Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 18 results (0.113 seconds)

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... compensation as their fate despite they being aggrieved and dissatisfied. in some of the writ petitions, allegations have also been made that farmers resorted to agitations which was crushed by police force. it is useful to refer to the pleadings in some of the cases by which the petitioners have given justifications for approaching the court with delay. we have already ..... under the 1997 rules. it is pleaded that when the petitioners did not accept the compensation, they were tortured by the local police and their signatures were forcibly obtained on the agreement. they were also taken away by the police and proceedings under section 107/116 of cr.p.c. were initiated against the petitioners on 13th september, 2007. it is pleaded .....

J.S. Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2782

Amitava Lala and A.P. Sahi, JJ.1. The petition raises an interesting question as to whether the petitioner has been lawfully discontinued as Member of the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission as per the provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 as amended by Act No. 43 of 2006.2. A State Human Rights Commission was set up in the State of Uttar Pradesh under a Notification dated 4.4.1996 of the provisions of the aforesaid Act ; a copy of the said Notification constituting the State Human Rights Commission is Annexure-4 to the writ petition.3. The petitioner, who was undisputedly a District Judge under the Judicial Services of the State of Uttar Pradesh, was nominated and appointed as a Member of the Uttar Pradesh State Human Rights Commission under the provisions of Section 21 read with Section 22 of the Act as it stood then. The Notification to that effect was issued on 29.6.2006 ; a copy whereof is Annexure-1 to the writ petition. The terms of appointment of the petition...

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

..... under:the sum and substance of the above deliberation results in a conclusion that the investigation of an offence is the field exclusively reserved for the police officers whose powers in that field are unfettered so long as the power to investigate into the cognizable offences is legitimately exercised in strict compliance ..... offence, he must either proceed with the investigation or cause an investigation to be proceeded with by his subordinate; that in a case where the police officer sees no sufficient ground for investigation, he can dispense with the investigation altogether; that the field of investigation of any cognizable offence is exclusively ..... demarcated sphere of activity in the field of crime detection and crime punishment. investigation of an offence is the field exclusively for the executive through the police department, superintendence over which vests in the state government. once it investigates and finds an offence having been committed, it is its duty to collect .....

Vivek Srivastava Son of Late Sri J.P. Srivastava Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2897; 2005(3)ESC1790

..... civil areas. in fact, the new cantonment begins from old polo ground itself. consequently, the old polo ground is collocated with the civilian areas, being on the border of the municipal and the cantonment limits.preliminary objections: 14. the union of india has raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition ..... high court of judicature at allahabad on the south-west, the government press, directorate of education. board of high school and intermediate board, board of revenue, police head quarters and the accountant general's office on the east, the elgin road and the allahabad bank on the south, and a portion of the residential complex ..... in the cantonment limits for the last 60 years, but before that, it was with the municipal authorities and used as a polo ground.63. 'polo ground' borders the municipal and the cantonment limits. over the years, the town has grown. instead of expanding, the town has grown from within consuming me open spaces of land .....

Vipul Gupta (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, Medical Educati ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC3070

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard Shri PS. Baghel, Advocate, Shri Sandeep Dixit, Advocate, Shri R.R.Awasthi, Advocate and Shri Manish Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri I.B.Singh, learned Counsel for the respondents No. 4 and 5 of the Standing Counsel.2. These bunch of writ petitions involved common question of fact and law, hence, heard and decided by common judgment with the consent of parties.3. The controversy relates to admission in the Post Graduate Medical Courses of the State of U. P though U.P. Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination, 2004 (in short, herein after referred as UPPGMEE), which provided that only those candidates shall be eligible to appear in the examination and will be entitled for admission in pursuance to UPPGMEE, who have passed their MBBS or BDS courses from the recognized Medical Colleges situated in the State of U.P. Accordingly there is 100 per cent institutional reservation for admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses held through UPPGM...

Asha Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2233

..... accused.2. where the allegations in the first information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the f.i.r. do no disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an by police officers under section 156(1) of the code except under an order of a magistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the code.3. where the uncontroverted ..... by learned counsel for the applicant in revision that though the entire allegations made against the applicant in revision are false and have been made in collusion with local police of ghaziabad after a long gap of 15 months as a counter blast to the complaint made by husband of the applicant against in-laws of the deceased that ..... were found in that very house on 21-3-1998. shri rajeev kumar sharma opposite party no.2 elder brother of deceased praveen sharma lodged a written report at police station indrapuram, ghaziabad stating therein that his brother praveen sharma aged about 30 years was serving in c.p.w.d. construction division, new delhi on the post .....

Sanjay Goel (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002CriLJ625

..... immediately is attracted and the bar comes into play. such an interpretation is most unwholesome. it will amount to unusual fetters in the investigative powers of the police. it could not be the intention of any law. a harmonious construction is, therefore, need of the hour because the investigating agency clearly has unfettered powers ..... to investigate a case. no courts can interfere with this power of the police at any stage. there are various provision in the code of criminal procedure where the assistance of a court, during investigation, is permitted. where a proclamation ..... 164, cr.p.c. if the courts are precluded, as argued by the learned counsel for the defence from making any such direction the dictum of police having unfettered powers shall be thrown to winds. investigation is nothing but collection of facts and circumstances as evidence. obtaining expert's opinion during investigation on .....

Union of India and Another Vs. Chief Justice of High Court of Judicatu ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(3)ARBLR427(All); 2001CriLJ263

..... arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.2. m/s. suristh tiwary (respondent no. 2) filed a petition under section 11 of the act on the grounds, inter alia, that m/s. border roads organisation awarded a contract for supply of earth for construction of varanasi-ram nagar-mugalsarai road and an agreement in that connection was executed between the parties on february .....

Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2367

..... and order, their built and appearance have direct impact on their effectiveness. after taking into consideration the requirements of height, weight and chest measurements etc. of police personnel in some of the european countries like united kingdom, the committee made recommendations regarding the minimum height, chest measurements (expanded andunexpanded) and weight, having ..... yadav, learned standing counsel, have raised another objection to the applicability of the 1972 rules to the matter of recruitment of constables and sub-inspectors of police. their submission is that the main part of article 309 of the constitution confers power upon the appropriate legislature to make acts to regulate the recruitment ..... there were 9 other members including sri g. parthasarthi. vice-chancellor, jawaharlal nehru university, new delhi. sri k. f. rustamjt, director general, border security force, sri n,s. saxena. former i.g.p., u. p. and sri m. gopalan, i.g.p.. kerala. dr. a. gupta. director. bureau .....

Democratic Bar Association, Allahabad and Others Vs. High Court of Jud ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2383A; (2000)2UPLBEC1387

R. R. K. Trivedi, J.1. Petitioner No. 1, it is claimed, is an association of advocates and petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, who are the advocates practising in High Court, have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution questioning the legality of Rules dated 4.2.2000 by which Designation of Senior Advocates Rules. 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) have been amended. It has been prayed that amending Rules be declared ultra vires. Inoperative, null and void. It has also been prayed that respondents be restrained from designating 'Senior Advocates' in pursuance of impugned Rules. Second relief sought is that respondent No. 1 be directed to consider the advocates practising in District Courts for being designated as senior advocates. It has also been prayed that recommendations made by the Screening Committee on 6.3.2000 and 30.3.2000 may be quashed.2. Under Rule 9 of Chapter III of the Rules of the Court Hon'ble the Chief Justice called a Full Court meeting to be he...