Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 section 101 summoning witnesses Court: delhi Page 7 of about 916 results (0.171 seconds)

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... . it may be mentioned that section 25 of the pc act excludes the jurisdiction exercisable by the procedure applicable to army act, navy act, air force act and the border security act. by such exclusion, the court martial was competent even to make trial of the individual when the alleged abettor was not in the picture. therefore, merely the ..... learned counsel for the respondents on the principle of law enunciated by the apex court in the decision reported in p. nallammal and another v. state represented by inspector of police (1999(6) scc 559), wherein it was held that: 10. thus, clause (b) of the sub-section encompasses the offences committed in conspiracy with others or by ..... court in union of india and another v. dineshkumar (2010(3) scc 161). though it related to sections 64, 70, 74, 117(1)(2) and 141 of the border security forces act 1968, the question was whether the court was to give reasons in support of its verdict. placing reliance on the decisions in somdatt datta v. union of .....

Naurang Singh (Ex- Constable ) Vs. the Director General

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)7; 74(1998)DLT377; 1998(46)DRJ482

..... authority dated 22.09.1993.2. the case of the petitioner could be stated tersely in the following terms. since july 1985 the petitioner was serving in central reserve police force. after completing requisite training, the petitioner reported for service in 78 bt. he worked there till 1989. in may/june 1989 he was transferred to e company ..... custody the departmental inquiry was conducted against him and he was removed from service.6. the petitioner issued notice through his counsel to the director general of central reserve police force on 15.10.1995.7. according to the petitioner, the inquiry report was not given to him. the evidence recorded at the time of inquiry was sent ..... competent authority. he came back at his own accord on 5.4.91 at about 0530 a.m. thereby violated the provisions of rule 27 (b)(2) of central reserve police force rules, 1955.9. the learned counsel for the petitioner lt. col c.m. khanna broadly submitted (1) inquiry report was not given to the petitioner; (2) no .....

State Vs. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT404; ILR1979Delhi571

..... that billa retracted his confession.(133) it is contended by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants had been given beating every day by police while in police custody and they had been threatened and tutored to make the statements. bachan singh (dw 3), assistant superintendent central jail, new delhi, is examined ..... the confessions in order to examine whether the confession are voluntary or not.(122) the appellants were arrested on september 9, 1978. they were remanded to police custody till 19th september. on 19th september they were produced before the chief metropolitian magistrate. an application (exhibit ph 79/p-1) was moved by the ..... 79/c) expressing willingness to give the specimens were recorded by the magistrate. specimens were taken in the presence of the magistrate and handed over to the police.(48) on 19th september the appellants were produced before the magistrate for remand. ranga made an application (exhibit pw79/pi) requesting the court to record his .....

Gurnam Singh @ Herjit Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3198; 103(2003)DLT758; 2003(68)DRJ326; 2003(87)ECC586; 2003(1)JCC599

..... of heroin; that he contacted asgar and javed on two-three occasions at the said number and fixed a place; that asgar and javed threw 9 packets from across the border at the fixed place; that he collected the said nine packets and informed tehal singh on his mobile no. 9814231467; that tehal singh told him to hand over the heroin ..... biscuits; that he and balwinder singh were detained under cofeposa in patiala jail; that in 1996, he again started smuggling of gold biscuits; that he was caught by the punjab police with foreign currency worth rs.15/16 lakhs which was given to him by gurcharan singh in exchange of 28 gold biscuits; that he along with 6 other members of ..... singh had come to delhi along with him on 4.10.2001 for delivering the said 9 packet of heroin to vishal on his instruction; that after reaching the delhi border he gave a telephone call to vishal; that vishal had fixed the place for delivery of the said packets of heroin at petrol pump at bhajanpura; that only sukhdev singh .....

Bari Doab Bank Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1998Delhi95; [1997]89CompCas438(Delhi)

..... says - 'i, so and so, by virtue of the authority vested in me, do hereby order and direct this and that'. if the commissioner of police had the power to cancel the license already granted and was the proper authority to make the order, it was incumbent on him to say so in ..... air1993sc1601 , life insurance corporation of india v. consumer education and research centre : air1995sc1811 and anirudhsinhji karansinghji jadeja v. state of gujarat : 1995crilj4154 . 21. in commissioner of police v. gordhandas bhanji, : [1952]1scr135 , the supreme court held as follows (at page 18) : 'turning now to the language used we are clear that by no stretch ..... of natural justice have been violated by the impugned action. 19. the following judgments have been cited to support the proposition as canvassed in this writ petition : 20. commissioner of police v. gordhandas bhanji, : [1952]1scr135 , k.i. shephard v. union of india : (1988)illj162sc , food corporation of india v. kamdhenu cattle feed industries : .....

Gas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Spie Capag, S.A. and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1994Delhi75; 1993(27)DRJ562; ILR1994Delhi131

Anil Dev Singh, J.1. The foremost question in issue in this case is whether or not Section 3 of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 (for short 'FARE Act') is applicable to the arbitration agreement contained in the underlying contract executed by and between Gas Authority of India (for short 'GAIL') on the one hand and SPIE CAPAG, S.A., NKK Corporation and Toyo Engineering Corporation (for short 'Consortium') on the other. The second question which arises is : If Section 3 of the FARE Act is applicable then whether or not proceedings before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (respondent No. 4), initiated by the Consortium for appointment of three member Arbitral Tribunal for adjudication of the claims raised by it against GAIL, should be permitted to continue. 2. The facts of the case may be stated as under : GAIL is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Hotel Samrat, Chan...

Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)342; 86(2000)DLT246

..... to compensate the victims. (see rudul sah, v. state of bihar, sebastian m. hongray v. union of india, saheli, a women's resources centre v. commissioner of police, delhi police headquarters, state of maharashtra v. ravikant s. patil). in nilabati behera v. state of orissa hon'ble mr. justice j.s. verma observed as under: (scc p ..... bihar, sebastian m. hongray v. union of india, bhim singh v. state of j & k, saheli; a women's resources centre v. commissioner of police, delhi police headquarters and state of maharashtra v. ravikant s. patil the liability of the state of orissa in the present case to pay the compensation cannot be doubted and was ..... he submitted that the petitioner have imp leaded a large number of authorities, including municipal corporation of delhi (respondent no. 4), delhi vidyut board (respondent no. 6), delhi police (respondent no. 3), delhi fire service (respondent no. 5) and medical services (respondent no. 8 & 9) and various members of the ansal family. he submitted that .....

Sikander @ Mohd. Shafi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1992(2)Crimes970; 1992(24)DRJ295; ILR1993Delhi40

..... as culprits as a result of much thought, consultation and discussion. to avoid these dangers, the courts have always insisted upon the prompt lodging of the report to the police....'. there is no dispute with the said proposition of law. however, we are of the view that there is no delay in lodging the fir in the instant case ..... not struck against him. however, the appellant tried to free himself on being caught hold of by the police. his statement is thus altogether different from the statement of public witness i ghulam mohd. public witness i ghulam mohd. has averred that public witness 3 fateh mohd. ..... the dagger and apprehension of the appellant was done while sitting on the jeep at seelampur. he further goes on to state that the appellant was surrounded by the police and was thus not allowed to run away. public witness 19 si mahabir singh, on the other hand, has stated that while apprehending the appellant the jeep was .....

Jaininder JaIn and ors. Vs. Arihant JaIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC492(Del)

V.K. Jain, J.1. These Appeals are directed against the common Order dated 8.4.2009 passed in IA 2552/2004 in CS(OS) No. 155/2004, IA 2551/2004 in CS(OS) No. 156/2004, IA 2550/2004 in CS(OS ) No. 157/2004, whereby the status quo order dated 7.1.97 passed in CS(OS) No. 156/04 was vacated and the appellants were restrained from using the trademark 'Kangaro' for stationery items, till the final disposal of these suits. The brief facts, giving rise to these appeals are as under.2. Late Shri Janki Dass Jain, father of Shri Arihant Jain, Jaininder Jain and Shri Vishwa Jain, who was doing business in the name and style of M/s.Kangaro Industries (Regd.) as its sole proprietor, adopted and started using trademark 'KANGARO'. On 3.3.1963, late Shri Janki Dass Jain and his son Arihant Jain, vide partnership deed dated 3.4.1963, agreed to become partners in M/s.Kangaro Industries (Regd.), with share of Shri Janki Dass Jain at 63 per cent and that of Shri Arihant Jain at 37 per cent. On 1.4.1974, Shr...

Urmila Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT644; 2008(101)DRJ20

..... deceased, urmila disclosed that her husband (kanhaiya lal) was murdered by her and anil on 19.10.2002. in pursuance of the disclosure statement urmila took the police party to her residence at om nagar. one abid hussain and shiv prasad mehto residing in the neighborhood joined in the investigation; the appellant confessed her guilt and ..... , badarpur. the husband of the deceased was missing for more than one month and a half from 8.12.2002. admittedly, the appellant did not inform the police about the disappearance of her husband nor she informed any of the neighours or close relations including brothers of the deceased. on being informed telephonically, hira lal bharti ..... and met the wife of the deceased appellant herein. as no satisfactory explanationn was given by the appellant, the matter was reported to the reported to the police. the appellant was interrogated and she admitted killing her husband with the help of one anil. the accused/appellant made a disclosure statement ex.pw-5/c .....