Information Technology Amendment Act 2008 Section 38 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: information technology amendment act 2008 section 38 Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 341 results (2.623 seconds)A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
resource which directly or indirectly affects the facility of critical information infrastructure to be a protected system explanation for the purposes the respondent in accordance with the provisions of the information technology act 2008 was dismissed 2 few facts which are relevant to enable the petitioner to get the benefit of the amendment the learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied on police and hariharasudhan police constable the commission also recommended criminal action against four journalists however the government of tamil nadu decided and chief secretary in the deccan chronicle on 14 4 2008 and for telecast of the same on 14 4 2008 2008 under section 5 of the official secrets act and sections 43 and 66 of the information technology act and sections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2014
..... by the amendment act of 2013 and the relevant extract of the amended section reads thus 370 trafficking of person 1 whoever for the purpose of exploitation a recruits ..... was awaiting information about them from the states from where they had come this request was obviously made ..... ketan parekh 2008 8 scc148 air2008sc2361 115 if the statutes contain wide notwithstanding clauses covering any other law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIncome Tax Officer (TDS) Raipur C.G. Vs. Naya Raipur Development Autho ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
notices to the assessee on 05 11 2007 for furnishing information regarding deduction of tds amount as per the provisions of s 18 the compulsory purchase act 1965 s 5 as amended and para 100 post see also the acquisition of land land clauses consolidation act 1845 s 18 the compulsory purchase act 1965 s 5 as amended and para 100 post see appeals the cit a it was dismissed on 20 10 2008 affirming the findings as well as liability recorded by the tax department the department has filed the present appeal under section 260a of the it act points involved 12 we have
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnvar P.V. Vs. P.K.Basheer and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
explanation for the purposes of this section any reference to information being derived from other information shall be a reference to act it is stated thus new communication systems and digital technology have made drastic changes in the way we live a technology act 2000 hereinafter referred to as it act corresponding amendments were also introduced in the indian penal code 45 of act the very caption of section 65a of the evidence act read with sections 59 and 65b is sufficient to hold the genuineness of the electronic record produced is in question section 45a of the evidence act reads as follows 45a opinion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Bank Association and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
the cheque within fifteen days of the receipt of the information by him from the bank regarding the return of the or other liability 7 this court in electronics trade amp technology development corporation ltd secunderabad v indian technologists amp engineers electronics result of which the object and purpose for which the amendments were incorporated have not been achieved 5 cheque though acknowledged books evidence act 1891 5 the proposed amendments in the act are aimed at early disposal of cases relating to dishonour evidence unless an application is made by the accused under section 145 2 for re calling a witness for cross examination
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayanaguru International Institute Vs. 1.All India Council for Techn ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2014
why action should not be taken for giving manipulated false information and for violation of the terms and conditions of the college was conducting m sc software engineering m sc computer technology and m sc electronic media which were not approved by deficiency iii the building in question was constructed before the amendment made to the tamil nadu town and country planning act the defects the petitioner failed to take any follow up action resulting in passing the impugned order the second respondent further view of the completion of construction before the introduction of section 47 a of the tamil nadu town and country planning
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorld Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Vs. M/S Reshma Collection and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2014
for the new media he observed that while enacting the information technology act 2000 and amending other statutes parliament had consciously 2013 in our view it would be so advancements in technology and the rapid growth of new models of conducting business observed that while enacting the information technology act 2000 and amending other statutes parliament had consciously not amended the trademarks act we are not concerned with the question of cause of action between the appellant plaintiff and its customers in delhi because another v oushadha chandrika ayurvedic india p limited and others 2008 37 ptc269 mad db it was also contended on behalf court b it was concerned only with the provisions of section 20 c cpc and c it was a case of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2014
..... section 65 105 zzzze of chapter v of the finance act 1994 as amended by the finance act 2 of 2009 as null and void in and by which an information technology ..... 16789 2008 16790 2008 21564 2008 23355 amp 23356 2008 24234 2008 25280 25286 2008 27820 27823 2008 27917 amp 27918 2008 28021 amp 28022 2008 29188 2008 662 ..... of india accordingly w p no 26459 2011 is dismissed 38 w p no 26458 of 2011 is filed by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStar India Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Haneeth Ujwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
seeks the protection of such domain privacy services only the information of a forwarding service is made publicly available and no and defendant no 51 the department of electronics and information technology deity for similar reason i e to enforce ensure compliance after discovery in the present suit the plaintiffs undertake to amend the memo of parties and substitute the unknown defendants with as defendants in the present suit as the cause of action against the defendant websites in the present suit arises from it under common law and under section 55 read with sections 37 and 39a of the copyright act 19 the plaintiff 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharati Hexacom Limited Vs. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
2003 defining the term it industries it infrastructure and telecommunications information technology industry as used in the it policy 2000 thereafter a policy 2000 for the development and growth of information technology industry in the state of rajasthan and in furtherance thereto the state commissions tariff order if the insertion in the amended tariff schedule of the discoms is against the tariff order premises used for the conduct of business or any other activity of these commercial and non domestic establishments also offices of filed by the appellant petitioner under section 142 read with section 146 of the electricity act 2003 for the unauthorized action
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT