Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: chennai Page 12 of about 158 results (0.089 seconds)

Kottar Chettu Nainar Desika Vinayagar Devaswom Trust rep. by its Trust ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the honourable supreme court has observed at paragraph 9 as follows:- 9. it is axiomatic that condonation of delay is a matter of discretion of the court. section 5 of the limitation act does not say that such discretion can be exercised only if the delay is within a certain limit. length of delay is no matter, acceptability of the explanation ..... described in the plaint schedule are charitable endowments and so they are outside the purview/provisions of the h.r. and c.e act in the absence of any notification issued under section 3 of the said act and for permanent injunction restraining the h.r and c.e., department from claiming account of the plaint madams or claiming any amounts ..... temple, after rejecting the claim of the then administrators that the same is a family temple. (c) the appeal preferred against the said order in a.p.no.24 of 1968 before the commissioner, h.r and c.e., department came to be dismissed on 07.05.1970. challenging the said order of the commissioner, h.r. and c.e., .....

Kamakshi Lamipack Private Limited, Rep.by Its Director Vs. the Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... on 'determination of tariff for generation and distribution' and earlier tariff order no.2, dated 15.05.2006, under first and second provisos to sub-section (2) of section 42 of the electricity act,2003. while the tnerc has fixed the cross subsidy surcharge in the aforesaid tariff order, the state government took a policy decision and directed the tamil ..... : (scc p. 87, para 34) 34. furthermore, i think that the principle laid down by this court in union of india v. indo-afghan agencies ltd. (1968) 2 scr 366 can also be taken into account in judging the reasonableness of the provision in this case. it was held there (at scr p. 385): under our ..... on 'determination of tariff for generation and distribution' and earlier tariff order no.2, dated 15.05.2006, under first and second provisos to sub-section (2) of section 42 of the electricity act,2003 and when the tnerc has fixed the cross subsidy surcharge in the said tariff order, the state government took a policy decision and directed the .....

K. Anbazhagan Vs. M. Kannappan and 10 ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC47

..... the properties of the party. the lawfully elected president and general secretary of the party are thiru m. karunanidhi and thiru k. anbalagan respectively. section 38(3) of the specific relief act provides that 'when the defendant invades or threatens to invade the plaintiff's right to or enjoyment of a property, the court may grant a ..... not be specifically enforced. in the present case, there is no contract between the plaintiff and the defendant which could not be enforced and therefore section 41(e) of the specific relief act cannot be a ground to vacate the interim injunction granted.28. learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff mr. venkatapathi, would refer to the counters ..... groups is that recognised political party and the decision of the commission shall be binding on all such rival sections of groups.'from this we can infer that clause 15 of the symbols order (1968) can be applied only if there is rival group or splinter group and there is a dispute between them and the parent .....

S. R. Bhupeshkar Adn Etc. Etc. Vs. Secretary, Selection Committee, Sab ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1995Mad383

..... world dictionary' and in 'law lexicon (webster)' at pages 626 and 836 respectively. he has also relied upon the judgments in sant ram sharma v. state of rajasthan, : (1968)iillj830sc ; state of karnataka v. m. farida, 'air 1976 sc 2482; punjab engineering college, chandigarh v. sanjay gulati, air 1983 sc 580 and g. sumathi v. ..... 14. undoubtedly, there is considerable force in the submissions made by learned senior counsel for that the above circumstances create a strong suspicion that that the authorities are not acting bona fide. learned senior counsel put it 'picturesquely', 'the door was opened, some (ineligible) people were let in and the door was closed'. in that ..... a larger bench than a division bench. some of the issues particularly one relating to the reservation in excess of 50% the validity of t. n. act 45/94 and the applicability of reservation policy to payment seats, involve substantial questions of law relating to the interpretation of the provisions of the constitution and .....

R. Abdul Jabbar and 5 ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and 4 ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC719; (1997)IMLJ264

..... them to deny compensation amount to the petitioners. it is not disputed mat notification under section 4(l) of the act was issued and the provisions of section 17(4) of the act were invoked: 5-a enquiry was dispensed with and even section 6 declaration was also approved by the state government. he added that even the compensation ..... in support of his submission placed reliance on the following decisions: 1. the special land acquisition and rehabilitation officer, sugar v. m.s. seshagiri rao and anr., : [1968]2scr892 and (2) special land acquisition officer v. k.s. ramachandra rao and ors., : air1972sc2224 .7. the learned government advocate for respondents 1 to 4 argued in ..... be sustained.11. the supreme court in the case of the special land acquisition and rehabilitation officer, sugar v. m.s. seshagiri rao and anr., : [1968]2scr892 was dealing with a case where the lands were granted by the government on condition that the grantee will surrender the lands whenever required by the government .....

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC255

..... :place.......signature........date.........assessing authority....form xiiinotice for auction of the impounded vehicle under tamil nadu entry of motor vehicles into local areas act, 1990, (tamil nadu act 13 of 1990) :(section 15-a)to:thiru/thirumathi ..................... tngst rc. no............. if held ............c.s.................t.c. no..................if held........whereas the amount ..... of five percent specified in section 3(1) itself. in such a situation, it cannot be held that the power conferred upon the state government to specify the rate of tax is unguided. in municipal corporation of delhi v. birala cotton spinning & weaving mills, delhi : [1968]3scr251 , it was held ..... observations which are profitable to understand the dispute raised before us. the supreme court has said after quoting sub-section (1) of section 108 of the government of india act, 1915.this section is an enabling enactment and confers power on the high courts of making rules for the exercise of their .....

Nepc Micon Limited, Vs. Sashi Prakash Khemka and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2007]137CompCas917(Mad); [2007]78SCL442(Mad)

..... intervention once again before the company law board. it is stated by the learned counsel for the respondents that changes effected in sub-section 3 of section 111a of the companies act under the amendment act of 1997 by addition of words 'any other law for the time being in force', is retrospective and hence the petition was maintainable ..... delivered to the company. the company law board was empowered to direct such company to register the transfer of shares.4. under sub-section 3 of section 111a of the act, introduced by the depositories act, 1995, the company law board was empowered to direct rectification of register of members or records of a depository in the case ..... the amendment, both the common law and statutory remedy are concurrent remedies available leaving open an element of election to the parties concerned. the decision of the supreme court in (1968) 22 stc 416 (dhulabai v. state of m.p.) ( : [1988]171itr254(sc) (raja ram kumar bhargava v. union of india) is an authority for .....

Munikrishna Reddy Vs. S.K. Ramaswami and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1969Mad389

..... , in the interests of justice, i have decided to convert the appeal into a revision petition. it has been numbered as c. r. p. no. 612 of 1968.7. the question for consideration under section 115(b) c. p. c. will be whether the appeal to the learned subordinate judge was competent, and, by dismissing it as not maintainable, the learned judge ..... in the case of an ex parte order the notice was not duly served, the date when the applicant had knowledge of the order. (4) the provisions of section 5 of indian limitation act 1908, shall apply to applications under sub-rule (1). these rules were added in madras by p. dis. no. 397 of 1945 as a result of the decision ..... that case, on the judgment-debtor's application under order 21, rule 90, the executing court ordered the applicant to deposit the sale amount in cash. the learned district munsif acted under the proviso which had been introduced to order 21 rule 90 on 20-10-1936 in high court p. dis. no. 691 of 1936. the applicant tendered a draft .....

K.A. Bari Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1970]26STC290(Mad)

..... tax appellate tribunal regulations, 1959. regulation 2(ii) of the said regulations defines 'appeal' to mean a memorandum of appeal to the appellate tribunal under section 36 of the act. regulation 9(1) enables the tribunal to dismiss the appeal for default of appearance of the appellant and regulation 9(2) empowers the tribunal to readmit ..... cases that regulation 9(1) enabling the tribunal to dismiss an appeal for default of appearance of the appellant is repugnant to the provisions of section 36(3) of the act, that the tribunal cannot frame such a regulation in the guise of regulating its procedure and business, that the power to frame regulations is conditioned ..... co. (p.) ltd. : [1967]65itr381(sc) , the supreme court, while considering the words 'pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit' in section 33(4) of the income-tax act, 1922, had expressed that the said expression is intended to define the jurisdiction of the tribunal to deal with and determine questions which arise out of the .....

Eternit Everest Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1996(56)ECC24; 1997LC52(Madras); 1997(89)ELT28(Mad)

..... and ancillary power of the legislature. in view of the above discussion and applying principle no.(2) aforementioned, sub-section (1) of section 11d of the central excise act and sub-section (1) of section 28b of the customs act cannot but be held to be beyond the legislative competence. therefore, the answer to the aforesaid first question will ..... any central excise officer duly empowered by the central government is enabled to summon persons to give evidence and produce documents in inquiries under the act. section 11 of the act provides for recovery of any duty and any other sums of any kind payable to the central government by availing of the procedure deeming the ..... of the act is ultra vires and unconstitutional, so far as the other writ petitions are concerned, they relate to similar show-cause notices issued relating to different periods demanding different sums of amount as set out hereunder - sl. no. w.p. no. show-cause notice and date amount demanded period covered 1. [1968/93] o .....