Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Page 29 of about 3,410 results (0.145 seconds)

Dec 12 2014 (HC)

New Nandi Seeds Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) X ...

Court : Gujarat

..... rejected lots and losses at processing are returned to farmers only after the foundation seeds are certified as conforming to specifications, the lots are subjected to treatment with insecticides (cell phose, quick phose) and pesticides (thiram and barastin) at the time of packing. the company had filed certificates issued by the seed certification agency and ..... being sown and achieving germination,but in that form they retain the dual utility of being foodgrains as well as seeds. by process of coating and applying insecticides, other chemicals and poisonous substances to the foodgrain meant to be utlised as seeds, one of its basic character, i.e. its consumption as food by ..... and contended that the process is not identical to the case of navbharat seeds (p) ltd., and therefore, assessee is not entitled to deduction under sec. 80ia of the it act. mr. mehta further contended that at least 10 employees are there, and therefore, even if it is a manufacturing process, they are not entitled to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2004 (TRI)

Cynamid Agro Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce (Adj)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)(121)LC434Tri(Mum.)bai

..... preparations: the technical grade manufactured by them have higher concentrations than the formulations, which are made therefrom and which meant for direct application. technical grade are insecticides and pesticides etc. and contain various ingredients in a concentrated and toxic form and have to be further compounded into formulations by the additions of solvents, inerts ..... the central excise act, 1985 and not under chapters 28 or 29 bid.5. this tribunal, by its order no. a/1008, 1009/wzb/ ..... no.29.42 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985 during the period from 23.7.1996 to 31.8.1997. (1) union of india v. pesticides mfg. & formulations association of india it is observed that technical grade pesticides (tg), insecticides, etc. in bulk form are covered under heading 38.08 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1998 (HC)

Rallis India Company and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ4767

..... orders.l. mital, j.1. the petitioners have challenged their prosecution under section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred in short 'the act') by dy. director agriculture (extension) pesticides inspector and registration authority, sirohi through this petition under section 482 cr.p.c. by invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this court.2. petitioner no. 2 is ..... fact about the responsibility of the petitioners nos. 2 to 8, they are not liable to be prosecuted against under section 33 of the act. the petitioners' contention finds full support by the decision of bharat insecticides v. state of rajasthan (supra).5. in view of the foregoing discussion, i am of the view that ..... relied on behalf of the petitioners 1997 (1) wlc (raj) 657 m/s. bharat insecticides ltd. v. state of rajasthan. section 33 of the act clearly envisages that if an offence is committed by a company under the said act, every person who is incharge of or is responsible to the company for the conduct of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr.P.S. Khurana Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .2008 filed by the respondent against the petitioner and others for an offence punishable under section 3(k)(i).17, 18 and 33 punishable under crl. misc. not m-16856 o 2. section 29(1) of insecticides act, 1968 read with rule 27(5) of insecticide rules 1971 (annexure p-1) as also the summoning order dated 11.08.2008 ..... notice to the petitioner and others.learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that for possessing misbranded intoxicants the complaint was filed by state through sandeep kumar , insecticide inspector, abohar against the petitioner and others.according to him, the magistrate did not pass a speaking order on 11.08.2008 while issuing notice to the ..... 11.2008. although examination of the complainant is not a condition precedent in a case brought by a public servant in discharge of his official duties, yet section 200 cr.p.c.does not dispense with the requirement of the magistrate satisfying himself about there being a case for proceeding against the accused. the order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1997 (HC)

Association of Pesticides Manufacturers, Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(5)ALT69; [1998]108STC135(AP)

..... and g.o.ms. no. 784 dated september 19, 1996 were issued by the government exempting second and subsequent sales of drugs, medicines, pesticides and insecticides, etc., from turnover tax payable under section 5-a and that it is only to compensate such exemption, as has been given out in the counter-affidavit of the state itself, that the ..... 1996 was enacted on october 17, 1996 increasing the rate of tax, under section 21, by one per cent, so that the tax on drugs and medicines has been raised to 10 per cent and that on pesticides and insecticides has become 5 per cent. the act having been given retrospective effect from the date of ordinance, steps are being ..... are assailing the provisions of section 21 of a.p. act no. 27 of 1996 [andhra pradesh general sales tax (amendment) act, 1996] in so far as it amends the first schedule of the principal act increasing the rate of tax leviable on drugs nd medicines from 9 per cent to 10 per cent and on pesticides and insecticides, etc., from 4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2008 (HC)

Dipendra Mishra Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2457

..... work, 'abettor' wherein explanations 2 and 3 are relevant. thus, the case has to be brought within the purview of one or the other explanation of section 107 or 108 ipc. the act of suicide is one of the modes of death and out of the four modes of death viz. 'natural, accidental, suicidal and homicidal', the last mode ..... law which existed on the day of the commission of the crime and would not govern the cases which come after incorporation of sections 113a and 113b of the indian evidence act.i have kept the consideration of these sections out of consideration because they were not on statute on the day, the offence was committed in this case. thus, the ..... apprehension of c.explanation 2. whoever, either prior to or at the time the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.7. section 108 of the ipc defines the abater as under:108 abettor - a person abets an offence, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2008 (HC)

Nikson Pharmaceuticals and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2498

..... in : 2000crilj2962 . according to learned counsel for the petitioner the language used in section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1968) is pari-materia rather say verbatim same to section 25 of the act of 1940 and in view of the above judgment this petition filed under section 482 cr.p.c. deserves to be allowed as the said judgment of the ..... request for sending the sample for testing to the central laboratory as could have been done under sub-section (3) and (4) of section 24 of the insecticides act of 1968 and in the case under the drugs and cosmetics act of 1940, sub-section (3) and (4) of section 25. as happened in the case of unique farmaid (p) ltd., (supra) in the present case also, by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1991 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. V. Subramanian

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1992]84STC230(Kar)

..... that the said circular included copper sulphate as a heavy chemical. it was declared that copper sulphate was a subject falling within entry no. 117 as 'insecticides'. the authorities under the act were required to regulate the levy and collection of sales tax on this basis. thereafter the revenue assessed the assessee under entry no. 117. the balance ..... not even agreeing to refund the excess collections to its customers itself is an indication that the assessee collected the tax at a higher rate in contravention of section 18; if actually the assessee has collected the tax at a higher rate by abundant caution, there was nothing in the way of the assessee agreeing to ..... refund the said excess to the customers and therefore, it is a clear case of contravention of section 18. 7. section 18-a read with section 18 are enacted to prevent the dealers from misusing the provisions of the act and collecting amounts by way of tax which are not lawfully leviable. the purpose certainly is to deter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2015 (HC)

Marico Ltd and Ors Vs. State of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... a subsequent decision rendered in northern mineral limited v. union of india air2010sc2829 the supreme court, while dealing with section 24(3) of the insecticides act, 1968, which is in pari materia with s.25(3) of the drugs and cosmetics act, proceeded to discharge the appellant on the premise that no step could be taken for analysis of the sample ..... by central insecticides laboratory due to sheer inaction on the part of the authorities concerned resulting in expiry of ..... fact that the accused had notified its intention to adduce evidence in controversion of the report of insecticide analyst.11. adverting to the facts of the case, it may be observed that the notice under section 13(2) of the act along with the copy of the report of the public analyst was forwarded to the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1995 (HC)

Subhash Chand Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(1996)DMC108

..... stated that she bolted the door from outside keeping the husband and children confined inside the room and outside the room, she in a fit of anger consumed ah insecticide and set fire to herself by pouring kerosene oil on her and lighting the match. the grievance of the wife appears to be that the husband was not earning ..... protect her against his family members. counsel for the state has not pointed out any other plea, which would help him support the impugned order to sustain charge under sections 498a or 306 ipc. the result of the above discussion is that the impugned order relating to the petitioner cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. the charge ..... abetment to commit suicide. it appears that it was a case of trivial domestic quarrels. the main quarrel between the husband and wife is that the husband was not always acting on the lines which wife wanted him to follow. according to the dying declaration, after the deceased had a quarrel with one suman, i.e., the sister-in-law, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //