Skip to content


Indirectly - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: indirectly Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 259 results (0.015 seconds)
Jun 15 1982 (FN)

Plyler Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-15-1982

plyler v doe 457 u s 202 1982 u s supreme court plyler v doe 457 u s 202 1982...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 22 1982 (HC)

Ramchander Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Oct-22-1982

Reported in: 1982WLN(UC)551

kanta bhatnagar j 1 this appeal is directed against the judgment dated august 31 1976 passed by the additional sessions...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 1982 (SC)

Vijay Kumar Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-17-1982

Reported in: AIR1982SC1023; 1982(1)SCALE240; (1982)2SCC43; [1982]3SCR522; 1982(14)LC223(SC)

..... arts 226 and 32 and if these provisions of the limitation act are brought in indirectly to control the remedies conferred by the constitution it would be a case of parliament ..... indirectly abridging the fundamental rights which this court in golaknath s case 1967 2 s c .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 1982 (SC)

T. Barai Vs. Henry Ah Hoe and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-07-1982

Reported in: AIR1983SC150; 1983CriLJ164; 1983(1)Crimes890(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1133; (1983)1SCC177; [1983]1SCR905

a p sen j 1 this appeal by special leave from a judgment of the calcutta high court dated june...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 28 1982 (SC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-28-1982

Reported in: AIR1982SC1249; 1982CriLJ1581; 1983(1)Crimes335(SC); 1982(1)SCALE545; (1982)2SCC463; [1983]1SCR8

..... avoid any of the provisions of the act rules or directions the words directly or indirectly do not take in any agreement to be illegal acts in future 769 h 770 ..... of law that what cannot be done directly should not be permitted to be done indirectly 784 a b i from the facts and circumstances of the case it was clear .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1982 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Vs. Radha Kishan Vij and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-01-1982

Reported in: 1983CriLJ48; 1983(2)Crimes935; 23(1983)DLT27; ILR1982Delhi991

order1 the main question raised upon this revision is a pure question of law and depends upon the true construction...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 1982 (SC)

Ram Pyare Chaudhary and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-11-1982

Reported in: AIR1982SC831; [1983]53CompCas14(SC); 1982(1)SCALE411; (1982)1SCC671; [1982]3SCR207; 1982(14)LC282(SC)

..... of market value it is not possible to find compensation in advantages which might accrue indirectly 164 b c rule 444 provides that the counting of votes will take place immediately .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1982 (HC)

Krishna and Company Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-16-1982

Reported in: [1983]54STC263(Kar)

..... case article 57 would apply further article 57 pre supposes the plaintiff is directly or indirectly admitting the factum of adoption and a cloud is sought to be created on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 1982 (FN)

Jewett Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-23-1982

..... senate footnote 9 and house footnote 10 reports explain the terms property transfer gift and indirectly are used in the broadest and most comprehensive sense the term property reaching every ..... conceptual or contingent our expansive reading of the statutory language in smith unquestionably encompasses an indirect transfer effected by means of a disclaimer of a contingent future interest in a trust .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 1982 (FN)

Blue Shield of Virginia Vs. Mccready

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-21-1982

..... the court found unacceptable the risk of duplicative recovery engendered by allowing both direct and indirect purchasers to claim damages resulting from a single overcharge by the antitrust defendant illinois brick ..... been borne in the first instance by the competitors of the conspirators and inevitably though indirectly by the customers of the competitors in the form of suppressed competition in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //