Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 867 results (0.083 seconds)

Mar 23 2000 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Satish Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ1568; AIR2001MP41

..... . to this extent, the indian statute therefore differs from the english statute. under section 13 of the railways act, 1890 no such duties are imposed directly on the railway administration by the statute. the section on the other hand only confers a power on the central government to issue a requisition to the railway administration i.e. the general managers or the railway companies (if any) to ..... what can be the effect of an omission to exercise this statutory power to issue a requisition, will be dealt with separately under point no. 4). section 13 of the indian railways act may be noticed : '13. fences, screens, gates and bars.--the central government may require that with a time to be specified in the requisition or within such further time as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1957 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Asharfi Devi and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1957MP114

..... which the forwarding or receiving station is situated; otherwise the railway company will be freed from responsibility.'under this paragraph, authority is virtually given to the general traffic manager, bombay (now the chief traffic manager) to receive notice of claims under section 77 of the indian railways act. on a similar provision, in g. g. in council ..... would appear from the evidence of the vinayak katikar (d. w. 1), who is district commercial claims inspector, that claims under section 77 of the indian railways act are passed on by the general manager to the superintendent of claims who has his office in the same building. due authority of this officer to ..... and cannot, therefore, be accepted.11. this brings us to the question whether the notices addressed to the general traffic manager satisfy the requirements of the indian railways act, there is no doubt that there was no officer called general traffic manager at that time. this however, cannot vitiate the notices, for, that must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1962 (HC)

Prabhakar Parashuramji Pandit Vs. Vikram Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1963MP120; 1962MPLJ319

..... case had in view.12. it thus seems to be fairly agreed on authorities that except where specific rules framed under indian companies act indicate a contrary procedure, the procedure provided under the civil procedure code for the trial of a suit would apply to a proceeding under section 235 of that ..... the provision as to the applicability of the indian limitation act, 1903 to an application under section 235 of the companies act is repealed, we cannot apply even article 176.4. section 235 (3) of the indian companies act, 1913 as it stood prior to amendment is as follows -'the indian limitation act, 1908, shall apply to an application under ..... raja kakarlapudi sudarsana sundara nara-sayamma submitted an application on 20-12-1954 under section 235 of the indian companies act, 1913, alleging certain acts of misfeasance, breach of trust and misapplication of the funds of the company by its directors during the period of their management. this creditor after the submission of the application died .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1976 (HC)

Virendrasingh Bhandari and ors. Vs. Nandlal Bhandari and Sons P. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas532(MP)

..... be wound up by the court if the court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up. section 222(f) of the english companies act, 1948, is in terms identical with the indian counterpart, section 433(f). it is now well established that the sixth clause, namely, 'just and equitable', is ..... equitable clause there was to be construed ejusdem generis in the light of the earlier clauses or not. the provision there was the same as section 433 of the companies act, 1956. while holding that the just and equitable clause could not be construed ejusdem generis with regard to the earlier five sub-sections of the section, their lordships ..... 44(g) of the indian partnership act also contains the words 'just and equitable '.section 433(f) under which this application has been made has to be read with section 443(2) of the act. under the latter provision where the petition is presented on the ground that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1979 (HC)

Kishore Gupta Vs. Municipal Corporation, Indore and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1980MP79

..... similar. in that decision the petitioners who were vending various articles on the platform at madurai junction under permission granted by the south indian railway company ltd., were stopped from vending as the railway was taken over by the government and the government wanted to introduce a new policy about vending on the platforms. and it is ..... it was also contended in one of the petitions that the corporation is not in existence and an administrator is continuing and in the scheme of the act the administrator could not continue ad infinitum and thus the administrator has no jurisdiction to function on behalf of the corporation. 5. learned counsel appearing for ..... 4. it was also contended that any tax on advertisements could only be levied by the corporation in accordance with section 132 of the madhya pradesh act and after following the procedure prescribed under that section and the following sections. that has not been done and therefore the administrator could not by an administrative .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1957 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Shantilal Nanchand Jain

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1957MP192

..... which any person would have dealt with his own goods in similar circumstances. the amount of care enjoined on the railway administration under section 72 of the indian railways act, 1890, read with, section 151 of the indian contract act, 1782, was not, therefore, taken. this inference is not affected by the fact that an assistant station ..... a divergence of judicial opinion on the question whether this rule, so jar as it exempts the railway from liability, is valid.6. in the case of a railway administered by the government, section 47 of the indian railways act empowers an officer to be appointed by the central government in this behalf to make general rules ..... liability, therefore, depends upon the general law.7. in england the liability of a railway as a carrier ceases after the termination of transit and thereafter it retains the merchandise as a warehouseman at common law; accordingly the company holds the merchandise subject to usual charges but with the exceptions prescribed in s.r.o. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2001 (HC)

Madhya Pradesh Cement Manufacturers' Association Vs. State of Madhya P ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002MP62; 2002(1)MPHT84; 2002(2)MPLJ195

..... energy produced by :(i) the government of india for consumption by that government;(ii) the government of india or a railway company for consumption in the construction maintenance or operation of any railway administered by the government of india;(iii) the state government of consumption by the government;(iv) a rural electric co ..... list iii, seventh schedule to the constitution of india has been utilised by the parliament for enacting indian electricity act, 1910 and electricity (supply) act, 1948 covering the entire field relating to electricity, therefore, the impugned act could not have been enacted to cover the same field namely electrical development in view of law ..... the constitution of india, so article 254 is violated, there being already two central legislations on the subject, namely, the indian electricity act, 1910 and electricity (supply) act, 1948. therefore, the act is liable to be declared ultra vires unless gamut of article 255 is crossed. we have found that the ordinance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2005 (HC)

Orient Paper Mills Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR255]; (2006)ILLJ1136MP; 2006(1)MPLJ209

..... the company and after unloading the bamboos from the truck, they are free to perform their business of transportation. it is also not fixed that a particular truck of a particular transporter is engaged to bring the bamboos.6. according to the petitioner, the railways are public utility services, provided by the union of india and are regulated by the provisions of indian railways act ..... . the employees of the indian railways are also government servants and there are separate rules and regulations governing their terms and conditions of their employment. they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2013 (HC)

Burn Standard Company Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... 2004 was filed before the high court. 6 (9) in the meantime, the indian railway established its central western zone at jabalpur. a demand of land was made by the railways. the petitioner company was intending to transfer the land to the railway. all these facts were brought to the notice of the high court in w. ..... year 1973. an ordinance was issued on 23.06.1976 known as the burn company and indian standard wagon company (nationalization) ordinance, 1976. thereafter an act was enacted by the parliament known as the burn company and indian standard wagon company (nationalization) act 1976. both the companies were nationalized and became as state w.e.f.01.04.1975. (6) ..... . (2) the petitioner is a government of india undertaking and is a subsidiary of bharat bhari udyog nigam limited. the petitioner is also registered as a company under the companies act, 1956, having registered office at 22-b, raja santosh road, kolkata. (3) the petitioner has challenged order annexure p-6 dated 21.04.2005, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1972 (HC)

Ravishankar Dube and ors. Vs. Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh, Gwalio ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1973MP52; 1972MPLJ149

..... be at liberty to put conditions of this kind qua the steam-boat, and not be able to put conditions qua the railway. the consequence would be that if a passenger started and delivered his luggage to the railway company, and then arrived at the end of the journey and the luggage was not forthcoming, and nobody knew where it was ..... box was carelessly dropped by the defendants' servants into the harbour at folkestone, and was with its contents of course much damaged. section 7 of the railway and canal traffic act enacted:-- 'every such company shall be liable for the loss of or injury done to any horses, cattle or other animals, or to any articles, goods or things, in ..... where there is no absurdity or inconvenience in treating a part of a section as not divorced from or independent of its earlier part. 14. so far as our (indian) enactments are concerned, i can clearly see that where a section is composed of several parts, they together constitute an integral whole. a section is sub-divided into .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //