Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 16 central insecticides laboratory Court: supreme court of india Page 3 of about 197 results (0.270 seconds)

M/S. Northern Minerals Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Rajasthan Govt. and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... counsel for the appellants invited our pointed attention to sections 22 and 24 of the insecticide act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as `the act'). the same are extracted hereunder for facility of reference: 22 procedure to be followed by insecticide inspectors (1) where an insecticide inspector seizes any record, register or document under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 21, he shall, as soon as may be ..... .1994.4. the joint director agriculture (plant protection) rajasthan, jaipur, accorded his written consent authorising the insecticide inspector to institute a case for prosecution under section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act against the appellants on 31.05.1995. in compliance with the aforesaid sanction, the insecticide inspector-cum-assistant director of agriculture (hq) ajmer, filed a complaint on 13.09.1995 before the .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sanjay Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1919; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)931; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)115; 1998(46)BLJR1142; 1998CriLJ2531; 1998(2)Crimes321(SC); JT1998(3)SC647; RLW1998(2)SC320; 1998(3)SCALE380; (1998)5SCC82

..... of the andhra pradesh high court held that for prosecution of offences of misbranding under insecticides act, the period of limitation would start from the date on which the report of the analyst was received but not from the date of taking samples and thus section 469(1)(b) would be attracted.12. we are in entire agreement with the ..... arora v. the state (1987) crl. law journal 1215, the question which fell for consideration of delhi high court was whether for prosecution under sections 7, 19 and 16(1) of the seeds act, 1966, the period of limitation of six months would start from the date of collection of samples under clause (a) or from the date of ..... 3, 1990 and accordingly the drugs inspector (ib), directorate, medical and health services, rajasthan, jaipur, filed complaint under section 18(a) read with sections 16, 17 and 17a punishable under sections 27(d) and 27(b)(i) of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, on june 28,1991. on the same day, the learned additional civil judge & c.j.m., .....

Gurcharan Singh Vs. The State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... suicide, by consuming pesticide.10. the submissions of the learned counsel have been considered. in order to give the finding of abetment under section 107 ipc, the accused should instigate a person either by act of omission or commission and only then, a case of abetment is made out. in the present case however, there is no direct ..... and affection and financial security at the hands of her husband and if her hopes are frustrated by the act or by wilful negligence of the husband, it would constitute abetment within the meaning of section 107 ipc, warranting conviction under section 306 ipc. with such reasoning, the trial court concluded that shinder kaur committed suicide when her hopes ..... this court is clear that in order to convict a person under section 306 ipc there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence. it also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and that act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a .....

Kisan Beej Bhandar, Abohar Vs. Chief Agricultural Officers, Ferozepur ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1990Supp(1)SCC111

..... petition by the high court where he had disputed the cancellation of his licence granted under the insecticides act, 1968.3. the short facts which are no more in dispute are these : the appellant had a dealer's licence under the act to deal in insecticides. the chief agricultural officer, ferozepur, cancelled this licence by order dated july 15, 1982, on ..... of the appellant. unless he had any other source of information about misbranding and it has not been established the appellant is entitled to the protection of sub-section (3). in the facts once the appellant's contention that it was a sealed tin intact has been found, the burden that lay on him under the ..... provisions of sub-section (3) had been satisfactorily discharged, even in the matter of considering the question of cancellation of licence and, therefore, his licence should not have been cancelled. we .....

Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner (Aa) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(236)ELT425(SC); JT2009(7)SC1; 2009(4)SCALE666; 2009(3)LC1550(SC); (2009)25VST271(SC); 2009AIRSCW6376:2009(4)Scale666.

..... the writ petition;iii) to declare that the sales turnover of products falling within the description insecticides and pesticides which are manufactured under licence under the insecticides act and falling within the description of entry 44(5) of iii schedule of kvat act is liable to be taxed only at 4% and levy of tax at 12.5% is ..... a specified period, at the rate of four per cent at all points of such transfer.5. the revenue, however, contends that section 6(1)(d) shall apply. clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 6 reads thus:(d) in the case of goods not falling under clauses (a) or (c) at the rate of 12. ..... , electric or 8516.79.20electronic mosquito repellents,gadgets and insect repellents,devices and parts and accessoriesthereof._______________________________________________________4. according to the appellant, in this case section 6(1)(a) of the act would be applicable, the relevant portion whereof reads as under:6. levy of tax on sale or purchase of goods.-(1) every dealer whose .....

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... - biological counts in excess of such tolerance limit as may be specified by the regulations. it also provides that no insecticide shall be used directly on articles of food except fumigants registered and approved under the insecticide act, 1968.13. section 24 of the fss act deals with restrictions of advertisement and prohibition as to unfair trade practices and reads as follows: 24. restrictions of advertisement ..... active substances and micro- biological counts in excess of such tolerance limits as may be specified by regulations. (2)no insecticide shall be used directly on article of food except fumigants registered and approved under the insecticides act, 1968. explanation.- for the purposes of this section,- (1)".pesticide residue". means any specified substance in food resulting from the use of a pesticide and includes any .....

Narendra Kumar Maheshwari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC2138; (1989)2CompLJ95(SC); JT1989(2)SC338; 1989(1)SCALE1353; 1990Supp(1)SCC440; [1989]3SCR43

..... act, 1934 (and rules and orders made thereunder) ; explosives act (and rules made thereunder) ; essential commodities act, atomic energy act ; insecticide act ; air (prevention and control of) pollution act, 1981 ; indian standards institution certification (marks) act, 1952 (and rules and regulations thereunder) ; foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 ; interest act, 1978 ; securities regulation act and dowry prohibition act, ..... india ltd. as regards convertible debenture issue, it was asserted that there is no violation of the provisions of section 81(5) of the companies act, 1956 as the section contemplates only an optional conversion of government loan into equities, in the instant case, there is a compulsory conversion ..... interest aspect of the issue of shares and debentures. in the past decades, investors in shares and equities constituted a very limited section of the public and consisted of two extreme types-either persons who could shrewdly appraise the merits of each issue and take .....

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... we may notice that the seeds act, 1966 (section 14(1)(e), the insecticides act, 1968 (section 21(f)), the kerala fish seed act, 2014 (section 19(1)(e), uttarakhand 143 ground water (regulation and control of development and management) act, 2016 [section 13(1)(j)]., contain provisions similar to what is contained in section 22(1)(d) of the act.113. the weekly holidays act, 1942 [section 8(1)(c)]., the jammu and ..... kashmir factories act, 1999 [section 9(1)(c)]., contained provisions .....

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Dharam Pal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1998)8SCC497

..... by the authorised distributor/manufacturer and had not been tampered with and as such, the provisions of sections 30(3) of the insecticides act, 1968 were attracted. it is thus obvious that before the provisions of section 30(3) are attracted, the conditions laid down in the said section have to be satisfied. the learned single judge did not go into the facts of each case ..... -85, 21586-87 and 21990 of 19951. special leave granted.2. the respondents, in the bunch appeals herein, were carrying on the business of sale of insecticides. the agricultural inspector took the samples of insecticides which were found to be misbranded. as a consequence, the licence of the respondents was cancelled. they challenged the order of cancellation by way of writ petitions .....

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

..... schedule does not include seeds specifically in the serialized item such seeds are not specified agricultural produce and (b) on the process of coating and applying insecticides, other chemicals and poisonous substances the basic character i.e. its consumption as food by human being or animals is irretrievably lost and that such commodity ..... rejected lots and losses at processing are returned to farmers only after the foundation seeds are certified as conforming to specifications, the lots are subjected to treatment with insecticides (cell phose, quick phose) and pesticides (thiram and barastin) at the time of packing. 9. it is the case of the first respondent that the ..... senior counsel appearing for the parties also drew our attention to the relevant provisions of the seeds act, 1966 (act no. 54 of 1966) and the seeds rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules'). we have also perused the schedule (sections 2(a) and 4-a) to the adhiniyam in which under the heading a-agriculture, .....