Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 preamble 1 indo tibetan border police force act 1992 Sorted by: old Court: punjab and haryana Page 5 of about 55 results (0.354 seconds)

Aug 29 2005 (HC)

Rachpal Singh, Inspector Vs. State of Punjab Through Principal Secreta ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)142PLR183

..... to the rank of sub inspector, by an order dated september 20, 2002, which is indicative of an order dated september 14, 2002 passed by the deputy inspector general of police (border range), amritsar vide which he had been brought on promotion list e-ii (exemptee) with effect from 7.9.2002 pursuant to the order passed by deputy inspector general of ..... on september 9, 2002. he was also approved for promotion to the rank of sub inspector police. however, a communication dated september 21, 2004, was issued by the director general of police, punjab to the deputy inspector general of police (border range) amritsar, which indicates that the petitioner along with others had been approved for the grant of local rank in exercise of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2006 (HC)

Yadwinder Sharma Vs. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2008ACJ1422; (2007)147PLR670

..... any evidence to discharge the said onus.12. the tribunal unfortunately misdirected itself in relying upon the alleged statement of the brother of the deceased which is incorporated in the police report ex.a4. the brother of the deceased neither witnessed the accident nor was he travelling in the same car. in the said report, he has mentioned what he ..... large that the driver of the vehicle acted carelessly or in a gross negligent manner.7. on the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has also relied upon the police report ex.a4 to contend that the same was recorded on the statement of dinesh kumar - brother of the deceased, in which it is nowhere mentioned that the accident ..... over the bridge and fell into the canal. learned counsel has referred to the documents like ex.a4, copy of report no. 33 dated october 5, 1983 of police station rajpura as well as copy of the ddr to contend that neither it was a case of any apprehensive head-on collusion with a vehicle comin from the opposite .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2008 (HC)

Hardyal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR142

..... petitioner has not completed 20 years of qualifying service and, thus, he is not entitled to pension under rule 48-a of 1972 pension rules and that the provisions of indo-tibetan border police act, 1992 (hereinafter to be referred as 'itbp act') and the rules framed thereunder are not applicable in view of section 157 of the itbp act as the ..... rule 49(2)(b) of the central civil services (pension) rules, 1972 (hereinafter to be referred as '1972 pension rules'.2. the petitioner was enrolled as constable in indo tibetan border police (hereinafter to be referred as 'itbp') on 02.04.1965. he resigned in the year 1976 on account of illness of his father which was allowed and he was made ..... by the petitioner on the judgment in raj kumar v. union of india : air2006sc938 is not tenable. the rule discussed in the aforesaid case was rule 19 of border security force rules, 1969 wherein an amendment was carried out on 27.12.1995 so as to grant pension to a member of the force who resigned from the force .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2008 (HC)

Sunita Rani Vs. Ramesh Chander

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)152PLR143

Permod Kohli, J.1. Invoking revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 15(5)of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), landlady has filed this Revision challenging the findings recorded by the Rent Controller, Faridkot and the Appellate Authority dismissing the eviction petition. It is necessary to briefly refer to the facts on record.2. The petitioner-landlady (hereinafter referred to as 'the landlady') filed Eviction Petition under Section 13 of the Act against Respondents No. 1 and 2 are the tenants in the shop and gallery situated in Moti Bhur Bazar, Kotkapura bearing Municipal No. B-VI/97. The premises was purchased by the landlady and her husband's brother Sunil Kumar respondent No. 3 in the Eviction Petition from S.S. Jain Sabha. Respondents No. 1 and 2 were tenants under Jain Sabha and after the purchase of property by the landlady and Sunil Kumar, they have attorned them as landlord.3. The landlady filed the Eviction Pe...

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2009 (HC)

Gurleen Kaur and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2009NOC2988(F.B)(P&H)

..... history, having taught the subject of history at the punjab university, chandigarh, layalpur khalsa college, jalandhar and gurmat college, patiala. he was selected to the indian police service and commenced training thereof in 1970. in the meantime, he was selected to the indian administrative service and came to be appointed as such in 1971. his ..... sikh minority institute, and as such, enjoyed a special status under the constitution of india. in a letter received by us, the tone and tenor was almost bordering on a threat. we were advised that no human institution can define the sikh religion, and as such, even an attempt should not be ventured in that ..... community candidates shall be done purely on the basis of merit." as a matter of fact, the supreme court in achayaraya jagdishwaranand avadhuta etc. v. commissioner of police, calcutta and another, air 1984 sc 51, expressly held that courts have the power to determine whether a particular rite or observance is regarded as essential by .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2010 (HC)

The State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the jeweller and asi suraj pal singh. the statement of cw2-si gurmeet singh is categorical to the effect that no information was sent by jagraon police to mehna police, the police station in question, in respect of identification of the recovery of the articles. there is no wireless message, special messenger or any other mode of ..... . in respect of another question, he has answered that there is no document or entry in the case diary for giving intimation to any of the police officer of police station mehna regarding recovery. he stated that there is a possibility that the intimation might have been given through wireless message. in response to further question ..... of such permission granted, the assailants were arrested and further investigations made. the samples of finger prints and foot prints of the assailants were taken by the police of police station mehna. exhibits p-34, p-35 and p-36, are the recovery memos of shoes worn by accused harjinder singh, satwant singh and manjit singh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2012 (HC)

Present: Mr. Gaurav Sethi Advocate Vs. Sanjay Jaggi ........ Appellant

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... appears that he has filed the petition to create a defence, in his favour, in the criminal proceedings, initiated at the behest of his wife by lodging an fir in police station city panipat. another possibility is that he sought a decree of restitution of conjugal rights, and if allowed, to be used later on as a ground for divorce. the ..... the petition was filed by the appellant as a counter blast to fir no.505 dated 04.10.2005, registered under sections 498-a/406 of indian penal code, in police station city panipat. she has averred that the appellant is a hot tempered and cruel person who has no sympathy or respect for any human being. the appellant is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Arun Bansal Advocate Vs. the Central Govt. Through Secret ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... mr.gurpreet singh, advocate, senior panel counsel for union of india. ***** ranjit singh, j. an important question of law relating to holding of re-trial of a person serving in indo tibetan border police force (for short, itbpf .) after setting-aside an earlier trial, is raised in the present petition. in the absence of any provision permitting retrial, the question raised would deserve ..... . again a division bench of the delhi high court had the occasion to deal with the provisions of re-trial in respect of a person subject to the jurisdiction of border security force act. in the case of nirmal lakra versus union of india, 2003 (2) s.c.t.588, the division bench has held that the earlier trial ..... revoking and suspension period of both the persons w.e.f.12.5.2k to 8.89.2k is treated as duty for all purposes. sd/-commandant xith bn.itb. police . consequent to passing of order, annexure p-5, the petitioners were once again subjected to trial by sfc, which was held on 3.11.2000. they were found .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2013 (HC)

Dr.Manu Gupta Vs. the State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... p.c.m.s.(dental)/p.d.e.s.candidates with three years service are also treated as eligible in case such candidates have rendered two years service in difficult border areas. in my opinion, this provision is mandatory in character. the very use of the word 'shall' in the opening line of this paragraph, in the light of the object .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2014 (HC)

Anil Kumar Sharma Son of Narendra Dev Sharma Resident of Vs. Asha Shar ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and defalcated that, as also, treated her with cruelty. on the basis of fir no.43 dated 20.04.1994 under sections 498-a, 406 ipc, police of police station civil lines, amritsar investigated the allegations levelled, therein, by the respondent against the appellant, his parents and sister. the appellant, his parents and his ..... marriage act before the matrimonial court, the respondent filed a criminal case vide fir no.43 dated 20.04.1995 under sections 498a, 406 of ipc in police station civil lines, amritsar, wherein, the appellant, his parents and sister were acquitted. the respondent willfully deserted the appellant and she unsuccessfully prosecuted the appellant ..... thereafter, the respondent lodged an fir against the appellant and his family members including his father, mother and unmarried sister and they were arrested by the police on 13.05.1995. the respondent also filed a petition for maintenance under section 125 cr.p.c.against the appellant. this indicated that she had withdrawn .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //