Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Page 4 of about 259,015 results (0.894 seconds)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Satna Stone and Lime Co. Ltd., Satna ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2000MP101

..... on the basis of the above provision in the code for the engineering department, learned counsel has submitted that the power is referable to section 29(2) of the indian railway act, 1890, which was in force at the relevant time, and since the rate for maintenance charges is uniformly applied on the cost of the siding worked out in ..... of law in holding that the percentage of maintenance charges could not have been revised as the same was not referable to the power under section 29 of the indian railways act, 1890 and that only the amount as per clause 10 of the agreement could have been claimed. learned counsel for the respondent company has submitted that the ..... u.p. state electricity board, that in order to set aside an award, there must be a wrong proposition of law laid down in the award as the basis of the award. in the present case, tlie learned arbitrator has proceeded to negative the plea of the railway about applicability of section 29(2) of the indian railway act, 1890, and as .....

Shri P. Lakshmana Babu Vs. Union of India Represented by the General M ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

..... wife was working in the state government and employed in hyderabad, the respondents have transferred the applicant to the present post at hyderabad on the basis of railway board's instructions applicable to such cases. the applicant is presently working as office superintendent grade-ii in the office of the senior section engineer (candw), ..... be posted as cc/ccc/prc/cprc. as per para 12.13.1 of annexure-iii of chapter-5 titled medical examination and medical decategorisation of the indian railway medical manual, it is unambiguously stated that the categories for which hearing aid is not permissible should be borne in mind . the very nature of ..... of right and full participation) act, 1995 and it is within the competency of the screening committee to consider the candidature of the applicant for offering alternate appointment which recommended to appoint the applicant to the ministerial cadre. thus, the respondents are not correct in ordering that in terms of railway board's letter dated 29.4. .....

Fancy Babu Vs. Union of India, Represented by General Manager and Othe ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

..... and production units. copy of board's letters dated 29th april 1999, 31st july 2001 and 1st july 2003 have been circulated as pbc's no.76/99 ..... act, 1995- absorption of disabled/medically decategorised staff in alternative employment- date of effect of the revised scheme-question regarding p.b.circular no.84/2005 rbe no.93/2005 copy of board's letter no.e(ng)-ii/204/re-3/9 dated 31st may 2005, from director,estt.,(n), railway board, new delhi addressed to the general manager, all indian railways ..... dated 9th june 1999, 132/01 dated 17th august 2001 and dated 17th 2003 respectively. the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, .....

In Re: Chitrala Bheemanna and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1919)37MLJ656

..... is also found by the lower court that the station master did depute the signaller to collect tickets. rule 244 of the general rules made by the railway board acting under the indian railway board act (no. iv of 1905) says ' the station master shall be responsible for the efficient discharge of the duties devolving upon the several members of the ..... staff employed and such staff shall be subject to his authority and directions in the working of the station.' rule 229 says 'every railway servant must promptly obey all ..... convicted by the giddalur sub-magistrate, the first two, of the offences under section 121 and the third of the offence under section 120(b) of the indian railways act (ix of 1890).2. the petition is not pressed as regards the third accused except in the matter of sentence (a fine of rs. 25 has been .....

Ravi Kumar Arora Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT126; 2004(3)SLJ486(Delhi)

..... a visually impaired candidate during this period of time. in fact for the year 2001, six posts had been identified under the said act - two each for the indian information services group 'a'; indian post and telegraph, accounts and finance services group 'a'; and armed forces headquarters, civil services group 'b', but even these were ..... editorinformation officer - pb, bo, a, old and assistant information officer - pb, bo, a, old news editor - pd, bla, ol, oa, pbministry of railwaysindian railway personnel servicepersonnel officerpersonnel officers - ol, bl, oa, b, pbin view of the fact that as per section 32 a number of posts are to be filled through civil ..... even went through the interview, but was not successful. at the time of the interview, the petitioner also underwent a medical examination conducted by the medical board constituted by the upsc, but was never informed that he suffered from any physical handicapped of low vision. the petitioner was, however, successful in the next .....

Ranjit Prasad Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... provisions made by or under any law for the time being force ;(b) (i) railway servant as defined in section 3 of the indian rail ways act. 189o ;(ii) persons holding posts in the railway board who are subject to the railway services (classification, control and appeal) rules ; and(iii) other persons holding posts ..... under the administrative control of the railway board or of the financial commissioner of railways ;(c) persons in respect of ..... conditions of the judiciary and that of the administrative executive was an historical accident. the erstwhile rulers constituted, only one service, viz., the indian civil service for recruiting candidates for the judicial as well as the adminsitrative service and it is from among the successful candidates in the examination .....

Calcutta Shipping Bureau and ors. Vs. Calcutta Port Trust and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1986Cal288

..... mercantile marina department, customs department, the government state in which the port is situated, the defence service, the indian railways and such other interest as in the opinion of the central government ought to be represented on the board.7. section 3 further provides, that before appointing any person under the head labour employed in port, the ..... any, comprised of persons employed in the port and registered under the indian trade unions act, 1926 and the number of persons so appointed shall not be less than two.8. section 5 of the act of 1963 provides that every board constituted under the act shall be a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal with ..... to the rival contentions, a brief reference to the facts, is needed for proper appreciation of the contentions raised in the petition. the petitioner no. 1 acts as a clearing and forwarding agent at the port of calcutta in pursuance of a licence granted by the commissioners for the port of calcutta. in the usual .....

Dina Nath Malhotra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi92; 2003(67)DRJ543

..... an appeal. the national commission held that there was no limitation for making the demand by way of a supplementary bill. it held that section 24 of the indian electricity act gives power to the board to issue such demand and to discontinue the supply to a consumer, who neglects to pay the charges. petitioner contended before the supreme court that under section ..... (u. p.) v. union of india, : air1975delhi248 . 8. respondents on the other hand, have relied on swastic industries v. maharashtra state electricity board, reported at : [1997]1scr532 . 9. it would be worthwhile to reproduce section 12 of indian post office act as also rules 46, 49 and 50. '12. recovery of postage and other sums due in respect of postal articles:--if any .....

Kunwar Trivikram NaraIn Singh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P., Lu ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1960All264; [1961]41ITR150(All)

..... received under this letter by babu har narain singh and his successors was agricultural income exempt from income-tax or income liable to tax under the indian income-tax act. the tribunal finally held that this income being received by babu har narain singh and his successors was not agricultural income and was consequently liable to ..... from year to year in accordance with the net collections of revenue each year. the copies of the orders of the agricultural income-tax commissioner and the board of agricultural income-tax, however, show that the amount which has been received by the successors of babu har narain singh under this settlement has varied ..... paragraph that really needs interpretation by us, and is consequently reproduced below:'3. the settlement of the pargana connected with 1241 f from which time the board proposes that the muqarraridar should get one-fourth of the net collections after deducting from the whale gross-collections the cost of tahsil establishment which will give .....

Sheoduttrai Bholanath Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bihar and OrissA ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1964]52ITR121(Orissa)

..... . thus the two clauses of rule 2 fixed two different periods of limitation for applying under section 26a according as whether the firm is registered under the indian partnership act or not. but both the clauses require that the firm must be constituted under an instrument of partnership. the income-tax officer held that the reconstituted firm ..... dissolution of the old firm, but a mere reconstitution of the same.the question which arises for consideration now is, where an old firm registered under the indian partnership act was reconstituted and notice of such reconstitution was given to the registrar of firms under section 63(1) on october 14, 1957, that firm can be held ..... to be 'a firm registered under the indian partnership act, 1932' on the date of the application under section 26a, namely, october 18, 1957, even though the actual order of the registrar under section 63(1) .....