Indirectly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indirectly Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.017 seconds)Nine Star Exports Rep. by Its Power of Attorney, R. Kayarohanam Vs. Co ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2002
Reported in: 2003(151)ELT265(Mad); (2002)3MLJ565
orderprabha sridevan j 1 all the petitioners have imported fresh garlic which is a restricted category the import has been...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurendra Engineering Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-12-2002
Reported in: (2003)86ITD121(Mum.)
..... exclude such costs incurred for earning export incentives therefore there is no justification for excluding indirect costs if any incurred for earning export incentives the assessee in the present case is ..... the reason that parliament might have assumed that most types of expenditure would directly or indirectly produce taxable income and it is not worth the administrative effort involved to go .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSebi Vs. South East Marine Engineering and
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Sep-09-2002
..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or voting ..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... activities the question why timely steps could not be taken to stop him from indirectly dealing in securities assumes importance the respondent has suspended cancelled certificate of registration ..... the absence of sufficient material evidence to establish that the appellant had directly or indirectly indulged in market manipulation the impugned order holding the appellant guilty of violating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshwIn K. Doshi, Pankaj G. Joshi, Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-25-2002
..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or voting ..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSebi Vs. Fag Bearing India Limited
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-19-2002
..... takeover regulations as the said acquisition does not fulfill the essential conditions applicable to indirect acquisitions as per the recommendations of the committee constituted under the chairmanship of ..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVideocon International Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... 4 no person shall effect take part in or enter into either directly or indirectly transactions in securities with the intention of artificially raising or depressing the prices of ..... in the absence of sufficient material evidence to establish that the appellant had directly or indirectly indulged in market manipulation the impugned order holding the appellant guilty of violating regulation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFlash Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-20-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC1894; [2003]116CompCas577(SC); 2003(85)ECC510; 2003(151)ELT241(SC); (2003)2SCC86; [2002]SUPP5SCR698
..... a person who is so associated with the assessee that they have interest directly or indirectly in the business of each other while dismissing the appeal this court explained the circumstances ..... parle products limited therefore the relationship between the appellant and messrs parle biscuits limited though indirect they have mutual interest in the business of each other the facts and circumstances of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDagger Die Cutting and Nilanjan Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: May-03-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC669
..... business it can be presumed that they have interest directly or indirectly in the business of each other ref section 14 of the ..... is so associated with the assessees that they have interest directly or indirectly in the business of each other and includes a holding company ..... alleged to be a related person must have interest direct or indirect in the business of each other the equality and degree of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSebi Vs. Clariant International Ltd.
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-16-2002
..... the acquirer under the scheme of reconstruction financial reorganization and the resultant acquisition of indirect control of the target company and not undertaken pursuant to the umbrella agreement ..... decisions exercisable by a person or persons acting individually or in concert directly or indirectly including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or voting .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial