Information Technology Amendment Act 2008 Section 38 - Judgment Search Results

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... prior to the aadhaar act was adequately safeguarded by the provisions of the information 418 technology act 2000 specifically those provisions which were inserted or amended by the information technology amendment act 2008 section 43a of the act provides for compensation for ..... the provisions of section 29 3 read with section 38 g as well as regulation 17 1 d of the .....

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by virtue of the information technology amendment act 2008 inter alia amended section 67 of the it act and introduced section 67a along with section 67b this was for the first time that a specific provision had been ..... in any sexually explicit act or conduct and by further expanding the criminal appeal nos 2161 2162 of 2024 page 38 of 199 scope of actus reus which is punishable under the provision .....

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... significance in the context of section 79 which provides safe harbor to intermediaries in india subject to certain terms enunciated thereunder this court is conscious that a significant amendment to this provision took place in 2008 the information technology amendment act was brought into force on ..... os 540 2011 page 38 can seek safe harbor where the content is uploaded by third party users or is .....

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... as defined under section 2 1 w of the information technology act 2000 as amended by the information technology amendment act 2008 and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of section 79 information technology act 2000 for the ..... johny while dealing with a similar case this court held as under 38 though respondent 1 has roped all the appellants in a criminal case without .....

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... as defined under section 2 1 w of the information technology act 2000 as amended by the information technology amendment act 2008 and is therefore entitled to the exemption from liability in terms of section 79 information technology act 2000 for the ..... johny while dealing with a similar case this court held as under 38 though respondent 1 has roped all the appellants in a criminal case without .....

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... becomes very clear if one peruses section 66 which has been substituted by the information technology amendment act 2008 10 of 2009 w e f 27 10 2009 that section 66 reads as under 66 ..... being slightly troublesome or difficult it also means causing trouble difficulties or discomfort 38 if the information which the person sending knows to be false is sent persistently for causing annoyance then .....

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

resource which directly or indirectly affects the facility of critical information infrastructure to be a protected system explanation for the purposes the respondent in accordance with the provisions of the information technology act 2008 was dismissed 2 few facts which are relevant to enable the petitioner to get the benefit of the amendment the learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied on 66 of the old act the same relates to the act of hacking section 66 of the old act defines hacking new act came into force i e on 12 11 2008 as such the charge ought to have been framed under be a protected system explanation for the purposes of this section critical information infrastructure means the computer resource the incapacitation or

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

which caused great prejudice to the company 6 the first information report was registered on 5 2 2010 as f i the offence under sections 65 and 66 of the information technology act is bailable in view of section 77b of the technology act section 77b was introduced by the information technology amendment act 2008 act 10 of 2009 section 77b provides that inadvertently omitted to notice section 77b of the information technology act however the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as section 77b was introduced by the information technology amendment act 2008 act 10 of 2009 section 77b provides that notwithstanding anything not a fit case for exercising the discretionary jurisdiction under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure by this court

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

2000 and the further amendment to this act by the information technology amendment act 2008 consequential amendments brought about in the act as a sequel to the provisions of the information technology act 2000 and the further amendment to this act by provisions of the information technology act 2000 and the further amendment to this act by the information technology amendment act 2008 as there is no impediment for the same indian evidence act drafted in the year 1872 when our country was under amendment to this act by the information technology amendment act 2008 consequential amendments brought about in the indian evidence act by and act 10 2009 are to be found in several sections of the evidence act namely in sections 22a 45a 47a

Rana Ayyub Vs. Directorate Of Enforcement

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 420 ipc read with section 66d of the information technology amendment act 2008 and section 4 of the black money act 5 in the meantime the petitioner received an order under section 37 of the fema read with section 133 6 of ..... as well as the issue of territorial jurisdiction depend upon facts established through evidence 38 2 that if the issue is one of territorial jurisdiction the same has to be .....