Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 16 central insecticides laboratory Court: supreme court of india Page 5 of about 197 results (0.087 seconds)

Tarsem Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC1454; 2008(16)SCALE168; 2009AIRSCW928; 2009(1)LHSC19

..... to prove that endocel was got recovered by parmjit kaur, appellant, by making a disclosure statement. according to the chemical report, ex. pn, endocel is an insecticide of the chloroco compound group. thus, this poison has not been consumed by smt. amriko and as such, it cannot be said that parmjit kaur or other ..... underlying bone was not fractured.8. it is not in dispute that death of amriko took place due to consumption of organo phosphorus compound. endocel, which is an insecticide of the chloroco compound group, was recovered. it is now not in dispute that amriko died of consuming phosphorus compound. 9. before embarking on further discussions on ..... so as to bring it within the purview of 'death occurring otherwise than in normal circumstances'. the expression 'soon before' is very relevant where section 113b of the evidence act and section 304b ipc are pressed into service. the prosecution is obliged to show that soon before the occurrence there was cruelty or harassment and only in .....

Cadila Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Vadodara

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1700; 2003(86)ECC25; 2003(152)ELT262(SC); (2003)2GLR1706; JT2004(3)SC255; 2003(2)SCALE63; (2003)4SCC12; [2003]1SCR1048

..... two appeals is whether excise duty is payable on these intermediate products and whether the respondents were entitled to the extended period under section 11a of the central excise and salt act, 1944. the questions being common in both the appeals they are being disposed off by this common judgement. in both the ..... case of collector of central excise, baroda v. united phosphorus ltd. : 2000ecr6(sc) certain intermediate products came into existence in the process of manufacture of insecticides, fungicides, weedicides and pesticides. the question was whether those intermediate products were excisable. it was held that even though an intermediate product may be one which ..... 1991, the collector had accepted the appellants case and dropped the show cause proceedings. however, thereafter the central board of excise and customs exercised powers under section 35e and had the matter referred to the tribunal. we have also seen the order dated 19th august, 1993 passed by the collector in civil appeal .....

M/s Bilag Industries P.ltd. Vs. Commr.of Cen.exc.daman

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... who were its major shareholders/promoters. mil used to manufacture pesticides, insecticides and their intermediaries classifiable under chapter 38, central tariff act, 1985 (hereafter 1 dated 23.04.2010 in order no.330-337/wzd/ahb/20210 2 ceta ). these fell under the broad category ..... industries ltd., vapi (hereafter bil ) sold its products to the buyer, should be treated as a transaction with a related person under section 4(4)(c) of the central excise act, 1944 (hereafter the act ).2. bil was incorporated as mitsu industries ltd. (hereafter mil ) in 1992; it was formed by members of the bilkhias family ..... in examining whether the parties were related might be 7 (2003) 1 scc14212 justified; however, it could not have concluded that such relationship, as is contemplated by section 4(4)(c) could have been inferred, without applying the proper test. additionally, the revenue had the materials before it, in the form of documents which .....

Jamuna Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC553; 1967(0)BLJR289; 1967CriLJ541; [1967]1SCR469

raghubar dayal, j.1. jamuna singh, appeals, by special leave, against the order of the patna high court dismissing his appeal and confirming his conviction and sentence under sections 323 and 436 read with s. 109, i.p.c. 2. along with the appellant, four other persons were prosecuted for committing riot and the offence under s. ..... the abetment, and no express provision is made by this code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence. explanation - an act or offence is said to be committed in consequence of abetment, when it is committed in consequence of the instigation, or in pursuance of the conspiracy or with the aid ..... of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if any act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, and which causes hurt to any person, is done, the abettor shall be liable to imprisonment of either .....

Amalendu Pal @ Jhantu Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2010SC512; 2009(57)BLJR2872; JT2009(14)SC195; 2009(13)SCALE663; (2010)1SCC707; 2009(10)LC4917(SC); 2009AIRSCW7070

..... about by persuasion to do any thing. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, as provided in the three clauses of section 107. section 109 provides that if the act abetted is committed in consequence of abetment and there is no provision for the punishment of such abetment, then the offender is to be punished ..... instigates any person to do that thing as stated in clause firstly or to do anything as stated in clauses secondly or thirdly of section 107 ipc. section 109 ipc provides that if the act abetted is committed pursuant to and in consequence of abetment then the offender is to be punished with the punishment provided for the ..... .--whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.13. the legal position as regards sections 306 ipc which is long settled was recently reiterated by this court in the .....

State of Kerala and Ors Vs. S.Unnikrishnan Nair and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... about by persuasion to do any thing. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid, as provided in the three clauses of section 107. section 109 provides that if the act abetted is committed in consequence of abetment and there is no provision for the punishment of such abetment, then the offender is to be punished ..... any person to do that thing as stated in clause firstly or to do anything as stated in clauses secondly or thirdly of section 107 ipc. section 109 ipc provides that if the act abetted is committed pursuant to and in consequence of abetment then the offender is to be punished with the punishment provided for the ..... the immediate calamity or self-perceived consequence. we may hasten to add that our submission has nothing to do when a case under section 306 ipc is registered in aid of section 113a of the evidence act, 1872.20. in the result, we do not perceive any merit in the appeal and the same stands dismissed accordingly. ..........................j .....

The Municipal Corporation for the City of Thane and Others Vs. Asmaco ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2440; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)343; JT1998(5)SC11a; 1998(4)SCALE196; (1999)1SCC372; [1998]3SCR774

..... goods are classified under class ii as articles used for food and drink for men and animals and drugs and under serial no. 14 all chemicals, chemical insecticides, surgical goods of all kinds are included. class iii refers to articles used for fuel lighting, washing and industrial use and under item 40(b) chemicals ..... chemical under entry 40(b) schedule of relevant rules. hence these appeals.5. the octroi schedule framed in accordance with the maharashtra municipality (octroi duty) rules, 1968, class ii refers to articles set out in the schedule giving the serial number, description of the goods and their rate at which the octroi is levied. ..... form would fall under 'plastic and plastic goods, plastic powder' in item 53(c) of schedule i to maharashtra municipality (octroi duty) rules, 1968 framed under the bombay provincial municipal corporation act, 1949 or under item 32(c) of schedule h to the municipal corporation (levy of) octroi rules, 1965 framed under the bombay municipal corporation .....

Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(SC)68; [2001]251ITR323(SC)

..... opinion that the processing of the raw berries into coffee beans ready for consumption would not be a manufacturing activity disentitling the assessee to the investment allowance provided under section 32a of the act.17. accordingly, the appeals are allowed with costs. the impugned order/judgment of the high court is set aside and that of the tribunal is restored. the question ..... limited company. it is engaged in the export of coir products, distribution of insecticides and pesticides, running and managing of estates on service contracts. in addition, the assessee has coffee curing plants. for the machinery installed for curing of the coffee, the assessee claimed investment allowance under section 32a for both the assessment years. the income tax officer held that the assessee .....

Susela Padmavathy Amma Vs. M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... taken by this court in the case of k.k. ahuja vs. v.k. vora and another8.14. in the case of state of nct of delhi through prosecuting officer, insecticides, government of nct, delhi vs. rajiv khurana9, this court reiterated the position thus: 17. the ratio of all these cases is that the complainant is required to state in ..... not in charge of and was not responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the relevant time, will not be liable for an offence under section 141 of the ni act. in national small industries corpn. [national small industries corpn. ltd. v. harmeet singh paintal, (2010) 3 scc330: (2010) 1 scc (civ) 677 : (2010) 2 scc (cri) 1113 ..... in other words, the law laid down by this court is that for making a director of a company liable for the offences committed by the company under section 141 of the ni act, there must be specific averments against the director showing as to how and in what manner the director was responsible for the conduct of the business of the .....

Pawan Kumar Vs. State of H.P

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... has written the same version in ext. pw- 10/a, which was told by sahlu. statement ext. pw-10/a would constitute a dying declaration under section 32 of the evidence act. merely that the doctor has not issued certificate that shalu was fit to make statement would not in any way affect the dying declaration made by deceased on ..... omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or thirdly, intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. explanation to section 107 states that any wilful misrepresentation or wilful concealment of material fact which he is bound to disclose, may also come within the contours ..... , thus, means certain amount of active suggestion or support to do the act.33. analysing the concept of abetment as found in section 107 ipc, a two-judge bench in chitresh kumar chopra v. state (government of nct of delhi)[18]. has held:- 13. as per the section, a person can be said to have abetted in doing a thing, .....