Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indo tibetan border police force act 1992 chapter i preliminary Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 18 results (0.145 seconds)

Karan Yadav and anr. Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4530

..... of personnel and training) on 10-8-1993 authorising the cbi to investigate the case under section 6 read with section 5(1) of the delhi special police establishment act referred to above. the objection of learned counsel for the petitioner is that this notification has not been expressed in the name of the president. learned ..... section 20 of tada. the inspector general of police did not accord sanction for prosecution. thereafter, an amendment application was moved on behalf of the petitioner by learned counsel in which an amendment was sought in ..... of the petitioner in the aforesaid case crime. it was stated that the state government had sent direction to the director general and the inspector general of police meerut zone directing them not to afford sanction for prosecution under the tada and the designated court under tada released all the persons arrested by the cbi under .....

M/S. Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All135

ORDERV.N. Khare, J.1. Two Judges of this Court having differed in their opinion on the question of competence of State Legislature to enact U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. XXIV of 1964) (in short, the Adhiniyam) have referred the following point of difference to third Judge for opinion:'Whether by virtue of Section 18G of the Industrial (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, the State Legislature stood denuded of power to legislate regulating supply, distribution and price of molasses-a product of sugar industry, and was conse-qeuntly incompetent to enact Sections 7, 8 and 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam 1964 (U.P. Act No. 24 of 1964)?'Hon'ble the Chief Justice instead of referring the matter to the third Judge, constituted this Full Bench to answer the point of difference between the two Judges and that is how the matter has come up before us. It arises in the context of statement made in the Lok Sabha by the Minister of State in the Ministry of ...

Natraj Chhabigrih, Sigra Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All375

..... that section 29-a itself was struck down. subsequently, r.s. joshi v. ajit mills ltd. : [1978]1scr338 . set aside its earlier decision in ashoka marketing ltd. (supra). later in indo international industries v. state of u. p., 1983 uptc 1195 : (1981 tax lr 2902) (all), learned single judge held in view of r.s. joshi's case : [1978]1scr338 (supra .....

Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2367

..... and order, their built and appearance have direct impact on their effectiveness. after taking into consideration the requirements of height, weight and chest measurements etc. of police personnel in some of the european countries like united kingdom, the committee made recommendations regarding the minimum height, chest measurements (expanded andunexpanded) and weight, having ..... yadav, learned standing counsel, have raised another objection to the applicability of the 1972 rules to the matter of recruitment of constables and sub-inspectors of police. their submission is that the main part of article 309 of the constitution confers power upon the appropriate legislature to make acts to regulate the recruitment ..... there were 9 other members including sri g. parthasarthi. vice-chancellor, jawaharlal nehru university, new delhi. sri k. f. rustamjt, director general, border security force, sri n,s. saxena. former i.g.p., u. p. and sri m. gopalan, i.g.p.. kerala. dr. a. gupta. director. bureau .....

Sanjay Goel (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002CriLJ625

..... immediately is attracted and the bar comes into play. such an interpretation is most unwholesome. it will amount to unusual fetters in the investigative powers of the police. it could not be the intention of any law. a harmonious construction is, therefore, need of the hour because the investigating agency clearly has unfettered powers ..... to investigate a case. no courts can interfere with this power of the police at any stage. there are various provision in the code of criminal procedure where the assistance of a court, during investigation, is permitted. where a proclamation ..... 164, cr.p.c. if the courts are precluded, as argued by the learned counsel for the defence from making any such direction the dictum of police having unfettered powers shall be thrown to winds. investigation is nothing but collection of facts and circumstances as evidence. obtaining expert's opinion during investigation on .....

Raisa Begum and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1067

..... cri): 'then sum and substance of the above deliberation result in a conclusion that the investigation of an offence is the field exclusively reserved for the police officers whose powers in that field arc unfettered so long as the power to investigate into the cognizable offences is legitimately exercised in strict compliance with the ..... desired by the informant to be examined by the police and possibly they are proceeding. in the mean while the petitioners have moved this petition for writ of certiorari quashing the said first information report and ..... of sindhuja prasad singh, rajendra prasad verma, it appears that a number of first information reports, if they could be so called were lodged by the police conveying the formation of a group for the purposes of carrying out foregery, impersonation and falsification of documents sometime also relating to courts. the matter was .....

Asha Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2233

..... accused.2. where the allegations in the first information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the f.i.r. do no disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an by police officers under section 156(1) of the code except under an order of a magistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the code.3. where the uncontroverted ..... by learned counsel for the applicant in revision that though the entire allegations made against the applicant in revision are false and have been made in collusion with local police of ghaziabad after a long gap of 15 months as a counter blast to the complaint made by husband of the applicant against in-laws of the deceased that ..... were found in that very house on 21-3-1998. shri rajeev kumar sharma opposite party no.2 elder brother of deceased praveen sharma lodged a written report at police station indrapuram, ghaziabad stating therein that his brother praveen sharma aged about 30 years was serving in c.p.w.d. construction division, new delhi on the post .....

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

..... under:the sum and substance of the above deliberation results in a conclusion that the investigation of an offence is the field exclusively reserved for the police officers whose powers in that field are unfettered so long as the power to investigate into the cognizable offences is legitimately exercised in strict compliance ..... offence, he must either proceed with the investigation or cause an investigation to be proceeded with by his subordinate; that in a case where the police officer sees no sufficient ground for investigation, he can dispense with the investigation altogether; that the field of investigation of any cognizable offence is exclusively ..... demarcated sphere of activity in the field of crime detection and crime punishment. investigation of an offence is the field exclusively for the executive through the police department, superintendence over which vests in the state government. once it investigates and finds an offence having been committed, it is its duty to collect .....

Dr. A.K. Bansal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)73ITD49(All.)

..... of the so called warrant of authorisation was not given and rather the petitioner was made to sign some blank forms in the presence of large police contingent. a photo copy of excessive show of police force may be seen in annexure 25." "1. because the respondent no. 2 had no material of any kind whatsoever which could lead to the formation .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... compensation as their fate despite they being aggrieved and dissatisfied. in some of the writ petitions, allegations have also been made that farmers resorted to agitations which was crushed by police force. it is useful to refer to the pleadings in some of the cases by which the petitioners have given justifications for approaching the court with delay. we have already ..... under the 1997 rules. it is pleaded that when the petitioners did not accept the compensation, they were tortured by the local police and their signatures were forcibly obtained on the agreement. they were also taken away by the police and proceedings under section 107/116 of cr.p.c. were initiated against the petitioners on 13th september, 2007. it is pleaded .....