Informed - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: informed Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 343 results (0.086 seconds)P.M. Suni and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Jun-15-2012
..... 25 05 1998 reproduced in para 1 therein the postal directorate new delhi has now informed them that the existing recruitment rules are being revised in consultation with dopandt and upsc .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Manoharan Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Government Departme ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
b venkateswara rao judicial member nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL. Muneera Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secretary to Governme ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
dr k b s rajan judicial member 1 the applicant belongings to obc category is serving as a gramin dak...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Cetty Mani and Others Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Governm ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
hon ble mr b venkateswara rao judicial member the applicants belong to scheduled caste community are all similarly placed and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGirish Ramchandra Deshpande. Vs. Cen. Information Commr and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Reported in: (2013)1SCC212
..... hence denied to provide rdquo 4 aggrieved by the said order the petitioner approached the cic the cic passed the order on 18 6 2009 the operative portion of the order reads as ..... the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information g information the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.Subramaniam Vs. the Tamil Nadu Information Commission,, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
..... dismissed no costs consequently connected miscellaneous petition stands closed k chandru j right to information rti act section 6 the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to challenge ..... a complaint to the state information commission the state information commission by the impugned order informed that only an information can be obtained from the rti act there is no necessity to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAppellate Authority and Chairman, Shikshan Prasarak Mandali Vs. State ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
..... the constitution of india the petitioners are challenging the orders passed under right to information act 2005 rti act for short and particularly holding that they are amenable to that act and ..... authority under the act is satisfied that larger public interest warrants disclosure of such information such information will have to be disclosed it is needless to say that the competent authority .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConsolidated Information Services Limited (Formerly Viagogo Limited) ( ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
..... the appellant claimed the weighing exercise involved assessing how much benefit would derive from obtaining information about a single individual as against the infringement of that particular person s right ..... consideration permitted an internet service provider to be ordered to give a copyright holder information on the subscriber to whom the internet service provider had supplied a specific ip .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKashinath Shetye Vs. the Public Information Officer and Others
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
..... impugned orders the learned counsel has pointed out that the information which has been sought comes within the exception as contemplated ..... learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the effect that information which has been sought by the petitioner at serial no ..... second appellate authority the contention to the effect that such information could have been given to the parliament and or to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Central Information Commission and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
Reported in: 2012(3)KLT52(SN)(C.No.52)
..... 8 and in some cases under section 11 of the rti act thus cic has held that the bar under section 74 2 is ..... exercising the power of judicial review and not before the cic as the cic does not exercise the power of judicial review is illogical ..... judgment dated 8th august 2006 passed by respondent no 1 central information commission directing the production of the document correspondences disclosure of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial