Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian railway board act 1905 section 4 repealed Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 1 of about 324 results (0.130 seconds)

Central Secretariat Service and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ235CAT

..... the statute required payment of licence fee for premises where licenced shop is located. holding rule 8(1) of karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as ultra vires the act-karnataka excise act, 1965, section 23 (d, it was observed that: rule 8(1) has obviously gone beyond the enabling provision.. it may be ..... the relief is sought, and in whose absence no effective decision can be rendered by the court. in the present case, the relief is claimed only against the railway which has been impleaded through its representative. no list or order fixing seniority of the petitioners vis-a-vis particular individuals, pursuant to the impugned decisions, is being ..... the employees who were likely to be affected as a result of the re-adjustment of the petitioner's seniority in accordance with the principles laid down in the board's decision of october 16, 1952, were, at the most, proper parties and not necessary parties, and their non-joinder could not be fatal to the writ .....

Dr. Indira Saranath Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)1STJ194NULL

..... the officers, including that of the applicant, was taken into account.23. the official respondents have further stated that there are 9 organized group 'a' services in the indian railways, namely: 24. in addition to the above, there are a large number of other services/departments like security, legal, printing and stationery, chemist and metallurgist (cmt), public ..... for promotion to hag (rs. 22,400-24,500), comprises of members as laid down in resolution dated 28.03.2000, i.e. chairman/railway board, secretary/dopt and one member of railway board. in the case of promotion to hag of irms, the third member is member (staff). the resolution dated 28.03.2000 has been framed and ..... only violated resolution dated 28.03.2000 by downgrading the post of cmd (hag) and appointing 6 persons to the post of cmd (sag) but have also acted in contravention of the interim order of this tribunal dated 29.01.2007, which is not sustainable. they have not established expediency in public interest or consulted .....

Shri Rohit Gupta S/O Shri Gian Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through (the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... on administrative side for appropriate action with the following reference: i) whether paragraphs 704 and 705 of the irvm issued by the railway board are statutory rules within the purview of rule 157 of the indian railway establishment code, volume-i and to be deemed as the rules framed by the president of india under proviso to article 309 ..... enquiry had disallowed questions pertaining to the past depositions of the decoy had acted as a prosecutor, which is contrary to the rule of the enquiry defined in rbe no. 89/2001.5. learned counsel would further contend that as per the instructions of railway board dated 5.12.1985 it is mandatory not only upon the da ..... discipline and appeal) rules, 1968, for allegedly charging excess amount of rs. 50/- from decoy passenger, mixing up his private cash with the government cash, acting with malafide intention to earn illegal money, showing artificial shortage and for shortage of rs. 72/- in government cash.during the course of enquiry, on examination .....

Hukam Chand Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Railway, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... has already been considered and case closed. in view of the above, you are hereby informed that your mercy petition cannot be forwarded to the northern railway headquarters office or the railway board. meaning thereby that his case was finally closed by the respondents in the year 2000 itself. it seems applicant is in the habit of filing petition ..... from exercising his right of submitting a petition to the president in accordance with the instructions contained in appendix ii to the indian railway establishment code, volume i (1985). the government servants who are office-bearers of the staff associations are subject to the provisions of the conduct and ..... disciplinary rules like all other government servants. however, if a government servant feels that he is being penalised for any act done by him which is directly or indirectly connected with his position as an officer-bearer of an association, he can prefer an appeal against such action directly .....

Smt. Rashmi JaIn W/O Shri Pravesh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... malafide would not be established in law. there is a heavy burden to be discharged in case of one who alleges malafide, as ruled by the apex court in indian railway construction co. ltd. v. ajay kumar . mere allegations of malafide on general basis is not apt and sufficient in law to establish it, as ruled by ..... additional charge of the post until further orders, services of ms. rashmi jain, director in the office of the principal director of commercial audit & ex-officio member audit board-ii, new delhi, will be placed at the disposal of the government of india, ministry of health & family welfare, for appointment as senior financial adviser in all ..... being a condition precedent need not be expressed. it is not to be communicated to the concerned. however, unsuitability on unsatisfactory performance has to be inferred by the acts of the concerned and the impact, which has been caused as an implication over the interest of the institution. if the competent authority, i.e., ministry on .....

Mahendra Singh Vs. Union of India Through General Manager, Allahabad a ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... coming to their conclusion about the guilt of misconduct of the applicant. (3)the vigilance team did not follow the guidelines prescribed in paragraphs 704 and 705 of indian railway vigilance manual (irvm) while conducting the decoy operation: no independent witness was used, let alone of gazetted rank. prosecution witness no.1 admits in his deposition ..... of her contentions. (4)learned counsel further contends that the io did not act impartially while holding the enquiry. his conduct was more in the nature of a prosecutor. he did not examine the applicant strictly in accordance with rule-9(21) of indian railway (discipline and conduct) rules, 1968 which mandates that the io was to place ..... irvm have been prescribed to ensure transparency about a vigilance trap or decoy operation. the objective is to ensure that the action of the vigilance team is above board and not inspired by any other motive. she places reliance on (i) the judgment of the honble supreme court in the case moni shankar vs. .....

Ravi Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Union of India Through the General Manager, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... apprenticeship in the said trade. this letter has not been challenged by the applicant. so long the qualifications for the post were prescribed by the railway board and applicant did not fulfill them, no case is made out for interference by the tribunal specially when these rules have not been challenged by the ..... inter apprentice from serving employees is prevalent. it is clarified that the qualification of iti/ act apprenticeship should be in the trades relevant to the post of je ii for absorption in which the selection is conducted. 2. indian railway establishment manual (irem) vol.i, 1989 should also be amended as in the advance ..... against 25% ldce quota (apprentice mechanic quota) wherein all the terms and conditions including educational qualifications were clearly mentioned. applicant was not eligible as per railway board s instructions dated 25.8.2003, hence he was not called for the examination. they have specifically stated that applicant does not possess the qualification of .....

Ravinder Kumar, Ips (Retired) Vs. Union of India Through Home Secretar ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... no.99/vgl/66 dated 28.09.2000; and considering the judgment of this tribunal in the matter of gurdial singh v. secretary, railway board and others (oa no.446/2006 decided on 13.02.2007) and also the judgment of honble apex court in the matter ..... :- article no.i - when the applicant was posted as deputy inspector general of police (dig of police)/assistant inspector general of police, railway and traffic, northern range, dharamshala during the period 11.04.1994 to 25.10.1994, he directed his subordinate officers to arrange a refrigerator ..... rules, 1969. feeling aggrieved by the penalty order and the charge memo, he has instituted this oa under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 with the following prayers:- a) quash and set aside the impugned memorandum dated 28.03.1995 (annexure a-1) as illegal and ..... dr. ramesh chandra panda, member (a): 1. shri ravinder kumar an indian police service (ips) officer of himachal pradesh cadre belonging to 1977 batch has been aggrieved by the .....

Dr. P.K. Seth Vs. the Secretary and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)(2)SLJ304CAT

..... court in mahabir santosh kumar v. state of u.p. and ors. as well as on the basis of dopt o.m. dated 5.11.1985.director (marketing) indian oil corporation ltd. and anr. v. santosh kumar ruled that non-application of mind by disciplinary authority is an illegality.the superintendent of post offices and ors. v. ..... programme. the stand of prasar bharati (broadcasting corporation of india) is that the 'khas khabr' is news bulletin and in term of a resolution adopted by the board of prasar bharati (broadcasting corporation of india) on the 13th march, 1999 such newa bulletins are not permissible for production by outside producers for airing of the same ..... producer in obtaining leave to withdraw the writ petition. these decisions were obviously contrary to the decisions of the prasar bharati board and the stand of doordarshan on the writ petition pending before the kolkata high court. by his above act, dr. p.k. seth has failed to maintain absolute integrity, exhibited lack of devotion to duty and .....

Suman Bala Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... in class-ill posts as clerks. in the case of sheikh abdul alim (supra) and ram kumar (supra) also, in terms of the instructions of the railway board dated 14.8.1996, directions were made that cases of applicants for regularisation should be considered after holding screening tests.7. here is a case where in the ..... respondents under the provisions of the contempt of courts act, 1971.8. relying on the ratios in the matters of badri prasad (supra). sheikh abdul alim. (supra) and ram kumar (supra), in the facts and circumstances of the present case, we find that the instructions of the railway board dated 14.8.1996 are certainly applicable to ..... the rules and law.5. on the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents stated that casual labourer, in terms of paragraph 2007(3) of the indian railway establishment manual volume-ii, engaged in work charged establishment, on getting promoted to semi-skilled, skilled and highly skilled categories due to non-availability of regular departmental .....