Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: madhya pradesh Page 12 of about 867 results (0.122 seconds)

Hajra Bai and ors. Vs. Jadavbai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986MP106

..... 1279 (ladli parshad jaiswal v. karnal distillery co. ltd); air 1952 nagpur 84 (pannalal v. kisanlal) and air 1963 madh pra 37 (firm gopal company ltd., bhopal v. firm hazarilal company, bhopal) which have all taken a view that in absence of material particulars a party cannot succeed and allowed to lead evidence thereon nor any decree in ..... the will of the other. nothing in this sub-section shall affect the provisions of section 111 of the indian evidence act, 1872.' section 17 defines 'fraud', which is as follows : '17. 'fraud' means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance, or by his agent, with intent to ..... the plaintiff has restricted her case to the case of fraud alone though sometimes in certain cases they may overlap to some extent. 21. section 16 of the contract act defines 'undue influence', which is as under : '16,(1) a contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties .....

Union Carbide Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1988MP206; 1988MPLJ435

..... uoi. the appeals court held that in the absence of agreement, the parties will be limited by the applicable discovery rules of the indian court in which the claims will be pending. further appeals were filed by the individual claimants and the uoi in the u.s ..... individual claimants before the u.s. court of appeals, the ucc's appeal being on the limited question of satisfying the judgment of indian court and discovery. on 5-9-1986, the uoi filed the present claim case before the district judge, bhopal, on behalf of ..... all the claimants as parens patriae under the said act. the ucc entered appearance in the case on 30-10-1986. the court of appeals in u.s.a. allowed the appeal of ..... feb. 1985. on 20-2-1985, the parliament enacted the bhopal gas leak disaster (processing of claims) act, 1985, and on 8-4-1985, uoi pursuant to the act, filed a claim for recovery of damages against the ucc in the u.s.a. in the meanwhile, .....

Purushottam Vijay Vs. the State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP205; 1961CriLJ114

..... is under exceptions 2 and 3 and not exception 9.15. the law regarding the defence of fair comment is well established and the parties have referred to english and indian decisions. the fact that the accused is a journalist gives him no more, and, certainly, no less freedon of opinion, that is available to any other citizen. ..... disposal of, the present appeal.3. the authorship of the article having been admitted, the question is whether the defence ot exceptions ii and iii to section 499, indian penal code has been established by satisfaction of the tests of the substantial correctness of the facts, the fairness and restraint of the comments, the absence of private malice, ..... g. p. was per se defamatory of shri narsinghrao dixit, but, in my opinion, the act of the appellant falls within tho ambit of 'fair comments' and is thus saved by tho second and third exception to section 499 of the indian penal code. the statement of facts and expression of opinion relating to shri sahai by the appellant .....

Shrikant and anr. Vs. Praveen

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT385

..... 912 : 2007(5) m.p.h.t. 431 (sc), wherein hon'ble apex court has held that 'with a view to make a director of a company vicariously liable for the acts of the company, it is obligatory on the part of the complainant to make specific allegations as are required in law'. further reliance was placed on a decision in the ..... payment of cheque amount. it is submitted that partnership firm is governed as per provisions of section 25 of the indian partnership act, according to which every partner is jointly liable with all the other partners and also severally for all acts of the firm while he is a partner. it is submitted that for making out a prima facie case, sufficient ..... complaint that each of the members are having equal share in the said partnership firm.11. section 25 of the indian partnership act, 1932 lays down that every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the firm done while he is a partner. this relates to civil law. so far as law laid .....

Vishal Pharmaceuticals and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ378

..... analysis the result of the test or analysis together with full protocols of the tests applied, shall be supplied forthwith to the sender in form 2.indian pharmacopia and pharmacopia of britain have indicated different tests for the purpose of analysis of the drugs which are likely to be sent to the laboratory of ..... evidence on record held that the petitioners were guilty of committing an offence punishable under the provisions of the act for which they are prosecuted. the petitioners preferred an appeal in the sessions court dhar against the said order of conviction and sentence challenging its correctness, ..... were prosecuted in the court of cjm dhar for an offence punishable under the provisions of section 18(a)(i) read with section 27(d) of the act.4. the prosecution examined necessary witnesses to establish the guilt of the petitioners. petitioners also examined some witnesses in defence. the learned magistrate after appreciating the .....

Pooran Singh Pallaiya Vs. Lok Ayukta and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2007MP247; 2007(1)MPLJ256

..... court that there is a distinction between a corporation established by or under an act and a body incorporated under an act. a company incorporated under the companies act is not created by the companies act but comes into existence in accordance with the provisions of the act. there is thus a well-marked distinction between a body which, after coming ..... he placed reliance on the decision in the case of ramesh balkrishna kulkarni v. state of maharashtra : 1986crilj14 on the question that under section 21, ipc municipal councillors and mla are not public servant and heavily placed reliance on the constitution bench decision of the apex court in the case of mohinder singh ..... university of allahabad v. amrit chand tripathi air 1987 sc 57 on the question of harmonious construction of provisions of the act. shri kelkar further submitted that under section 21 of the ipc under the definition of 'public servant' mayor, councilors and mlas are not the public servant and the scope of enquiry .....

Sarvajanik Jan Kalyan Parmarthik Nyas Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008MP86; 2008(1)MPLJ537

..... is unwilling that it shall be registered, or that want or failure of consideration or denial or execution with free consent (as defined in section 14 of the indian contract act, 1872, is pleaded by the executant of the document, although he admits execution, or that the document deals with property not belonging to the person by whom ..... and the document cannot be registered during the pendency of such a title dispute. duties and powers of registering officers are contained in part xi of the registration act. none of the provisions empowers the registering officers to refuse to register a document in case of dispute of title. cumulative effect of the provisions contained in parts ..... refusal has not been passed at all. further, contention of shri dubey, learned dy. advocate general that the suit could have been filed under section 77 of the act is also without any force because no right to sue accrued in favour of the petitioner on the grounds enumerated thereunder.8. shri p.n. dubey, learned dy .....

Cit Vs. Eicher Motors Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(MP)629; [2007]293ITR464(MP)

..... k. c. p. ltd. : [2000]242itr659(sc) the court was dealing a situation where the assessee was promoted by two companies, viz., m/s. eimco corporation usa and m/s. kcp ltd., an indian company. promoter companies agreed to pay initially certain sum of money towards their contribution. the foreign collaborator contributed technical know-how consisting of right and licence ..... whether the tribunal has jurisdictionto examine the same ?16. answering the question in the affirmative, it was held (page 386) :16under section 254 of the income tax act, the appellate tribunal may, after giving both the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit. the power of ..... kind of case which their authors almost certainly did have in mind?in seeking to treat expressions of judicial opinion as if they were words in an act of parliament. moreover a further source of difficulty has been a tendency in some cases to treat some one criterion as paramount and to press it to .....

Smt. Panbai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... that both the detenus were not only enlarged on bail but have also been acquitted of the charge of the offence under section 307 read with 34 of the ipc, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that their detention is arbitrary, illegal and malafide. to buttress the argument, reference has been made to the decisions of ..... threaten the witnesses and tamper with the evidence. (iii) by committing criminal acts as described therein, they have created a general sense of insecurity in the public mind and have, thus, disturbed the public order.4. in ram manohar lohia v. ..... a bare perusal of the detention orders would reveal that the district magistrate had proceeded to exercise the power conferred by sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act on the following grounds - (i) both the detenus were having criminal antecedents. (ii) having secured release on bail in all the pending cases, they were able to .....

Chandra Shekhar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... national hydel power development corporation as also the public undertaking or autonomous bodies of the state government, like madhya pradesh state electricity board or its successor companies or equivalent organizations. this makes it clear that earlier in the rules such officers of the undertaking or autonomous bodies were not included otherwise there was ..... other allowances as are admissible to high court judge. the members shall be entitled to city compensatory allowance as is admissible to the officers of indian administrative service of the corresponding grade in the state.6. the proviso of the rules is restricted to the central government or state government officers ..... notification not f3-20/1998/xiii in the exercise of powers conferred by section 180 read with sub section (2) of section 89 of the electricty act, 2003 (no.36 of 2003), the state government, hereby makes the following further amendments in the madhya pradesh electricity regulatory commission (salary, allowances and .....