Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 section 101 summoning witnesses Court: delhi Page 11 of about 916 results (0.202 seconds)

Jul 16 2010 (HC)

R.K. Sharma Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... has referred to the depositions of the witnesses whose statements were recorded in the preliminary inquiry. however, the petitioner does not dispute that the sho of the police station etmadpur informed him about the apprehension of the women and the recovery of the stolen coal. there is clear admission by the petitioner of several material ..... singh with other civil police personnel. inspector prem singh had clearly stated that he had informed the petitioner on the phone about the apprehension of nine women with stolen coal when ..... inquiry officer has carefully considered the evidence laid in support of these allegations. reliance has been placed on the statement of inspector prem singh of the civil police, etmadpur who has referred in detail of the apprehension of the women and recovery of the stolen railway property in the above circumstances by si chander bhan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2002 (HC)

Pfizer Products Inc. Vs. B.L. and Company and ors.,

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002(25)PTC262(Del)

..... in the dental journal which admittedly has very restrict circulation. mere publication of such advertisement and materials in dental journal cannot and would not establish a trans-border reputation. such reputation, if any, was confined to a particular class of people i.e. the persons subscribing to the said specialised journals and cannot be ..... counsel for the defendants argued that since there were no sale or advertisement in india by the plaintiff, the plaintiff could not make out a case of cross-border reputation in support of this proposition. the defendants sought to rely upon the case of n.r.dongre versus whirlpool corporation (supra), smithkline beecham plc. versus ..... of which will determine its fate:- 1. whether the plaintiff has locus standi to file the present suit? 2. whether the product viagra has acquired trans border and/or spill over reputation in india? 3. whether the defendants product 'penegra' is deceptively and confusingly similar to that of the plaintiff's viagra? or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2010 (HC)

Jai Singh and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... statement under section 313 of the criminal procedure code that the deceased and his two companions raj kumar and jai kumar who were killed in an encounter with the police were aggressors and that they had trespassed in the house of the appellants and attacked them by lathis, jelly and guns and that both the appellants had ..... has not been established that a complaint was registered pursuant to the alleged call made by mr. mahender singh, pw-8 brother of the deceased to the police station samaipur badli. according to the learned counsel as it has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the appellants had also received injuries, consequently the appellants ..... incident of stabbing. however on the complaint of mother of the appellants, the fir was not registered and it was registered only with the intervention of the higher police officials on 15th november, 1992.17. the learned counsel for the appellant, ms. gauba has also relied on the report dated 20th july, 1993 of central forensic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2004 (HC)

Smt. Bashiram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004(77)DRJ497

..... sarpanch of a village(b) any serving or retired gazetted officer, civil or military, including a jco(c) sub postmaster(d) qanungo or patwari(e) sub inspector of police(f) a member of municipal corporation or committee or zilla parishad/district board.(g) panchayat president/village munsif/patel/village officer/panchayat executive officer.(h) m.p. /m.l ..... made by sh. jamaluddin, father of late ex-rfn. kadar khan or his brother in their communications dated 29th september, 2001 & 30th september, 2001 to the police.4. according to the respondent no. 6 she continued to cohabit at the residence of her husband and the petitioner even after his death and that she had no ..... is further alleged that late ex-rfn. kadar khan died that night after taking his dinner and that the death was in suspicious circumstances. despite intimation to the police and representations(under section 26 of the army act) to the respondents no. 1-5, they were not granting or releasing the terminal benefits to which heirs of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2001 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajiv Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)607; 96(2002)DLT225

..... smt. kausalya devi bogra and ors. etc. v. land acquisition officer, aurangabad and anr., : [1984]2scr900 , judicial notice was taken by the court that aurangabad city had developed rapidly following police action which brought about accession of the nizam's state with india. aurangabad had become the regional headquarters of a zone of the state. the city had been industrially developing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2000 (HC)

Gopal Singh Vs. Indian Railway Const. Company Ltd.(ircon)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ845Del

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. There are five petitioners in CWP. 629/98. Their services have been dispensed with by the Indian Railway Construction Company Limited, hereinafter called the IRCON. They have challenged the orders passed by the first respondent. Before I notice the case of the petitioners, it will be relevant to state about the formation of the IRCON. 2. IRCON was incorporated in the year 1976 under Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is a Government of India enterprises, run under the aegis and control of the Ministry of Railways. The main purpose for which the Company was formed was for the construction of railway tracks, roads, highways, buildings for Government and other works working under the Government, canals and other construction activities on commercial basis. It has its central office in New Delhi. The Company has a few engineers, other professionals and staff for the purpose of administration. The IRCON undertakes projects at various places in India and abroad. Dependi...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1994 (HC)

J.S. Arneja Vs. National Co-operative Consumers Federation of India Lt ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1995Delhi44; 1994(28)DRJ546

..... of the features may emerge so boldly and prominently that a second view may not be possible. there may yet be other cases where the matter would be on the border line and it would be difficult to take one view or the other outright. (50) mr. sethi. learned counsel for the petitioner, has also cited the following judgments:- 1.b .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2011 (HC)

Surender Kaur and Others Vs. S. Pritipal Singh

Court : Delhi

..... the petitioner santanu chaudhuri (the landlord) by eviction of the respondent subir ghosh (the tenant) or anybody else found in occupation of the premises, if necessary, with the help of police, within one month of presentation of a certified copy of this order before the trial court. we make it clear that this order will not prevent or prejudice the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2008 (HC)

Kamaljeet Singh (In Judicial Custody) Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT170; 2008(101)DRJ582

..... to make the statement before the cmm, delhi, while in police custody. further, the said confessional statement by neeraj chopra was not inculpatory in nature and as such ought not be relied upon.26. the learned special judge, he ..... section 18 of the mcoca, and, thereforee, the said confessional statement cannot be relied upon. as borne out by the records, neeraj chopra had been asked by the police officials to co-operate, otherwise he will get involved in this case. hence, the said confessional statement was not voluntary in nature as neeraj chopra had been forced ..... . 24. mr. lekhi further submitted that despite the fact that the prosecution has filed hundred of pages of phone calls records and despite the fact that the police officials have also seized the phone from one of the girls alleged to be a prostitute, the prosecution has not placed on record a single call between the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1987 (HC)

DechIn Bisht Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1988Delhi87

..... ) the counter version of the petitioners is that on 20-6-86, they along with 51 other passengers were traveling in the bus from kathmandu to delhi. after crossing the indo-nepal border, the bus was stopped at kakrahi by the customs officials. on examination of the luggage of the passengers, they discovered several contraband items. the customs officials demanded a sum ..... judicial magistrate basti but in spite of that, the petitioners could not unfold their miseries as the officers present there insisted that they should converse in hindi and not. in tibetan. language.(9) during the night, the detenus were tied up in a dark room and again tortured. in this way, the customs officials and others forced the detenus to make .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //