Skip to content


Information - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: information Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.071 seconds)
Aug 08 2002 (HC)

Mayank Srivastava Vs. Indian Institute of Information Technology (Deem ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-08-2002

Reported in: (2002)3UPLBEC2729

..... to which petitioner lay his claim remained available candidates according to their merits were given information through courier service in all 152 candidates of general category were called all were given ..... fault or negligence on the part of the respondents in not giving proper information to the petitioner rather information letter sent by the respondents was received at the address of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Bsel Information Systems Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-23-2002

..... or gaining control over the target company pursuant to an agreement or understanding formal or informal directly or indirectly co operate by acquiring or agreeing to acquire shares or voting rights ..... or gaining control over the target company pursuant to an agreement or understanding formal or informal directly or indirectly co operate by acquiring or agreeing to acquire shares or voting rights .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 2002 (TRI)

Mittal Distributors Vs. Ask Me Information Services Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on: Aug-20-2002

..... a deposit of rs 50 000 towards security to the respondent i e ask me information services limited as under 1 rs 5 000 vide d d no 222831 dated 5 ..... the compensation application the respondent is stated to have evolved an innovating method of providing information services on phone to callers buyers from anywhere in the country the relevant part of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 2002 (TRI)

Rainbow Information and anr. Vs. Solution Infotech (India) Pvt.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on: Apr-08-2002

Reported in: I(2003)CPJ72MRTP

comparing its product with santinel super pro by quoting a report of national software testing laboratories nstl which has been placed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2002 (HC)

Umesh Poddar Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-04-2002

..... umesh was also not present since yesterday night then the informant suspected that the appellant umesh poddar had kidnapped his daughter ..... from his house with parvati kumari the daughter of the informant according to him after search he learnt through singheshwar that ..... not find her there thereafter she told the informant about her missing the informant started searching her but she could not be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 2002 (HC)

State of West Bengal Vs. Nilkantha Mahato and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-10-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3566

..... the statement made by the p w 1 in the fir then the fir contains his further allegation that chepulal was assaulted on his ..... thus this important witness has corroborated his statements made in the fir very consistently and also convincingly what is more as we ..... found on the road prankrishna nepal chepulal shambhu and others who informed him that nilkantha and his companions were forcibly cutting paddy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 2002 (HC)

Debabrata Mondal and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-08-2002

Reported in: (2003)1CALLT16(HC)

..... embellished to avoid embellishment or introduction of connected story in the fir it is expected that it should be lodged at the ..... earliest opportunity because the story as given in the fir checks and controls subsequent development 36 from the endorsement at ..... party during the proceedings of the case extra judicial admissions are informal admissions not appearing on the record of the case such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 2002 (HC)

Nil Kamal Ghosh Alias Nilu Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-21-2002

Reported in: (2002)3CALLT618(HC)

..... investigation was started in connection with this case before lodging of fir and therefore the investigation is wholly unauthorized in law and ..... validly during the investigation the said statement cannot be treated as fir as it is hit by section 162 of cr pc ..... of the convict appellant that it has been established that the fir was subsequently manufactured 33 to buttress his above contention sri .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2002 (HC)

Sri Uday Murmu and Two ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-11-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)ALT(Cri)23,(2002)2CALLT65(HC),2002(2)CHN348

..... 10 witnesses pw1 smt raimani hansda is the wife of the informant and informant of the case pw2 lepa hansda is younger brother of the ..... contradictions between the stand taken by pw1 the author of the fir in such fir and her evidence before the court she has pointed out ..... and took her out of the room closely followed by the informant and the informant coming out of the room found that the two other .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 26 2002 (HC)

State of Kerala Vs. Renjith Kumar Alias Renjith and ors.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-26-2002

Reported in: 2003CriLJ1509

..... in consonance with the statements in ext p 1 first information statement after saying that these witnesses gave evidence supporting the ..... regarding the recovery of weapon on the basis of the information given by the first respondent cannot be accepted for the ..... fire the police is expected to initiate proceedings only on getting information regarding the commission of the offence and here in respect .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //