Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.600/2004 % Reserved on:13. h December, 2017 Date of Decision:20. h April, 2018 KAUSHALYA DEVI REPRESENTATIVES (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by Kaushalya Devi, since deceased and now represented by her legal representative, relates to assessment year 1994-95 and arises from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short) dated 5th May, 2004 in ITA No.6259/Del of 1997 and ITA No.826/Del of 1998.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 18th October, 2005, on the following substantial question of law:-"ITA6002004 Page 1 of 31 Whether ITAT was, on a ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... coinciding with the date on which the deposition of the prosecutrix was scheduled to be recorded by the trial court. inspector ram niwas, station house officer of the police station nabi karim also present in the court has informed that he is obliged under the law and, therefore, intends to register an fir formally taking note of the ..... being accused again of committing rape, the prosecutrix child, who had earlier accused of such acts, it forming part of case arising out of fir no.218/2014 of police station nabi karim. both the cases are pending trial in the same court. fact, gang rape, against the prosecutrix had supported the case for prosecution in her examination ..... was submitted, the following order was passed:-" status report filed. heard for some time. offences under in involving the case arising out fir no.224/2016 of police station nabi karim sections 354a/365/367/376/377 ipc and section 4 of protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 presents a sordid story of the same .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... contained in the crpc, no information about the commission of an offence under tada shall even be recorded without the prior approval of the district superintendent of police and under section 20a(2) no court shall take cognizance of any offence under tada without the previous sanction of the authorities prescribed therein. section 20a, ..... 18.01.2018 shows that during the course of investigation, it was revealed that number of traders were engaged in the loc trade having relatives across the border, who were closely associated with banned terrorists organisation and the ex-militants and their family members were using crl.a. 615/2019 page 5 of 21 ..... proceed against the accused. the germane portion of the judgment is extracted below: 50. as discussed earlier, while taking cognizance of an offence based upon a police report, it is the satisfaction of the magistrate that there is sufficient ground to proceed against the accused. as discussed earlier, along with the second supplementary charge .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Reported in : (1993)47ITD374(Delhi)
1 to 7. [These paras are not reproduced here as they involved minor issues.] 8. Ground No. 5 is relating to addition of Rs. 2,74,600 on account of unexplained cash credits assessed as income from undisclosed sources.Assessing Officer had noticed credits in the name of family members of the partners as under : Assessee had furnished confirmations from these creditors and proof that these amounts had been received by means of cheques. They were also claimed to be regular income-tax payers. The Assessing Officer summoned the creditors, being the family members of the partners of the firm and recorded their statements. On analysing the statements, he was of the view that the credits in the name of the family members of the partners were not genuine and that the assessee had introduced his own money in its books of accounts. He accordingly assessed the entire sum of Rs. 2,74,600 as income of the firm from undisclosed sources. The first appellate authority held that under Section 68 of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 10.2017 Pronounced on:30. 10.2017 LPA1422017 & CM No.7912/2017 CHITRA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, Advocate versus AIRLINE ALLIED SERVICES LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri & Ms. Abhilasha Singh, Advocates for respondent No.1 Ms. Anjana Gosain & Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 The appellant is aggrieved by the dismissal of her writ petition, by a learned single judge, through his judgment, dated 30 November 2016. She had claimed a direction to the respondent Airlines Allied Services Ltd (hereafter Airlines Allied) a Central public sector company and a subsidiary of Air India Ltd. Airlines Allied provides support services to Indian Airlines such as air transport services; it also provides air transport services under the name "Alliance Air" to renew her ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA3092016 BHARAT MAL @ BHARAT KUMAR Date of decision : Judgment reserved on :06. 12.2018 13.12.2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.L.B.Rai and Mr.Mohit Kumar, Advocates RAM AVTAR versus Through: Mr. Yogesh Aggarwal and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Vireshwar Tyagi,Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present Regular Second Appeal No.309/2016 assails the impugned judgment dated 29.8.2016 of the First Appellate Court of the District & Sessions Judge-East, Karkardooma in RCA No.257/2016 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant herein Bharat Mal @ Bharat Kumar against the impugned judgment dated 28.3.2016 of the Senior Civil Judge-East, Karkardooma, Delhi in suit No.6588/2016 was dismissed.2. Vide judgment dated 28.3.2016 of the learned Trial Court in suit No.6588/16, the suit filed by the plaintiff herein arrayed as the respondent to the present appeal seeking the grant of a decree of pos...
Tag this Judgment!