Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 16 central insecticides laboratory Court: supreme court of india Page 9 of about 197 results (0.535 seconds)

Ramaswami Ayyangar and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC2027; 1976CriLJ1563; (1976)3SCC779; [1976]3SCR876

..... presence of those who. in one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common, design, is itself tantamount to actual participation in the 'criminal act.' the essence of section 34 is simultaneous consensus of the minds of persons participating in the criminal action to bring about a particular result. such consensus can be developed at the spot ..... of assaulting p.w. 1 and making him fall down unconscious.11. it is contended that a-2 cannot be held vicariously liable with the aid of section 34 for the act of a-3 and a-4, for two reasons: firstly, he did not physically participate in the fatal beating administered by a-3 and a-4 ..... read along with the preceding section 33 which makes it clear that the 'act' spoken of in. section 34 includes a series of acts as a single act. it follows that the words 'when a criminal act is done by several persons' in section 34, may be construed to mean 'when criminal acts are done by several persons.' the acts committed by different confederates in .....

S.S. ChheenA. Vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan and Another.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... case of a mobile phone. he further mentioned in the suicide note that harminder singh and his accomplices were responsible for this act. on the basis of the suicide note a fir no.81 dated 17.10.2003 under section 306 of the ipc was registered at the police station, grps, amritsar. in the said fir, the suicide note of the ..... by this court is clear that in order to convict a person under section 306 ipc there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. it also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and that act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position ..... explanation 2 which has been inserted along with section 107 reads as under:"explanation 2.--whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act."22. the learned counsel for the appellant has .....

Praveen Pradhan. Vs. State of Uttranchal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... driver after all this, committed suicide. this court found that such incident was a one time occurrence. for the purpose of bringing home any charge, vis--vis section 306/107 ipc against the accused, this court stated that there must be allegations to the effect that the accused had either instigated the deceased in some way, ..... place between the accused and the deceased during which, the accused asked the deceased to go and die. a chargesheet was filed against the accused under section 306 r/w section 107 ipc when the said person actually committed suicide. this court dealt with the issue elaborately, taking into consideration the fact that the accused had also ..... of abetment by instigation depends upon the intention of the person who abets and not upon the act which is done by the person who has abetted. the abetment may be by instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid as provided under section 107 ipc. however, the words uttered in a fit of anger or omission without any intention .....

Kamalakar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the deceased and the appellant and her subsequent death by burning herself. the appellant has not committed any positive or direct act to instigate or aid in the commission of suicide by the deceased. 8.7. hence as the ingredients of section 306 ipc have not been fulfilled in the case at hand, the conviction of the appellant under ..... this court are clear that in order to convict a person under section 306 ipc there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. it also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position ..... doing of that thing. explanation 2. whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitates the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act.8.2. section 306 ipc penalizes abetment of commission of suicide. to charge someone under this .....

Raja Kulkarni and ors. Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1954)56BOMLR459; (1954)ILLJ1SC; (1954)IMLJ83(SC); [1954]1SCR384

..... been reiterated before us. 4. in order to deal with the first contention, it will be necessary to refer to certain provisions of the appellate tribunal act. section 7 of that act provides an appeal to the appellate tribunal from any award or decision of an industrial tribunal : (a) if the appeal involves any substantial question of law ..... to go on strike. the labour commissioner thereupon filed complaints before the presidency magistrate on august 28, charging the appellants with an offence under section 27 of the appellate tribunal act. the mill mazdoor sabha applied to be made a party to the appeal, but the application was rejected. as already stated, the appellants ..... and do not belong to any union. 2. on december 9, 1949, the representative union gave a notice of change under section 42 of the bombay industrial relations act, 1946, hereinafter called the act, to the mill owners association in bombay claiming bonus for that year. on december 23, the dispute was referred by the government .....

The Workmen of the Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. the Management of the ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC1280; (1969)IILLJ673SC; (1969)2SCC13; [1970]1SCR304

..... misconduct. the point is whether participation in and incitement to join the said strike were in respect of a strike which was in contravention of any act or law. section 23 provides that no workman employed in an industrial establishment shall go on strike in breach of contract and during the period in which a settlement is ..... and the orders of dismissal were consequently not sustainable; (2) that the said strike, which was spontaneously staged by the workmen, was not illegal under section 24 of the industrial disputes act, nor was it in contravention of any law as required by standing order 22(2) and (3); (3) that the said disciplinary proceedings were in ..... 12, 1966, the management, agreeing with the report, passed orders of dismissal against the said three workmen which gave rise to the said reference. on march 23, 1968 the labour court gave its award holding that the said enquiry was validly held and that the management were justified in passing the said orders of dismissal.3. mr. .....

P. Nallammal Etc. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC2556; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)420; 1999CriLJ3967; 1999LC22(SC); JT1999(5)SC410; RLW1999(2)SC336; 1999(4)SCALE501; (1999)6SCC559; [1999]Supp1SCR135; 2000(1)SLJ320(SC)

..... under the aforesaid clause. 19. the above contention perhaps could have been advanced before the enactment of the p.c. act 1988 because section 5(1 )(e) of the old p.c. act did not contain an 'explanation' as section 13(1)(e) now contains. as per the explanation the 'known sources of income' of the public servant, for ..... to three years, or with fine, or with both. 17. therefore, the legislative intent is manifest that abettors of all the different offences under section 13(1)(e) of the p.c. act should also be dealt with along with the public servant in the same trial held by the special judge.18. shri k.k. venugopal endeavoured ..... 1989)iillj506sc .6. shri shanti bhushan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent -state submitted that it would be a dangerous proposition that the offence under section 13(1)(e) of the p.c. act is unbeatable because a non public servant who actively aids and facilitates the perpetration of the said offence would move at large with immunity. learned counsel .....

Netaji Achyut Shinde(patil) Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common design, is itself tantamount to actual 8(1976) 3 scc77916 participation in the 'criminal act'. the essence of section 34 is simultaneous consensus of the minds of persons participating in the criminal action to bring about a particular result. such consensus can be developed at ..... confidence, and should not be relied upon.14. it was further argued that the recovery of the accused s clothes sought to be proved under section 27 of the evidence act, was contrary to law and probability. it was submitted that the distance between the police station to kothala is 15 to 20 k.m. the ..... names as netaji, samadhan and balasaheb]..2. a first information report (fir802011) was registered at kallam police station, alleging the commission of offences punishable under section 302 read with section 34 ipc, i.e., the murderous attack on one suhas, the deceased. the statements of eyewitnesses as well as the dying declaration by the deceased suhas .....

Satbir Singh Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the accused to prepare his defense since the inception of the trial with due caution, keeping in consideration the peculiarities of section 304 b, ipc read with section 113 b, evidence act. viii. section 232, crpc provides that, if, after taking the evidence for the prosecution, examining the accused and hearing the prosecution and ..... of the accused to prepare his defense, since the inception of the trial, with due caution, keeping in consideration the peculiarities of section 304 b, ipc read with section 113 b, evidence act.21. section 232, crpc assumes importance, which reads as, if, after taking the evidence for the prosecution, examining the 15 accused and hearing ..... body.35. in light of the fact that there was insufficient evidence to prove the factum of suicide beyond reasonable doubt, the presumption under section 113 a, evidence act, is not of much help for the prosecution. the essential ingredient of deceased committing suicide has not been proved by the prosecution by adducing .....

Gumansinh @ Lalo @ Raju Bhikhabhai Chauhan Vs. The State Of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... unless and until it is disproved or may call for proof of it.32. from the above observations, it becomes clear that to attract the applicability of section 113-a of the evidence act, three conditions are required to be fulfilled :- i. the woman has committed suicide, ii. such suicide has been committed within a period of seven years ..... counsel for the parties.13. it is undisputed that the suicidal death of the deceased occurred within a short span of eight months of marriage. section 113-a of the evidence act, provides for presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman within 5 seven years of marriage, by her husband or any of his relative ..... committed suicide by consuming pesticide within seven years of marriage, whether the accused can also be held guilty for the offence punishable under section 306 ipc with the aid of section 113 a of the evidence act.28. in the case at hands, the prosecution failed to adduce any direct evidence to establish that the accused abetted deceased into .....