Skip to content


Induction - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: induction Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.03 seconds)
May 16 2012 (HC)

Mandi Gobindgarh Induction Furnace Association (Regd.) Vs. Punjab Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-16-2012

hemant gupta j challenge in the present writ petition is to regulation 15 of the punjab state electricity regulatory commission...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 2012 (HC)

Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai Vs. Union of India Through Secretary and Ot ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-11-2012

..... whrb 15 mw4sinter plant32400 mtpm5tmt plant10500 mtpm6d i pipe12000 mtpm7ms billets bars arc induction furnace 30000 mtpmthus according to the petitioner after expansion the production capacity of ..... and ductile iron pipes was manufactured without necessary clearance consent in that behalf induction furnaces have been installed for manufacturing ductile iron pipe without prior environmental clearance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 2012 (HC)

Syed Munir Hoda I.A.S. and Others Vs. Mrs. Bader Sayeed and Another

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-08-2012

Reported in: 2012(7)MLJ835

..... also an executive council member she received a proposal to induct certain persons as general body members vide a supplementary agenda ..... the first respondent institution further the attempt by the respondents inducting respondents 6 to 13 as members of the general body ..... discussion on the topic and only thereafter the respondents were inducted the respondents 6 to 13 were highly educated and qualified .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2012 (TRI)

S.L. Dave and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-15-2012

..... factum of the applicants possessing the requisite eligibility conditions the denial of the 8216 induction 8217 is averred to be an infringement of their fundamental rights for fair and ..... possession of eligibility qualifications is stated not to entitle the applicants to seek 8216 induction 8217 several other departments where a similar peculiar situation exists of statistical investigators not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2012 (TRI)

Joseph Andrews and Another Vs. Indian Council of Agricultural Research ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Sep-24-2012

..... the applicants averred that those who were post graduates were directly inducted into ars those who were placed in technical services were ..... acquiring the prescribed qualification the applicants were not considered for induction to ars with effect from 01 10 1975 or from ..... 1 1 1973 to the applicant with all consequential benefits and induct him into the technical service from april 1977 however the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Y.S. Chaudhary and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2012

..... highly illegal and prejudicial to their interest it was averred that the applicants had been inducted against the vacancies pertaining to the examination year 2001 vacancies of 2002 2003 in the ..... is considerable justification for considering positively the request of the applicants to antedate their promotion induction to group a 8217 junior scale of irse from the date when the vacancies actually .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2012 (TRI)

Joseph Andrews and Another Vs. Indian Council of Agricultural Research ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Sep-24-2012

..... the applicants averred that those who were post graduates were directly inducted into ars those who were placed in technical services were ..... acquiring the prescribed qualification the applicants were not considered for induction to ars with effect from 01 10 1975 or from ..... 1 1 1973 to the applicant with all consequential benefits and induct him into the technical service from april 1977 however the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2012 (TRI)

Jawahar Singh Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and Others

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2012

..... held as ineligible 7 obviously the applicant accepted the promotion of postmaster grade i underwent induction training at the cost of department received appointment order as spm tauru did not decline ..... who was declared successful in departmental examination for postmaster grade i after successful completion of induction training was posted on appointment as postmaster grade i at spm tauru s o on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Raj Kumar Jha and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-07-2012

..... year 2010 they were asked to submit unconditional willingness for induction and consent for termination of lien in the danips they ..... is not protected their interest will be jeopardized after getting inducted to ips she further contends that the applicants have completed ..... promotion they may now give their unconditional willingness for their induction in ips within two weeks 11 in terms of our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 2012 (HC)

Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal Senior Advocate with Vs. Punjab State Ele ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-20-2012

..... the said circular was objected to by the association of induction furnace industries another commercial circular no 25 99 was ..... kv only it also contemplated that all other instructions to induction furnaces will remain unchanged after the commencement of electricity act ..... in load for auxiliaries general load pollution control equipment of induction furnace or for not power intensive loads will be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //