Individually - Judgment Search Results

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... concerns and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in the performance of ..... specific goals for participation by businesses controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals ibid the small business administration sba has implemented these statutory directives in .....

Vernonia School Dist. 47j Vs. Acton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regime would likely be ineffectual but having misconstrued the fundamental role of the individualized suspicion requirement in fourth amendment analysis the court never seriously engages the ..... s only remaining and most basic categorical protection its strong preference for an individualized suspicion requirement with its accompanying antipathy toward personally intrusive blanket searches of mostly .....

Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1236; JT1995(2)SC110; 1995(1)SCALE539; (1995)2SCC161; [1995]1SCR1036

..... denied that sport is an expression of self in an athletic or individual event the individual expresses himself through his individual feat in a team event such as cricket football hockey etc ..... pluralism diversity of views and range of opinions underlying the said austrian law several individuals and organisations who were refused television radio licences lodged complaints with the european human .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Venu Suresh Sanjay Trust (Cit V. Venu S ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1997)138CTR(Mad)97

..... the deductions provided it can be regarded as an individual the term individual as used in the it act does not mean a ..... assessee the trustee therefore has to be an individual or group of individuals sec 161 provides that every representative assessee as ..... assessee discussed in s 162 are similarly enforceable by the individual though in a representative capacity the status of a representative .....

Minor Prahlad Ugardas Patel Oral Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1995)53TTJ(Ahd.)115

..... not further distribute the income to the beneficiaries so as to reach the ultimate individual beneficiaries those 6 oral discretionary trusts however filed returns through their trustees and paid ..... by themselves oral discretionary trusts and beneficiaries of the subsequently mentioned oral trusts are three individuals as far as third category is concerned it consists one oral specific trust known .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... nature of sovereignty subjecting states to federal jurisdiction in federal question cases brought by individuals thus reflected nothing more than professor amar s apt summary that w here governments ..... the convention was meant to leave the national government without any way to render individuals capable of enforcing their federal rights directly against an intransigent state c the considerations .....

Nishithendu Dhar Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court: Guwahati

..... the rules of the gauhati high court separate applications are to be filed for each individual where interests are not identical thus where interests are identical no separate application is ..... since the second paragraph does not provide for separate application to be filed by several individuals where interests are identical the impugned proviso cannot enlarge the scope of the second paragraph .....

Nebraska Vs. Wyoming

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decree because a mandate of compliance 20 although the claim may well require consideration of individual contracts and compliance with the reclamation and warren acts it does not follow as ..... water disputes among states may be resolved by compact or decree without the participation of individual claimants who nonetheless are bound by the result reached through representation by their respective .....

Plaut Vs. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... may reduce the perception that legislative interference with judicial judgments was prompted by individual favoritism but it is legislative interference with judicial judgments nonetheless not favoritism nor ..... this law its exclusively retroactive effect its application to a limited number of individuals and its reopening of closed judgmentstaken together show that congress here impermissibly tried .....

Babbitt Vs. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... unlawful feature of the regulation is that it encompasses injury inflicted not only upon individual animals but upon populations of the protected species injury in the regulation includes significantly ..... home chapter communities for great ore scalia j dissenting rather than upon fortuitously accountable individual landowners the cost of preserving the habitat of endangered species there is neither .....