Skip to content


Informed - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: informed Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 341 results (0.121 seconds)
Jan 10 2013 (HC)

Baidyanath Prasad Vs. Information Commission

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-10-2013

..... ranchi w p c no 6775 of 2012 baidyanath prasad petitioner versus the jharkhand state information commission ranchi others respondents coram hon ble mr justice alok singh for the petitioner mr .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2013 (HC)

Jimedar Singh Vs. Information Technology

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-31-2013

..... of 2013 jimedar singh petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through principal secretary department of information technology government of jharkhand others respondents coram the honble mr justice aparesh kumar singh for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2013 (HC)

Sigma E Solutions Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Shri Rishi Pandey Vs. I ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-24-2013

..... order of blacklisting is confined to such tenders which are floated by the department of information technology government of jharkhand or jap it in such circumstances apprehension of the petitioner appears .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 2013 (HC)

Rabindra Nath Dwivedi Vs. Information Commission

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-26-2013

..... petitioner in pursuance to the impugned order dated 17 4 2013 passed by the chief information commissioner in appeal case no 2717 of 2011 aparesh kumar singh j a mohanty

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2013 (HC)

Sambhu Prasad Singh Vs. Information Commission

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-23-2013

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w p c no 7466 of 2012 sambhu prasad singh petitioner vs...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 24 2013 (HC)

Chandeshwar Roy Vs. Information Technology

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-24-2013

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w p c no 5323 of 2012 chandeshwar roy petitioner versus the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 2013 (HC)

“(i) the Present Complaint Qua the Information Vs. State Information ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-04-2013

..... under such exemption clause the authority has been vested with the central public information officer state public information officer or the appellate authority as the case may be to even disclose ..... d roop nagar is not tenable the pio concerned has unnecessarily stretched the information sought as personal information about third party as unwarranted invasion on the privacy of the individual a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2013 (HC)

Public Information Officer,uty.of Calicu Vs. Sate Information Commissi ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-04-2013

..... july 2013 13th ashadha 1935 wp c no 11547 of 2008 y petitioners 1 public information officer university of calicut thenhipalam malappuram registrar university of calicut 2 the university of calicut ..... no effective order can be passed in this writ petition directing the university to provide information sought for by the second respondent student moreover it appears that the student is not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 2013 (FN)

South Lanarkshire Council Vs. the Scottish Information Commissioner

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Jul-29-2013

..... exegesis of those questions is required however in the house of commons case the information tribunal unreported 26 february 2008 accepted that necessary carries with it connotations from ..... auditors brought proceedings against austrian radio and other bodies who refused to provide the information and some of the individuals involved brought proceedings contesting the compatibility of the legislation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2013 (HC)

Mahendra Vs. the State Information Commissioner and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

..... e extract from the register maintained in respect of receiving application and furnishing information etc under right to information act relying upon the entry no 133 of the said extract the counsel ..... of mandate of aforesaid provisions said officers are required to be treated as state public information officer the counsel for the petitioner relying upon the extract from the register maintained by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //