Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 10 appeal against non registration or cancellation Page 20 of about 2,478 results (0.228 seconds)

Jaishree Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1865

..... case no. 294/95 titled state v. sohan lal and ors. whereby the learned magistrate has taken cognizance of offences punishable under sections 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) read with section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (for short 'the act').2. briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner no. 1 is a manufacturer and supplier of ..... insecticides while petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are its directors functioning at delhi. shri ramdas garg, who is proprietor of m/s. aggarwal pesticides .....

Babulal Agarwal and anr. Etc. Vs. Associate Director and ors. Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3794; 1999WLC(Raj)UC494

..... days, deliver to the insecticide inspector submitting it a signed report in duplicate in the ..... after the date of the expiry of the insecticides, submitted that on the technicalities the trial of the petitioners should not be quashed.4. section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968 reads as follows :-24. report of insecticide analyst.- (1) the insecticide analyst to whom a sample of any insecticide has been submitted for test or analysis under sub-section (6) of section 22, shall, within a period of sixty .....

Present: Mr.Arun Chandra Advocate Vs. Stae of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... packing. in appeal vide annexure p-3 licence of the petitioner was restored in view of section 30 (3) of the act. accordingly, the petition is allowed. criminal complaint (annexure p-2) under section 3 (k) (i) 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 read with rule 27 (5) of the rules, 1971 and all the consequent proceedings arising therefrom ..... in his possession, was properly stored and remained in the same state as when he acquired it. . a perusal of section 30(3) of the insecticides act, 1968 shows that the petitioner is entitled to the protection under the same, in case, the sample is taken from the sealed container and the seal had not ..... . mr.deep singh, aag, punjab. *** sabina, j. petitioner has filed this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 for quashing of criminal complaint (annexure p-2) under section 3 (k) (i) 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 (the act for short) read with rule 27 (5) of the rules, 1971 and all the consequent .....

Present:- Mr.Ravish Bansal Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... insecticides rules, 1971 (for short the rules .)(annexure p-10).summoning order dated 19.12.1997 (annexure p-13) and proceedings ..... respondent-state *** rekha mittal,j. the instant petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure (for short the code .) has been preferred by the petitioners seeking quashing of criminal complaint no.193-2 dated 19.12.1997 for offence under sections 3(k)(1).17, 18, 29, 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 (for short the act .) read with rule 10, 27(5) of .....

M/s Reckitt Benckiser (india) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Commercial Taxes

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the kerala vat act which covers "mosquito repellants . 9.1 even otherwise it is required to be noted that entry 44( ..... at 12.5%. the insecticides under entry 44(5) therefore can be said to be a general entry. once there is a specific entry the mosquito repellant , thereafter one is not required to go to the definition under another act namely insecticides act. sl.no.66 of notification sro8206 dated 21.01.2006 issued under section 6(1)(d) ..... 5) which includes insecticides relates to products which are used in agricultural operations. all the products in the entry .....

M/S. Northern Minerals Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Rajasthan Govt. and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... counsel for the appellants invited our pointed attention to sections 22 and 24 of the insecticide act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as `the act'). the same are extracted hereunder for facility of reference: 22 procedure to be followed by insecticide inspectors (1) where an insecticide inspector seizes any record, register or document under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 21, he shall, as soon as may be ..... .1994.4. the joint director agriculture (plant protection) rajasthan, jaipur, accorded his written consent authorising the insecticide inspector to institute a case for prosecution under section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act against the appellants on 31.05.1995. in compliance with the aforesaid sanction, the insecticide inspector-cum-assistant director of agriculture (hq) ajmer, filed a complaint on 13.09.1995 before the .....

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Jawahar Lal Malhotra

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)867

..... of the appeal made a submission that he was also carrying on the business of stocking and sale of insecticides/pesticides and weedicide and for that he had been granted a licence under the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968. it was also submitted that the learned registering authority had erred in law to consider the godown of the ..... officer, who passed the order, annexure p-4.10. the second contention of learned counsel, noted above, has no merit in view of mandate contained in section 6-b of the act of 1955, which reads as follows:-'6-b:-issue of show cause notice before confiscation of essential commodity:- (1) no order confiscating any (essential commodity, ..... jurisdiction. the order passed by ado(civil) was also totally without jurisdiction. it was passed by an authority not empowered to pass it. the mandatory provisions of section 6-a were completely violated. it is well settled that if the legislature has vested the power in a particular authority, it has to be exercised by that .....

M/S Chandan Pesticides and Another Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... position explained above, the present petition is allowed. the complaint no.235 dated 23.1.2013 under sections 29 read with section 3(k)(i).17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 and rules 10 and 27 (5) of the insecticides rules 1971 as well as summoning order dated 23.1.2013 and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the ..... punjab. daya chaudhary, j. the present petition has been filed under section 482 crpc for quashing of complaint no.235 dated 23.1.2013 under sections 29 read with section 3(k)(i).17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 and rules 10 and 27 (5) of the insecticides rules 1971 as well as summoning order dated 23.1.2013. briefly ..... the facts of the case are that on 30.5.2009 insecticide inspector, shri harminder pal singh, inspected .....

Bahadur Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1998CriLJ3546

..... /s hindustan pulverising mills, the manufacturer and (5) m.n. murli kumar, chief chemist of the manufacturer under sections 3k(1), 17, 18 & 33 of insecticide act,1968 for selling, stocking, distributing and manufacturing the substandard pesticide. on 1121994, the learned chief judicial magistrate, jalandhar, ordered ..... the accused to be summoned.3. that is why bahadur singh the proprietor of m/s. dhanju pesticide store and dhanju pesticides have filed cr. misc.,5583m 1997 while m/s. delhi agriculture store has filed cr. misc.6051m1997 under section ..... the petitioners they have lost the valuable right of having the insecticide reanalysed as guaranteed under section 24 of the insecticide act.8. thirdly, as pointed out already, the manufacturer of the insecticide has not been arraigne das an accused and on that ground certain .....

Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1158

..... the code of criminal procedure, 1973, seeks quashing, of a criminal complaint filed by the insecticides inspector. samrala (annexure p-5) on the ground that the right of the petitioner under section 24(4) of the insecticides act, 1968 (for brevity the act) to get the sample analysed from the central insecticides laboratory has been snatched and his defence is completely prejudiced.2. facts in brief are ..... that on july 25, 1995 the insecticides inspector took sample of cypermethrin 25% ec, which was found to be .....