new unit for the manufacturing of insecticides and pesticides and was holding eligibility certificate under section 4a of the act and, therefore, its turnover of insecticides and pesticides were exempted. the applicant was also registered under the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the central act') and was entitled to purchase raw material at concessional rate of .....

Agarwal Agencies and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3426

..... on 20th jan., 1994 insecticides inspector shri mani ram tomar collected sample of methyl parathion 2% d. p. from the shop of m ..... . mathur, j.1. by way of instant petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, the petitioners seek to quash the order dated 8-1-1999 passed by judicial magistrate, pilibanga taking cognizance against the petitioners for offence under sections 17 and 18 read with section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968.2. briefly stated, the facts of the case are that .....

Present: Mr. N.K. Manchanda Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . manchanda, advocate for the petitioner. r.p. nagrath, j.this petition has been filed under section 482 cr.p.c. for quashing complaint no.14-2 under sections 3 (k) (i), 17, 18 and 33 punishable under section 29 of the insecticide act, 1968 and rule 27 (5) of the insecticide rules, 1971 and the summoning order dated 08.01.2008 (for short to be described as ..... 'the act') 2. it is stated that petitioner was impleaded as accused no.4 in the complaint .....

Lark Trading Co. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1995)(76)ELT381TriDel

..... actual users. it was alleged that the goods had been imported without a valid import license and without any registration under the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act of 1968'). it also appeared that the value of the goods imported had been misdeclared. the appellants waived the issue of show cause notice and wanted ..... 1986 m/s. trans were not authorised to import the goods in question. certification of registration of allathrin technical (containing a.i. 90% min.) under section 9(4) of the act of 1968 in favour of m/s. trans for import (at page 110 of the paper book) is dated 18-6-1987. the certificate of registration was ..... 24th april, 1980 whereas the so-called contemporary imports are dated june/july, 1981. even accepting that the contract relates to 24th april, 1981 under section 14 of the customs act the value shall be deemed to be the price at which such or like goods are ordinarily sold or offered for sale for delivery at the time .....

Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sudhir Bhatia

Court : Delhi

..... the ground in support of the appeal is that inter alia, the board mis-applied section 15(2) of the copyright act, 1957 in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. the appellants (hereafter called "midas") claim to be pioneers in insecticides and pesticide production in the form of chalks in india. after conceiving the idea and ..... protection are not conferred monopoly rights and are struck of the register. relevant statutory provisions 16. the relevant statutory provisions are extracted below: provisions of the indian copyright act, 1957 section 2 (c) "artistic work" means- (i) a painting, a sculpture, a drawing (including a diagram, map, chart or plan), an engraving or a ..... . this being the position, the same cannot be treated as a design ?. the label cannot be a design also for the reason that in the designs act 1911, section 2(5) defines design as follows: *714 design means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament applied to any article by any industrial process .....

S.M. Trivedi Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1981]130ITR73(MP)

..... this question was raised in that application ; but that application was rejected and in the petition which the petitioner-assessee filed before the high court under section 256(2) of the i.t. act, 1961, this question is specifically raised and, therefore, this court by its order dated 13th august, 1973, directed the; tribunal to make a reference ..... cannot be objected to. 6. on merits the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that although the authorities felt that income earned by m/s. dyestuffs and insecticides was the income of the assessee yet it could not be said that the assessee had the necessary intent of concealment of this income. it was a debatable ..... that the tribunal has made the reference under the direction of this court and, therefore, the matter cannot be considered again. in cit v. smt. anusuya devi : [1968]68itr750(sc) , their lordships of the supreme court considered this question and held (p. 756):'we find it difficult to uphold the view of the calcutta high court .....