Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 10 appeal against non registration or cancellation Page 16 of about 2,478 results (0.222 seconds)

Devanshi Impex P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (General) Mumbai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... to human beings. as may be seen, the aforementioned provisions of the said section 38 of the insecticides act, 1968 are unambiguous and leave no scope for interpretation. essentially, the exemption from the provisions of the said act would apply to those insecticides that are used for household purposes etc or for other than insecticidal purposes. thus, import of items listed under schedule 3 of the said ..... chemical, can be used for insecticide purpose and as they are covered under the insecticide act, 1968, the appellant is required to register with central insecticide board (cib). as the appellant has not obtained registration under the insecticide act, 1968, the impugned goods were held liable for confiscation, and, accordingly the same were confiscated absolutely and penalty under section 112(a) of the customs act, 1962 has been imposed on .....

Gujarat Insecticides Ltd. Vs. Ram Niwas and Others

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

..... control laboratory of state agricultural department, haryana which has declared the samples as misbranded, after carrying out chemical analysis of the same. learned counsel invited our attention to section 3(k) of the insecticides act, 1968, in which the definition of misbranded had been given. learned counsel argued that the sample in question does not qualify to be called misbranded in accordance with the ..... provisions contained in section 3(k). moreover, if it is a misbranded insecticide, it is bound to be phytotoxic. learned counsel has also drawn our attention to some interrogatories sent to .....

Kishanchand Assanand Gursahani Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2366

..... by the hon'ble supreme court that the words of section 141(1) (in the present case, the provisions of section 33(1)) need not be incorporated in a ..... be covered by section 33(2) of the said act.6. in 'k.p.g. nair v. jindal menthol india ltd. (2000) jt (suppl) (sc) 519, the hon'ble supreme court had considered the provisions of section 141 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881, which are pari materia with the provisions of section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968. it was held ..... v.m. jain, j.1. this is a petition under section 482, cr.p.c. filed by the accused-petitioner, seeking the quashment of, the criminal complaint dated 19-3-1997, under the insecticides act, 1968 and the rules framed thereunder, copy annexure p-z, the summoning order dated 19-3-1997, copy annexure p-5 and the .....

Madan Dangi and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1987CriLJ138

..... , patti, district amritsar, in consequence of first information report no. 144, dated may 23,1984, of police station patti registered for offences under sections 3k(viii), 17(1), 18(1)(c) read with section 24(1) of the insecticides act, 1968 and section 420, indian penal code.2. the facts as narrated in the petition, may be briefly recapitulated. a letter was addressed by the chief ..... numbers (a) and (b) of para 7 of the petition. let us examine the same.4. the learned counsel has referred to the provisions of section 3(k)(viii) of the insecticides act, 1968 which provides that an insecticide shall be deemed to be misbranded if it has a toxicity which is higher than the level prescribed etc. etc. the straight contention in this behalf .....

Commissioner C. Ex. Vs. Unique Formaid P. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)LC173Tri(Delhi)

..... submission that the product cannot be classified as plant growth regulator as it is not covered under the insecticides act, 1968 as it is not the case of the revenue that the impugned product is an insecticide; further the product is not designed to control insect life that is harmful to man, either directly ..... for ease of reference only; for legal purpose, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes.heading 38.08 applies to "insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides, herbicides, antisprouting products and plant growth regulators; disinfectants and similar products". the heading does not exclude the plant ..... does not mention anywhere the products which are vegetable based. there is no substance in these submissions and findings. both chapter 31 and 38 fall under section vi, the title of which is "products of the chemical or allied industries". if the contention of the respondent is accepted, the impugned product will .....

Pest Control (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1998)9SCC602

..... writ petition filed under article 32 of the constitution of india are challenging the validity of the notification dated 20-9-1996 issued in exercise of the powers conferred under section 27(2) of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') whereby the manufacture, import and use of heptachlor and chlordane has been prohibited with immediate effect. heptachlor and chlordane are ..... insecticides specified in the schedule to the act. the case of the petitioners is that they had imported basic material, namely heptachlor tech. and chlordane tech. for manufacturing formulations known as heptachlor 20-ec .....

Parmeshwar Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

..... and had violated the provisions of insecticides act by selling damaged insecticides.3. after lodging the first information report, the case was investigated and finally chargesheet was submitted under section 409, 420, 468, 471, 418 and 120-b of the indian penal code and section 18 of the insecticides act against nine accused persons including the ..... subsidy to farmers but sale of damaged dithane m-45 was contrary to the insecticides act. the biscomaun did not inform the licencing authority and joint director, plant protection and hence violating the provisions of the act, farmers were supplied with sub standards medicine. it was further alleged that records ..... on the order of agriculture production commissioner, joint director of plant protection, bihar, patna, shri c.s.rai, the informant did physical verification of insecticides of plant protection centre, mainpura. during physical verification, besides the informant shri c.s.rai, d.p.choudhary, assistant director, plant protection, patna, .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Devidas Kishanrao More and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 2, accused shivaji had caught neck of the deceased narayan in the courtyard of house. he sat on the person of deceased narayan. there was endrine i.e. insecticide in bottle, in the hand of accused devidas, and accused vishnu was also present there. thereafter, pw-2 went to call his brother venkati. he narrated incident ..... father of the complainant namely narayan and as a result of it, narayan died. accordingly, offence was registered bearing crime no.78/1995 for the offence punishable under section 302 r/w. 34 of i.p. code. after investigation, the charge sheet was filed, and after full-fledged trial, the trial court acquitted the respondents. hence ..... the case is vitiated by some manifest illegality or the conclusion recorded by the court below is such which could not have been possibly arrived at by any court acting reasonably and judiciously and is, therefore, liable to be characterised as perverse, then, to prevent miscarriage of justice, the appellate court is obliged to interfere. ? .....

The Fertilizer Wholesale Dealers Welfare Association Rep. by Its Gener ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT725

..... commodities act, 1955, with an objective ..... rule 10 of the insecticides rules, 1971, framed under the insecticides act, 1968, a learned single judge of this court has held that no separate licenses need be taken for sale points and godowns. so far as the fertilizers are concerned, their regulatory mechanism with regard to sales and purchase is governed by the fertiliser (control) order, 1985, framed under section 3 of the essential .....

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Prakash Traders

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1987]67STC239(Ker)

..... .pesticides are classified according to the type of organisms they attack; for example, substances that kill insects are known as insecticides; agents that kill fungi are known as fungicides.(encyclopedia americana, vol. 21, page 656)as per section 31 of the insecticides act, 1968, insecticide is defined to include any substance specified in the schedule. copper-sulphate is an item listed in the schedule for the ..... purpose of section 3(e) of the act. the appellate tribunal has also stated that the order issued by the government of kerala .....