Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 10 appeal against non registration or cancellation Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 54 results (0.130 seconds)

Swastik Pesticides and Chemicals thro' Vijaykumar Vs. the State of Guj ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2027

..... cited decision (re.paras:3, 4 and 5) :'3. despite the request having been made by the petitioner as envisaged under section 24(3) of the insecticides act, 1968 (herinafter referred to as 'the act'). admittedly, no sample was sent to the central insecticide laboratory but the complaint was filed on 18.4.1996. admittedly, the shelf life of the product was to expire in september ..... judicial magistrate, surendranagar, has prayed for quashing of criminal complaint as well as prosecution instituted thereon in reference to the provisions of section 3(k)(1), 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the insecticide act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. the petitioner-orig.accused no. 2 (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused-company') is a registered company under the companies .....

Nestle India Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1998)1GLR528

..... as under:hindustan ciba-geigy ltd. v. state of rajasthan 1994 cr. lr 785 (raj.). in that case complaint was filed under the insecticides act after expiry of the shelf life of the insecticide. in that case, after receipt of report of public analyst, the accused was deprived of his legitimate valuable right of re-analysis by second ..... public analyst, valuable right is conferred upon the accused to send through court another sample to the central food laboratory for analysis as provided under section 13(2-b) of the act. sub-section (2-d) provides that until the receipt of the certificate of the result of the analysis from the director of the central food laboratory, ..... sample in the central food laboratory under section 24(4) of the act as there was no sense in sending the sample for analysis after expiry date. .....

State of Gujarat Vs. R.N. Vora and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1987)2GLR725

..... limited., bombay and the accused no. 3, regional manager, s.m.p. pvt. ltd., ahmedabad, from the charge under sections 3(k), 17(1)(a) and 18(1)(c) of the insecticides act, 1968. having been aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said acquittal judgment, the present appeal is preferred by the state of gujarat.2. ..... the complainant holds the requisite qualifications for his post which are required under the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').4. under the act, the complainant is empowered to inspect the premises and to take samples of the insecticide materials in order to verify whether they are manufactured as per the requirements under ..... on the activities ascribed to an inspector.10. in this connection, it is necessary to refer to section 20 of the act, which relates to insecticide inspectors. the relevant part of section 20 of the act runs as under:20. insecticide inspectors - (1) the central government or a state government, may, by notification in the official .....

Vahanvati Agro Centre and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)3GLR1965

..... a complaint filed by respondent no. 2 herein before the learned judicial magistrate, first class at sidhpur in mehsana district for offence punishable unde sections 3, 17 and 18 read with section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 (for short, 'the act'). the said complaint has been registered before the said court as criminal case no. 728 of 1998.3. it was alleged in the said ..... second opinion by referring the third part of the sample to the central laboratory. on this aspect of the case, it would be worthwhile to consider provision made in sub-section (4) of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968, which is reproduced hereunder for ready reference :'(4) unless the sample has already been tested or analysed in the central .....

New Nandi Seeds Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) X ...

Court : Gujarat

..... rejected lots and losses at processing are returned to farmers only after the foundation seeds are certified as conforming to specifications, the lots are subjected to treatment with insecticides (cell phose, quick phose) and pesticides (thiram and barastin) at the time of packing. the company had filed certificates issued by the seed certification agency and ..... being sown and achieving germination,but in that form they retain the dual utility of being foodgrains as well as seeds. by process of coating and applying insecticides, other chemicals and poisonous substances to the foodgrain meant to be utlised as seeds, one of its basic character, i.e. its consumption as food by ..... and contended that the process is not identical to the case of navbharat seeds (p) ltd., and therefore, assessee is not entitled to deduction under sec. 80ia of the it act. mr. mehta further contended that at least 10 employees are there, and therefore, even if it is a manufacturing process, they are not entitled to .....

Bharatkumar Ishwarbhai Patel Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1727; (1989)1GLR449

..... material with the detaining authority to show that the alleged irregularities were committed 'with a view to making gain'. in her submission the provisions of section 3(1) of the act read with the explanation required that the alleged irregularities should have been committed 'with a view to making gain'. in support of the aforesaid ..... petitioner.16. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the state government is required to make report of the central government as provided under section 3(4) of the act within the specified time limit. it is contended that within this specified time limit report was not made to the central government and, therefore, ..... the order is required to be set aside. section 3(4) of the act provides that the state government shall within seven days report the fact of approval of the order passed by the appropriate officer to the central government .....

State of Gujarat Vs. AlpIn Industries and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2003CriLJ329; (2002)3GLR713

..... ) sc 480. the apex court was dealing with a case under insecticides act, 1968. in reference to section 24 and the scheme of sub-sections (3), (4) & (5) of section 22 of the said act, the court observed that :-'thus, it would be clear that after inspection and seizure of the insecticide, the insecticide inspector shall divide the insecticide into three portions, ascontemplated and in the manner prescribed and deliver ..... one such sample to the manufacturer, or person from whom insecticide was taken. one should be .....

Gujarat Distributors Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1975]36STC116(Guj)

..... c.); a.i.r. 1973 s.c. 78). if therefore the meaning which could be attributed in the commercial sense to the word chemical or to the word insecticides is accepted as a safe basis, the question which would arise to be considered is whether if a consumer of the articles which are disputed in this case goes to ..... . this reference has arisen as the applicant applied to the deputy commissioner, sales tax, on 5th november, 1968, under section 52 of the bombay sales tax act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), for determining the rate of tax payable on the sales of the above-named articles. the tribunal in appeal filed by the petitioner has held that ..... 4 of schedule c of the act and that, therefore, the revenue has rightly taken these articles as covered by the residuary entry 22 of the schedule e. feeling aggrieved by the decision of the tribunal, the petitioner has approached this court in this reference. 3. the articles referred to above are insecticides which are used for the .....

Koli Bhopa Premji Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)1GLR592

..... p.w.15 dhirajlal, signed in his capacity as taluka executive magistrate and put date 02.10.1995 below his signature.it is true that the accused had consumed an insecticide poisonous drug and as said by him, he was unconscious thereafter. he was, first taken to bedala dispensary and, thereafter, he was brought to chotila hospital. if his ..... of ex.51 speaks that bhopa of village navagam (bamanbor) was brought by his mother gangaben on 02.10.1995 and history was given to the effect that the insecticide drug which is being used for sprinkling in the standing croup of cotton, was consumed by bhopa. it is also stated that the preliminary treatment was taken by ..... ble supreme court has observed as follows :-'.......... perfect proof is seldom to be had in this imperfect world and absolute certainty is a myth. that is why under section 3, evidence act a fact is said to be 'proved', if the court considering the matters before it, considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the .....

Umarfaruk Mohmedsafi and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1975)16GLR994

..... or engaged with another in a conspiracy to commit the offence. it is not necessary for the offence of abetment that the act abetted must be committed. this is clear from explanation 2 and illustration (a) thereto, to section 108 i.p.c.in para 9 of the said judgment it is provided as follows:(9). it is only in the ..... to me section 109 of the indian penal code which provides as follows:109. whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this code for the punishment of ..... to murder c.b refuses to do so, a is guilty of abetting b to commit murder.explanation 2 of that section provides as under:explanation 2: to constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be caused.mr. shah also pointed out .....