Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: chennai Page 16 of about 158 results (0.077 seconds)

Indian Overseas Bank Vs. C.R.Chandrasekaran

Court : Chennai

..... of general peace and well-being, there is always give and take. having regard to the nature of the dispute, which was raised as back as 1968, the very fact of the existence of a litigation with regard to the same matter which was bound to take some time must have influenced both the ..... they may not be members of the union which might have entered into settlement during conciliation proceedings. the difference between the settlement arrived at under the act during conciliation proceedings by parties and the settlement arrived at otherwise than during conciliation proceedings has been succinctly brought out by the decision of this court in ..... (scc headnote p.5) ".settlements are divided into two categories, namely, (i) those arrived at outside the conciliation proceedings [section 18(i)]. and (ii) those arrived at in the course of conciliation proceedings [section 18(3)].. a settlement which belongs to the first category has limited application in mind it merely binds the parties to the .....

Lilly Bai Vs. Chinna Thai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)1MLJ131

..... contention also cannot be accepted. even if it is a statutory agreement, the enforcement of the same can be only under the provisions of the specific relief act.45. section 14 of the specific relief act is a bar for the enforcement of personal service, and the remedy can only be for damages. that apart, the form to be executed by the ..... reason also. in either way, it cannot be said that the case of the second defendant is not coming either under section 22 or 23 of the act read with section 53 of the act.29. in this connection, section 53(a) of the act also gains importance. even though that also is in respect of a private school, if it is an inter se ..... other laws, including section 9 of the code of civil procedure and there was no scope for the civil court to entertain any suit.the constitution bench in dhulabhai v. state of m.p. : [1968]3scr662 said:where there is an express bar of the jurisdiction of the court, an examination of the scheme of the particular act to find the adequacy .....

Tahsildar of Mambalam Guindy Taluk Vs. Kaneez Fathima

Court : Chennai

..... made by the first respondent kaneez fathima, dated 12.2.2002. the said representation, which was purported to have been filed in terms of section 12 read with section 15(1) of the tamil nadu act 26/1948, was made seeking for ryotwari patta in respect of the lands set out in the said representation. it is now brought to the ..... and not within her jurisdiction. but at the same time, it was opined that the director of survey and settlement cannot take up the matter under section 5(2) of the inam abolition act for a suomotu enquiry and no stay order can also be passed by the government. it is in this background, the aggrieved authority, i.e., ..... of the supreme court in chidambaram chettiar v. santanaramaswami odayar, reported in (1968) 2 scr 75.= air 196.sc 1005.wherein the provisions of the madras estate lands act 1908 came to be considered. section 3(10) defines the term "private lands". section 3(10)(b)(iv) of the act reads as follows : "(iv)land the entire kudivaram in which was acquired .....

Empee Distilleries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... the reason, the power to make the best of judgment is not conferred on the electrical inspector and electricity tax inspecting officer, in cases falling under section 9 of the act. when statute confers powers on the director of electricity tax to issue a notice under form ei, and also provide an opportunity of being heard, and ..... whether non-compliance of the same, would vitiate the entire land acquisition proceedings, even when the land had already vested in the state, in terms of section 17(1) of the act. due to the divergent views expressed by the hon'ble judges, the matter has been referred to a larger bench. however, the decisions considered by ..... own mind. allam & co. v. europa poster services ltd. [1968 (1) all.er826... ".9. in the case of harishankar bagla v. state of m.p. [air1954sc465, while examining the scope of section 4 of the essential supplies (temporary powers) act, 1946 it was said: section 4 of the act was attacked on the ground that it empowers the central government to .....

C. Stephenson Roobasingh, Manager and Correspondent, Ebenezer Teachers ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1993)2MLJ311

..... was whether a minority educational institution was bound by the provisions of an ordinance made by the syndicate of the university of kerala under section 19(j) of the kerala university act. the court referred to its previous rulings and observed thus:protection of the minorities is an article of faith in the constitution of ..... higher level than those prescribed for other educational institutions. in nageshwaramma v. state of andhra pradesh : air1986sc1188 , the vires of sections 20 and 21 of the andhra pradesh education act of 1982 was challenged and the petitioners sought to get the government orders declining to grant them permission to run teachers training institutes ..... the substance of the right which is guaranteed; they secure the proper functioning of the institutions, in matters educational.in azeez basha v. union of india : [1968]1scr833 , the apex court held that the words 'establish and administer' in article 30(1) should be read conjunctively and that the minority will have the .....

S.P. Dhakshinamoorthy (Died) and ors. Vs. Sri Kamakshiamman Temple Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)2MLJ246

..... show that the plea of mistake cannot be accepted. if so, the defendant cannot deny the title of the temple over the building. the principles of section 116 of the evidence act also apply to the facts of this case.25. learned counsel for the respondent contended that even if the defendant has any right, that right is also ..... termination of the tenancy or the determination of the permission, which was granted to the person in possession, under law as provided in the transfer of property act, clause (h) of section 108 after the determination of the lease, the lessee is given the right while he is in possession of the property, to remove all things which he ..... the lessee to the lessor.22. in gopi kanta sen v. abdul gaffur and ors. (1968)1 s.c.w.r. 168, their lordships were considering about the provisions of calcutta thika tenancy act, and how far section 108 (h) of the transfer of property act is applicable in such tenancies. while considering the same, the right to claim compensation for the .....

M. Veerateswaran Vs. the Deputy Collector Cum Sub-divisional Executive ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(2)CTC449; (2003)2MLJ578

..... such noise pollution arising out of unnecessary use of such electric and air horn deliberately. the transport authorities are under a statutory obligation and duty under section 112 of the motor vehicles act to punish the person who contravenes the provision of rule 114(d) of the rules.'14. noise, it is common knowledge, has adverse effect on ..... on appeal by the appellant to the judicial committee:- it was held, dismissing the appeal, that the control of loudspeakers at public meetings by section 5 of the act of 1969 was not contrary to section 10 of the constitution, for public order required that the public, who did not wish to hear the speaker, be protected from any ..... of affairs that statutory authorities have to be, very often, told what their duties are.36. in regina v. commissioner of police of the metropolis, ex parte blackburn 1968 (2) qb 118 it has been stated as follows:'... mandamus is a very wide remedy which has always been available against public officers to see that they do .....

M/s. Shree Sakthi Modern Rice and Oil Mill, Partnership Firm, Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

..... it is established that the debt or other liability in question is a legally enforceable one, in the considered opinion of this court. in short, the explanation to section 138 of the act clearly mentions that for the purpose of 'debt' or liability' means a 'legally enforceable debt' or other 'liability'. as a logical corollary, only a claim ..... takes a plea that the trial court had failed to take note of a very important fact that all the monetary and procedural requirements envisaged under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act were complied with and in reality, should have convicted the respondent/accused when the case against him was established in accordance with law. 4. the ..... fortify this contention, he relies on the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in gopal krishnaji ketkar v. mohamed haji latif and others, air 1968 supreme court 1413, wherein it is observed that 'a party in possession of best evidence which would throw light on the issue in controversy if he withholds .....