Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 2000CriLJ4530
..... of personnel and training) on 10-8-1993 authorising the cbi to investigate the case under section 6 read with section 5(1) of the delhi special police establishment act referred to above. the objection of learned counsel for the petitioner is that this notification has not been expressed in the name of the president. learned ..... section 20 of tada. the inspector general of police did not accord sanction for prosecution. thereafter, an amendment application was moved on behalf of the petitioner by learned counsel in which an amendment was sought in ..... of the petitioner in the aforesaid case crime. it was stated that the state government had sent direction to the director general and the inspector general of police meerut zone directing them not to afford sanction for prosecution under the tada and the designated court under tada released all the persons arrested by the cbi under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Reported in : (2000)73ITD49(All.)
..... of the so called warrant of authorisation was not given and rather the petitioner was made to sign some blank forms in the presence of large police contingent. a photo copy of excessive show of police force may be seen in annexure 25." "1. because the respondent no. 2 had no material of any kind whatsoever which could lead to the formation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Reported in : (2000)75ITD183(All.)
1. In this appeal, against the order of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Investigation), Kanpur, dated 28-11-1997, the assessee has challenged the assessment for the block period, completed under the provisions of Chapter XIVB of the Income-tax Act. The block period is from 1-4-1994 to 28-11-1996.2. This appeal was heard on priority basis as directed by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The Hon'ble Court, vide its order dated 23-7-1999, has directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal by 15th September, 1999.3. In the grounds of appeal, initially, the assessee took as many as 46 grounds. As many of these grounds were argumentative in nature, an objection was filed on behalf of the Department on 19-4-1999 alleging that these grounds being in the nature of written arguments, either should not be allowed, or in the alternative, the assessee should not be allowed to make arguments, simultaneously.4. The appellant moved an application for admitting additional grounds.Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3531
..... or executive in the district of allahabad, aligarh. lucknow or fatehpur and he shall accept the surrender irrespective of enquiry about the offence or absence thereof. he shall inform the police officer concerned of the area in which he is living who in his turn arrange for taking custody of the person of the petitioner and keep him in protective custody .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1997All291
ORDERB.M. Lal, J.1. Both these petitions being based on the similar facts and taw arc being disposed of by this common judgment.2. 'M/s. Brij Mohan Rice Mill (hereinafter referred to as the Unit) is a partnership firmregistered under the Partnership Act. Sri Cyan Singh son of Sri Kandhai Lal, Prem Singh son of Sri Brij Mohan, Smt. Indira Devi wife of Sri Brij Mehan and Smt. Pan Kumari daughter of Sri Manohar Singh are partners of the unit.It appears that the Unit was sanctioned a loan of Rs. 14-50 lacs on 2-4-1988 by the U.P. Finan-cial Corporation (for short the Corporation) but later on it was cancelled by the Managing Director of the Corporation on 14-9-1988. Thereafter by order dated 27-2-1991 the Managing Director revived the loan and ultimately on 13-8-1991 agreement was executed between the parties. As per the terms and conditions of agreement the loan amount does not seem to have been paid to the Corporation, therefore, the Corporation issued notice dated 12-8-94 under S. 29 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1996All375
..... that section 29-a itself was struck down. subsequently, r.s. joshi v. ajit mills ltd. : [1978]1scr338 . set aside its earlier decision in ashoka marketing ltd. (supra). later in indo international industries v. state of u. p., 1983 uptc 1195 : (1981 tax lr 2902) (all), learned single judge held in view of r.s. joshi's case : [1978]1scr338 (supra .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1996All135
ORDERV.N. Khare, J.1. Two Judges of this Court having differed in their opinion on the question of competence of State Legislature to enact U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. XXIV of 1964) (in short, the Adhiniyam) have referred the following point of difference to third Judge for opinion:'Whether by virtue of Section 18G of the Industrial (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, the State Legislature stood denuded of power to legislate regulating supply, distribution and price of molasses-a product of sugar industry, and was conse-qeuntly incompetent to enact Sections 7, 8 and 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. 24 of 1964)?'Hon'ble the Chief Justice instead of referring the matter to the third Judge, constituted this Full Bench to answer the point of difference between the two Judges and that is how the matter has come up before us. It arises in the context of statement made in the Lok Sabha by the Minister of State in the Ministry of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 1995CriLJ1067
..... cri): 'then sum and substance of the above deliberation result in a conclusion that the investigation of an offence is the field exclusively reserved for the police officers whose powers in that field arc unfettered so long as the power to investigate into the cognizable offences is legitimately exercised in strict compliance with the ..... desired by the informant to be examined by the police and possibly they are proceeding. in the mean while the petitioners have moved this petition for writ of certiorari quashing the said first information report and ..... of sindhuja prasad singh, rajendra prasad verma, it appears that a number of first information reports, if they could be so called were lodged by the police conveying the formation of a group for the purposes of carrying out foregery, impersonation and falsification of documents sometime also relating to courts. the matter was .....
Tag this Judgment!