Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway companies act 1895 Court: madhya pradesh Page 10 of about 867 results (0.078 seconds)

Har Sharan Lal Vs. Surajmal Kundanmal Oswal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959MP426

..... equitable principle of consolidation recognised by the english law, and the others refusing to apply it, in view of the absence of express statutory provision in the indian transfer of property act. now ihat it has come in the statute all the older rulings are of no application. the points to note are (i) firstly, that this section ..... not having pleaded in the trial court or in the memorandum of first appeal that the plaintiff-mortgagee was barred under section 67a indian transfer of property act (section 74 of the gwalior transfer of property act) from bringing the present suit, it was open to the mortgagor-defendant to raise it during arguments in the first appellate court ..... the two causes of action. i would certainly make allowance for the inartistic drafting of the deed though in 1948 gwalior state had a separate transfer of property act of its own and there was the usual paraphernalia of registrar's office and the like.even so, the intention of the parties should be ascertained. a very .....

Tehsildar Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002CriLJ165; 2001(3)MPHT161

..... accused was formally arrested on 18-6-2000, as he was already in custody in another case registered for the offence under sections 399,400,402, ipc and sections 25/21 of the arms act read with sections 11/13 of the m.p. daketi adhiniyam.9. as stated by the counsel for the parties and noted above, the fir ..... to the primary health center, porsa. it is stated that during treatment, complainant died and therefore the offence which was initially registered under section 307/34, ipc was converted intosection 302 of ipc. the dying-declaration of complainant was also recorded. the fir and dying-declaration recorded indicated that it was raniraj s/o bhagwansingh, tikamsingh s/o bhagwansingh and ..... additional sessions judge, morena in sessions trial no. 256/2000, whereby the applicant/accused has been charged for the offence under section 302 of ipc read with sections 27 and 25(1)(b) of the arms act.3. the fads leading to filing this case are as under : the incident had occurred on 18-4-2000 at 8/8.30 .....

Nathu Singh and anr. Vs. State of M.P. Through P.S. Porsa

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ770

..... had spoken 'ab dekhta kya hai, goli maar do'. considering the aforesaid evidence corroborated by the medical evidence, trial court convicted the appellants under section 302/34 ipc and sentenced them as above. 6. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the question in this appeal is whether the appellants are the main assailants. admittedly ..... 8 and 1/2 hears. though the appellant balwan singh is the brother of gudde alias jagmohan singh, who is still absconding, but certainly for the overt act of gudde alias jagmohan, appellant balwan singh can not be convicted as he is the brother of the main assailant gudde alias jagmohan. under the aforesaid circumstances, ..... singh v. mukhtiar singh : air1995sc241 it was held that there was only incriminating evidence against accused that he gave 'lalkara' and in the absence of any over act the benefit of doubt was given to the accused persons and upheld by the supreme court. 15. considering the aforesaid principle of law, in the case in hand .....

Umed Chand Golcha Vs. Dayaram and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ966

..... of the deceased by tortfeasors. it is found that in its applicability, the principle has been modified significantly by the provision of section 306 of the indian succession act reading of which demonstrates that cause of action survives to the legal representatives including one relating to the loss to the estate but not for defending assault ..... excessive. the contract of insurance was not with satya narayan sharma. instead, it was with devendra singh, the original owner of the vehicle, and the insurance company had not been intimated about the transfer of the vehicle, therefore, the policy issued in favour of devendra singh stood lapsed and the contract of insurance ceased to ..... as defined in the indian penal code, or other personal injuries not causing the death of the party; and except also causes where, after the death of the party, the relief sought could not be enjoyed or granting it would be nugatory. illustrations(i) a collision takes place on a railway in consequence of some .....

Essar Steels Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1995LC21(MP); 1996(83)ELT38(MP)

..... under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india.2. briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner is a firm registered under the indian partnership act. the petitioner firm has set-up a factory at mandsaur to manufacture twisted bars. the products of the petitioner are subject to central excise duty under the ..... not proper to examine the merits of the matter or to adjudicate upon the question which is required to be answered by the appellate authority constituted under the relevant act.10. in the result, this petition is dismissed as incompetent leaving the petitioner free to pursue the appeal presented by it and obtain adjudication of the issue, ..... i) demanding duty of rs. 1,09,761/- under rule 9(2) of the central excise rules, 1944 read with proviso to section 11a of central excises and salt act, 1944 and also imposed penalty of rs. 20,000/-. the petitioner felt that it is entitled to exemption under notification no. 202/88. dubbing the aforesaid order (annexure .....

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. P.B. Menon and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004MP117; 2004(1)MPLJ285

..... , it does not bind the parties. neither the registrar nor the vendor is bound by it. the apex court held that at page 2855; of air scw:--'the indian stamp act, 1899 provides the power to prescribe stamp duty on instruments, etc. entry 44 of list iii. concurrent list of the seventh schedule read with article 254 of the ..... the comparable sales of the ad- joining areas and has erred in making the valuation on the basis of index maintained for the entire civil lines area and near railway station, jabalpur area. the board of revenue has referred the sale deed dated 15th june, 1999 executed by m.p. housing board for the land situated in front ..... are completely damaged, the house is situated in sublane, in a residential area, there are no means conveyance available and the house is three kms. away from the railway station and six kms. away from bus stand, the spot inspection report of collector of stamps has been taken into consideration in which the existing condition of the construction .....

Ramdeen Jat Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... ) of the special act then, in alternate, no offence is made out against him according to the provisions of any other act or ipc.10. ramgopal (p.w.1) has stated that he was balai by caste and caste certificate, ex.p/4 ..... and therefore, if rule 7 was flouted then, the entire investigation is vitiated and conviction for the offence punishable under the special act cannot be maintained but, the accused can be convicted for other offences including the ipc offences. in the present case, if the appellant cannot be convicted for the offence punishable under section 3 (1) (x ..... after considering the evidence adduced by the parties, acquitted the appellant from the charges of offence punishable under section 506 of ipc but, convicted him for the offence punishable under section 3 (1) (x) of the special act and sentenced him as mentioned above.5. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties.6. the learned counsel .....

Rakesh Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... respondent no.2/accused. this revision has been filed by applicant/complainant under section 53 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 against the order dated 12.3.2010 passed by special judge (electricity act) bhopal in criminal appeal no.101/2010, whereby the order dated 22.1.2010 passed by principal judge, juvenile justice board, bhopal was ..... affirmed in the regular trial no.161/2008. the respondent no.2 is being prosecuted for an offence under sections 307 and 302 of the indian penal code. charge sheet against him .....

Ramendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... not produced inspite of repeated opportunities being granted. 09. no application has been made for permission to produce the secondary evidence, which is required under section 65 of the indian evidence act, 1872, which reads as follows :- 65. cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given. - secondary evidence may be given of the existence, ..... any knowledge of the purpose for which the vehicle has been used. shri a. k. jain, learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner relied upon section 52 (5) of the indian forest act, 1927, which reads as follows :- 5. (5) - no order of confiscation under sub-section (3) of any tools, vehicles, boats, ropes, chains or any other ..... well as dumpers bearing registration not mp26-d/3150 and mp23-d/5004 under section 26 (1), 30 and 33 of the indian forest act, 1927 read with section 2 (2) of the forest 2 conservation act, 1980. 03. the undisputed facts are that the petitioner's machines were seized by the forest officer on 24.11.2001 .....

Kusumchand Sharadchand and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(MP)385a; [2006]286ITR370(MP); 2006(2)MPLJ18

..... oct., 1975. prior to that there was no provision for making other persons responsible regarding the offence committed by the company by the acts of the firm in contravention with the provisions of the act. after insertion of section 278 in the act every person who, at the time of the commission of the offence, was in charge and was responsible to the ..... be deemed guilty of the offence committed by firm who, at the time the offence was committed, were in charge and were responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company meaning thereby that sleeping partners and those persons who were not taking any part in the day-to-day business of the firm were excluded ..... barred by limitation, by the cit vide ex. p-11 and p-12.3. thereafter, a private complainant under sections 276c and 277 of the act and section 420 read with section 511 of the ipc was filed against the firm, the applicant no. 1 and its three partners including appellant no. 2 by ito before the learned addl. chief .....