Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Individually - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 22 1993

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Modu Timblo (individual)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-22-1993

Reported in: (1994)116CTR(Bom)442; [1994]206ITR647(Bom)

be assessed fully in the hands of Mr. Modu Timblo, individually. 12. As stated above, both the assessee in his status


Jan 16 2003

Subhash Gupta (individual) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on: Jan-16-2003

Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(JP.)692

derives income from export of garments in the status of individual. The return of income was filed on 29th Oct., 1997,


Aug 09 1988

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat-ii, Ahmedabad Vs. Arvind Narottam ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-09-1988

Reported in: AIR1988SC1824; (1988)72CTR(SC)94; [1988]173ITR479(SC); JT1988(3)SC423; 1988(2)SCALE401; (1988)4SCC113a; [1988]Supp2SCR266

as it would be leviable upon and recoverable from an individual who is a citizen of India and resident in India)


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Mar 13 2004

Dy. Cit Vs. Satya Prakash (individual) and (Huf)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2004

Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Del)90

ORDERP.N. Parashar, J.M.:These are five appeals of the revenue and the cross-objections of the assesses pertaining to assessment year 1993-94...


Apr 20 2016

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai and Another Vs. K. Sundaramoorthy ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-20-2016

status and did not choose to file return in his individual status. The assessment was completed under Section 158BC read with


Feb 07 1991

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Vijaipat Singhania (individual) and Vee ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-07-1991

Reported in: [1991]192ITR308(All)

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.1. Under Section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the Tribunal has stated the following questions :'(1)...


Jul 25 1991

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Palace Fund (individual)

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-25-1991

Reported in: [1992]196ITR505(Ker)

hands of the Palace Fund in the status of an individual for the assessment years 1967-68 to 1971-72. In I. T.


Jun 19 1985

Wealth-tax Officer Vs. Niranjan Narottam (individual)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Jun-19-1985

Reported in: (1985)14ITD27(Ahd.)

1. The common issue in all these appeals relates to the valuation of properties. Taking the first and second appeals,...


Aug 17 2006

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.D. Singhania (individual)

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-17-2006

Reported in: (2006)206CTR(All)529; [2006]287ITR19(All)

to the present reference are as follows:4. The assessee, an individual was living in the house owned by him. The Income-tax


Aug 25 1993

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. G.N. Agrawal (individual)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-25-1993

Reported in: [1996]217ITR250(Bom)

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this reference under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial